BULLHORN #25
Truman Strike Group Returns Today
After Seven Months At Sea
(NORFOLK VIRGINIAN-PILOT 04 JUN
08) ... Matthew Jones
When the Truman carrier strike
group arrives home this morning, its nearly 7,500
sailors will begin a much deserved rest.
The group spent the past seven
months supporting ground troops in Iraq, watching
pirates off the Horn of Africa, guarding oil platforms
in the Persian Gulf and training with multiple navies
from the west coast of Africa to the Black Sea.
It also made progress in the slow,
patient process of building trust and cooperation in the
region.
The Harry S. Truman strike group
approached and assisted more than 1,000 local ships in
the waters of the Gulf and Mediterranean. These visits
were a way to say hello, build goodwill and urge locals
to contact the Navy with any reports of piracy,
smuggling and the like.
“We look at it as the
cop-on-the-beat role,” said Cmdr. Fred Pyle, commanding
officer of the destroyer Winston S. Churchill. “We’re
showing our presence and not allowing that sort of
behavior.”
While the cruise’s only seizure was
of a Pakistani vessel carrying 10,000 bottles of
whiskey, “we’re putting the word out that we’re there,”
said Capt. Herman Shelanski, the Truman ’s commanding
officer.
“We got some calls that there were
pirates, but we’re not embedded closely yet to know who
they are to track them and take them down.”
The crew of the destroyer Oscar
Austin used a new set of eyes in the sky to rein in
pirates off the Horn of Africa.
Somali pirates had seized the
Panamanian merchant ship Golden Nori in late October.
The destroyer moved in, preventing the pirates from
resupplying the ship. It kept watch via continuous
launches of a ScanEagle unmanned aerial vehicle – the
Oscar Austin is the first combatant ship to deploy with
one.
“It’s the best tool I have had
since the invention of e-mail,” said Cmdr. James Midkiff,
the ship’s commanding officer. The plane provided images
from 50 nautical miles away, helping the crew keep watch
over the bad guys: what they were doing, even what color
shirts they were wearing, he said.
During the cruise, planes aboard
the Truman delivered 77,536 pounds of ordnance,
including 148 bombs and 986 rounds of 20 mm ammunition.
While this remains a key mission, the role of the planes
themselves is changing to include more safeguarding of
and reconnaissance for ground troops, said Capt. Andrew
Lewis, deputy commander of Carrier Air Wing 3.
“The better success now is when we
don’t drop bombs,” he said. “It shows things are more
under control.”
In January, two of the air wing’s
F/A-18 Super Hornets collided in midair over the Persian
Gulf. The three aviators were rescued, but both planes
were destroyed. The incident remains under
investigation.
“It was a scary night,” Lewis said,
“but the bottom line was we got our people back.”
International operations were big
part of the strike group’s mission, from the exercises
conducted with Greece, France, Great Britain, Oman and
the United Arab Emirates, among others, to work with the
Truman’s deployment partners, the British destroyer
Manchester and the Canadian frigate Charlottetown.
The carrier trained with a trio of
French Rafale jets, two of which landed on board. The
exercises came as France’s lone carrier, the Charles de
Gaulle, was in the yard. This was the first time French
jets landed aboard the Truman.
In the Gulf, the strike group also
helped the Bahrainis take command of the maritime forces
of the Gulf Cooperation Council, the first time a member
nation has assumed what was traditionally a Western
role.
The cruiser San Jacinto spent its
deployment in the Atlantic, Mediterranean and Black Sea.
It worked on search-and-rescue training with the
Senegalese and helicopter operations with Ukrainian and
Romanian forces.
“The spirit was one of mutual
benefit,” said Capt. Matthew Sharpe, the ship’s
commanding officer. “It feels good to be in that
environment. We’re defined by a bond among mariners that
transcends national boundaries.”
Rear Admiral Mark Fox, the strike
group’s commander, agreed, saying these were good
lessons for the United States as well.
“It’s clear to me that no one
nation can do this by themselves,” he said.
USS NIMITZ and group home
(KGTV (SAN DIEGO ABC) 03 JUN 08)We saw a sea of hugs
after months at sea for thousands of San Diego
Sailors and Marines. Two strike groups are home
today. Among the ships coming back are the aircraft
carrier USS Nimitz and two of its support ships, the
Princeton and the Higgins. Also returning, the
amphibious assault ship USS Tarawa, the Cleveland,
the Germantown and Marines from the 11th Marine
Expeditionary Unit. Jennifer Jensen reports
A product of...
Navy Office of
Information
www.chinfo.navy.mil www.navy.mil 703.697.5342
June 3, 2008
CNO
Monthly Update 3JUN08
“We must remain a global Navy that is forward and that
has the credible combat power to be a deterrent force
and also a force that gives the Commander in Chief
options. That's at the heart of all that we do and what
we are about.”
-- Adm. Gary Roughead, Chief of Naval Operations
May was a busy month for CNO as he traveled to several
different parts of the country and three European
nations. During a nine-day trip throughout Europe, CNO
participated in the Chiefs of European Navy conference
in Bulgaria, completed a counterpart visit with the
First Sea Lord in the UK and spoke at a maritime
planning conference in Denmark. All were opportunities
to build and strengthen partnerships and continue
discussions with international maritime leaders about
the importance of cooperation and collaboration amongst
partner nations.
During his travels in the United States, the CNO took
part in the 2008 Association of Naval Services Officer (ANSO)
Symposium where he discussed Navy diversity initiatives
with Hispanic officers. He also attended the 2008 Port
Everglades Fleet Week Celebration, where he spoke with
Sailors and local citizens about his top three
priorities for the Navy.
Warfighting readiness – Today’s Navy and Marine Corps
team is an extremely capable force.
Right now, 54 percent of the Navy’s ships are underway,
and 42 percent of the force is deployed. There are
14,700 Sailors with “boots on the ground in the Middle
East” and more than 72,000 who are deployed overall
around the world. Many Sailors are serving as Individual
Augmentees, providing critical skills in
mission-essential areas such as electronic warfare,
intelligence, logistics and detainee support operations.
“It really gives me a great sense of pride to see our
young men and women who can go off into a very different
environment and perform missions and functions that are
really making a difference.”
Future force – As we maintain today’s readiness we must
also address future requirements.
The Navy continues to take an active role in determining
what requirements we will need to maintain warfighter
readiness in the future by seeking to build a force that
delivers better combat capability than is available
today. That’s why CNO believes it is critical that the
Navy ensures that the focus on future development
remains intact and that the goal of a minimum 313-ship
Fleet is reached. One ship that is of particular
importance is the Littoral Combat Ship which is vital as
it allows the Navy to move into the areas of the world
that would otherwise be inaccessible. LCS fills a
warfighting gap and will have a central role in
achieving core capabilities outlined in the Maritime
Strategy.
“We're going to be a forward deployed Navy, we're going
to be out and about and we need numbers because capacity
becomes a capability at some point. As the leader of our
global Navy, I am committed to achieving a floor of 313
ships.”
People – Reflecting the face of our Nation.
Looking to the future also requires evaluation of the
people who the Navy will need to recruit and retain to
remain an agile fighting force. CNO believes it is
important for the Navy to begin a dialogue with
institutions that not only share our high standards, but
also the goal of seeking to reflect the face of the
nation. To learn more about successful approaches that
might also benefit the Navy, CNO has met with leaders in
industry, academia and media who have a vested interest
in attracting and drawing young men and women of
underrepresented minorities, particularly those who are
in science and technology fields.
“I really believe that we must do all we can to foster
and encourage, attract and retain young men and women
who are diverse, but who also are comfortable in the
areas of science and technology because that will
determine our future force.”
A
product of...
Navy Office of Information
www.chinfo.navy.mil
www.navy.mil 703.697.5342
June 4, 2008
The
Navy Today … Executing the Maritime Strategy
“As part of Partnership of the Americas 2008 (POA),
GWCSG has trained with – and met with – the navies of
Brazil, Argentina, and Chile. With each opportunity,
both military to military and handshake to handshake, we
have strengthened our partnership and interoperability
with our South American neighbors.”
--
Rear Adm. Phil Cullom, Commander, George Washington
Carrier Strike Group
Around the world, the Navy is executing the six core
capabilities of the Maritime Strategy – forward
presence, deterrence, sea control, power projection,
maritime security and humanitarian assistance/disaster
response.
Power projection to
win our nation’s wars
• USS Harry S.
Truman Carrier Strike Group (HST CSG) returns from
deployment today after supporting Maritime Security
Operations in the 5th
and 6th
Fleet Areas of Operation. Throughout the
deployment, Carrier Air Wing Three (CVW-3) aircraft flew
more than 9,500 sorties – 2,459 of which were combat
sorties directly supporting Coalition forces operating
on the ground in Iraq – and expended 77,500 pounds of
ordnance during 228 troops-in-contact events.
• USS Ronald Reagan
(CVN 76) recently completed an undersea warfare exercise
(USWEX) in the waters of the Hawaiian operating area.
This exercise was the final test for the Ronald Reagan
Carrier Strike Group, which deployed May 19, before it
headed to the Western Pacific and 7th Fleet area of
responsibility. Also participating in the exercise were
a cruiser, three destroyers, a frigate, and two
fast-attack submarines, testing the strike group’s
capabilities and certifying them to go to war.
Maritime Security
• The USS Abraham
Lincoln Carrier Strike Group is operating in the Fifth
Fleet AOR to maintain maritime security, ensure regional
access for commerce, and confront and defend against
violent extremists. Strike Group aircraft are providing
defense to Iraqi oil platforms while conducting Maritime
Security Operations and flying combat sorties in Iraq in
support of Coalition forces on the ground.
Building maritime
partnerships for regional stability
• CVW-3 aircraft,
flying from the deck of Truman, conducted a variety of
theater security cooperation exercises with five
countries in the Sixth and Fifth Fleet theaters to
enhance interoperability and tactical proficiency. These
exercises fostered stronger ties with regional navies,
strengthened relationships with allied nations and
improved collaboration among Coalition Task Forces.
Promoting
interoperability for trust and confidence
• USS George
Washington Carrier Strike Group recently participated in
a multinational task group with Chilean air and surface
units as part of Partnership for America (POA). GW CSG
conducted anti-submarine exercise while also providing
close-air support and being directed by both
ground-based special operations controllers and airborne
forward air controllers. This is the third consecutive
year U.S. surface units have participated in POA.
Status of the Navy (as of 3 Jun)
|
Navy Personnel
Total Active Component: 331,608
Total Reserve Component: 125,734
DoN Civilians: 180,122
Ships, Submarines & Aircraft
Total deployable ships/subs: 279
Ships/subs underway: 128 (46%)
Ships forward deployed: 119 (43%)
Total Operational Aircraft: 3,700+ |
Ground Forces in NAVCENT AOR
Countries ≥400 AC RC
Iraq 5,324 1,136
Bahrain 2,779 80
Kuwait 1,086 805
Afghanistan 1,455 297
Qatar 671 11
Djibouti 637 42
Total all countries on ground 14,810
|
Sailors at Sea by AOR
NAVCENT/C5F 9,660
PACFLT 27,746
NAVSOUTH/C4F 3,250
C2F 13,600
CNE-C6F 2,363
For more information on the current status of
the Navy, visit: www.navy.mil.
|
Date: 05-Jun-08
News Release Number: EHD200806051
News Release Copy: NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND, PATUXENT
RIVER, Md. – NAVAIR’s Military Flight Operations Quality
Assurance (MFOQA) program will accelerate deployment to
the rate of one new platform per fiscal year.
The MFOQA program, managed by the Air Combat
Electronics Program Office (PMA209), has excellent
support from Navy leadership. Mr. Thomas Matthews, the
MFOQA Integrated Program Team leader, briefed the MFOQA
program to the Secretary of the Navy, the Honorable
Donald C. Winter, in early February along with members
of the Naval Safety Center and Commander, Naval Air
Forces.
“Secretary Winter was very enthusiastic about the
MFOQA program,” said Matthews. “He tasked PMA209 to ‘do
it right and do it as quickly as possible.’ With
SECNAV’s backing, we were able to secure the budget
required to accelerate the program.”
The MFOQA program involves the analysis and trending
of aircraft flight performance and system data to
proactively enhance combat readiness through
improvements in operations, maintenance, safety and
training functions.
The program provides tools for squadron commanders to
establish a baseline for normal operations; to identify,
mitigate, and monitor operational risks while detecting
precursors to aviation mishaps; and identify operational
inefficiencies.
It also provides capabilities to all levels of the
Naval Aviation Enterprise to improve and enhance
mission-effectiveness through the awareness of abnormal
trends, continuous knowledge of aircraft systems
performance, and insight into the effectiveness of
procedures, policies, and aircrew training on actual
mission accomplishment.
The first Navy platforms to fully incorporate the
MFOQA program are the F/A-18C-F and the EA-18G
communities. “The Hornet has the most mature data
collection system,” added Matthews. “Our other platforms
are very close to having the same capability. We plan to
field MFOQA on all Navy and Marine Corps aircraft, as
directed and prioritized by Navy leadership and
Commander, Naval Air Forces, at the rate of one platform
community per year.”
“MFOQA does not add a new black box on the aircraft,
there are no software changes required,” stated W. B.
"Chip" Brown, MFOQA Lead Engineer. “The only real
requirement is that the platform has a flight recording
system such as a mission recorder or a flight data
recorder that records applicable data and many platforms
already do.”
“MFOQA uses the data that is already routinely being
collected on the aircraft, either for mission planning
or aircraft maintenance; and a small software patch on
the platform's maintenance station, routes that
information to the MFOQA site server,” added Brown.
“The MFOQA system is approximately 70 percent
commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) software with the
remaining 30 percent Navy "glue" code which integrates
the various modules into a single, seamless
application,” said Brown. “And due to our competitive
acquisition strategy, the Government can use the
computer source code to meet platform requirements
without having to pay any recurring charges, which will
save a lot of money over the life of the program.”
The Department of the Navy (DON) MFOQA program is
based in part on the highly successful Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) Flight Operations Quality Assurance
program.
While both programs analyze digital flight data
routinely downloaded post-flight to measure the safe and
efficient operation of the aircraft, the Navy MFOQA
program enables aircrew replay of the data for
post-mission debriefings, enhanced instrument panel and
bit code displays for local maintenance troubleshooting,
and access to data at multiple levels within the Naval
Aviation Enterprise for sophisticated Fleet trending and
analysis.
“The potential benefits include significant
improvements in Maintenance, Operations, Safety, and
Training (MOST),” said Matthews. “MFOQA will provide a
proactive means to highlight positive trends and to
identify potential risks in time for corrective action.”
Fire Damage On Carrier USS George Washington
Assessed
(SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE 06 JUN 08) ...
Steve Liewer
CORONADO – A stubborn fire May 22 aboard the aircraft
carrier George Washington damaged 80 miles of electrical
cable, according to a preliminary assessment released
Friday by the Navy.
The
blaze also caused minor injuries to 24 sailors.
It's not yet clear how much the repairs will cost, how
long they will take or how they might affect plans to
move the ship to its new home port in Japan. The carrier
is currently docked at North Island Naval Air Station in
Coronado.
“We
have to go through space by space and figure out what's
been damaged and how long it's going to take to
replace,” said Capt. Scott Gureck, a spokesman for the
Hawaii-based Pacific Fleet command. “We're trying not to
rush.”
The
George Washington left Norfolk, Va., on April 7, bound
for Yokosuka, Japan. It was scheduled to reach Pearl
Harbor, Hawaii, this week to exchange equipment and
personnel with the Kitty Hawk, the retiring aircraft
carrier that the George Washington is replacing in
Japan.
The
fire broke out as the carrier traveled near the southern
tip of South America. Sailors spent 12 hours battling
flames and smoke before the flames were extinguished.
The
carrier reached Coronado on May 27. Since then, teams of
inspectors have been combing through the ship to
determine the extent of the damage. Adm. Robert Willard,
the Pacific Fleet commander, toured the area Friday.
Navy officials said the fire started in a ventilation
intake/exhaust trunk that leads from the lower decks of
the ship to a ventilation port on the ship's outer hull
above. The trunk ventilates machinery that is below the
waterline as well as carrying pipes and cables.
While damage to pipes was slight, inspectors determined,
electrical cables will require repair and, in some
cases, replacement.
A
variety of rooms suffered damage, Gureck said, including
storage spaces, cable pathways, a classroom and a
photography lab. He said the fire didn't affect the
George Washington's propulsion system or nuclear
reactor.
Gureck said the assessment will continue next week. It's
unclear whether the carrier will be able to participate
in the multinational Rim of the Pacific 2008 exercise,
scheduled to start June 29 near Hawaii.
It's also not clear
when the ship will be able to relieve the Kitty
Hawk, which is scheduled for decommissioning next
year.
Flight
International
US Navy accepts first operational EA-18G jammer
By
Stephen Trimble
Boeing delivered the first operational EA-18G Growler
electronic warfare aircraft to the US Navy on 3 June,
completing a five-year, $1 billion development phase and
starting a year-long series of final check-out tests.
The aircraft will next join three development examples (one
pictured below)
for a six-month operational evaluation starting in
September. A final series of flight trials at the USN's
China Lake test range in California will pave the way
for standing up the first operational EA-18G unit in
late fiscal year 2009.
© Craig Hoyle/Flight International
"Seven years after the navy selected the EA-18G to
replace the [Northrop Grumman] EA-6B Prowler, the
Growler has arrived - on cost and ahead of schedule,"
secretary of the navy Donald Winter said during the
delivery ceremony at NAS Whidbey Island, Washington.
The EA-18G leverages the airframe of the Boeing F/A-18F
Super Hornet and Northrop's improved capability-III (ICAP-III)
electronic warfare suite now flying on a subset of the
EA-6B fleet.
Boeing executives, however, insist that several EA-18G
features transform the aircraft into a next-generation
jamming platform, including its use of the Super
Hornet's Raytheon APG-79 active electronically scanned
array radar. The ICAP-III suite also incorporates an
all-new communications countermeasures set and an
interference cancellation system, which allows EA-18G
crews to continue communicating with other friendly
aircraft even while jamming enemy radar.
But the most important leap is a new software package
called the EA-18G data correlation mechanism, says
Boeing programme manager Mike Gibbons. This
automatically correlates streams of data generated by
all of the Growler's on-board sensors, including the
APG-79, ICAP-III receivers and even the Raytheon AGM-88E
high-speed anti-radiation missile.
Better performance is also coming from unexpected
sources, says Capt Mark Darrah, the navy's F/A-18 and
EA-18 programme manager. Splitting the tail-mounted
"American football"-shaped ALQ-218 receiver into two
separate wingtip pods for the EA-18G was considered a
design risk, but has improved the overall system's
performance.
Although the wingtip presents a more aerodynamically
harsh environment for the receiver, special materials
developed for the radome have overcome hazards such as
hail-strike, and the new location offers better signals
reception, regardless of the radome issues. "We're
actually seeing signals that we never saw before [with
the EA-6B]," Darrah says.
The USN plans to buy a total of 85 EA-18Gs through the
next decade, although only the first 52 are under
contract for production over the next four years.
Another three are sought by the navy in the pending
supplemental budget request for FY2008.
More orders could be added depending on how the US
Air Force decides to acquire an expeditionary
electronic warfare fleet. USAF officials have
repeatedly rejected the carrier-based EA-18G, but
Boeing insists that the Growler remains in play. The
US Marine Corps is also studying replacement options
for its EA-6Bs, but is expected to focus on
converting the Lockheed Martin F-35B Joint Strike
Fighter into a jamming platform.
Welcome to U.S. Air Force AIM Points
UPDATED: June 9, 2008
Full Version
Navy, Air Force see different futures for unmanned
drones
BY: , Associated Press
06/06/2008
The Navy lags well behind the Air Force in the
development of armed drones -- the unmanned aircraft now
used increasingly in Iraq and Afghanistan -- insisting
that its "Top Gun" fighter pilots are still smarter,
better and more flexible in combat.
But the contrasting visions for the next generation of
America's air arsenal point to wider debates within the
military about the pace of incorporating remote-control
technology into future battle strategies.
It
also touches on differences in military cultures -- with
the Navy coming under criticism for its apparent
resistance to substitute fighter pilot training and
instincts with aircraft guided by operators who can be
thousands of miles away.
For the moment, the Navy is deeply committed to plans
for the F-35 fighter jet and developing a drone fleet
strictly for surveillance and other non-weapon tasks.
The Air Force, meanwhile, has used armed drones for
years and appears to embody Pentagon trends to encourage
drones as a way to reduce costs and consolidate
personnel.
Defense Secretary Robert Gates, in a speech in April,
called on the Air Force and other military officials to
rethink "long-standing service assumptions and
priorities about which missions require certified
pilots, and which do not."
Gates added that "unmanned systems cost much less and
offer greater loiter times than their manned
counterparts -- making them ideal for many of today's
tasks."
But many Navy pilots believe the drone technology has
its limits when called on to strike targets, saying that
pilots cannot be fully replaced.
"I'm not worried about losing my job, let me put it that
way," said Lt. Cmdr. Brice Casey, an F/A-18 fighter jet
pilot.
The Navy currently uses Global Hawk reconnaissance
drones and is developing a helicopter-like unmanned
aircraft called the Fire Scout that can take off and
land vertically on ships. But neither operate off
aircraft carriers or possess strike capability.
Last year, the Navy awarded its first-ever contract for
a drone that will be able to operate from a carrier. It
isn't scheduled for deployment until 2025 and is also
limited to reconnaissance missions.
That puts the Navy many years behind the Air Force,
which first used an armed version of the Predator drone
in combat in Afghanistan in 2001. The Air Force's latest
version, the Reaper, can carry up to 14 Hellfire
air-to-ground missiles or alternately, four Hellfires
and two 500-pound bombs over Iraq, Afghanistan or other
war zones.
Tom Ehrhard, an
expert on unmanned aircraft at the Center for
Strategic and Budgetary Assessments in Washington,
predicted it would take pressure from Congress and
the defense secretary to "continue to move the Navy
down this path" toward an eventual armed drone. The
Air Force has taken some of its pilots out of the
air to staff drones to try to keep up with increased
demand from soldiers on the battlefield. But the
Navy says drones are no substitute for trained
pilots in the cockpit.
From:
Air Force Magazine Online
Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:17 AM
Young Details JSF
Costs:
Pentagon acquisition boss John Young said June 6 it
takes thoughtful analysis to understand the reasons for
the cost growth in the F-35 program over the past five
years. "You cannot simply look at this [program] and
determine it's out of control," Young told reporters in
the Pentagon. "Is the increase bad? Yes, but it's not a
crisis." Three days prior, Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.),
chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said
during a committee hearing with Young that the F-35
program's projected total costs have increased by $37
billion over the last five years. Young on June 6 broke
down the increases, pointing out that $13 billion
followed increased cost of materials due to global
demand. The Navy's decision to cut the quantity of the
Navy/Marine Corps buy by 409 airframes down to 680
caused per-unit costs to spike. And labor increases were
also a factor. A further example that led to cost
increases is the challenge of estimating materials, such
as the size of a block of steel needed to carve down
into a bulkhead, he said. "We were not as efficient
there." Those challenges alone drove some higher
materials costs to the tune of about $11 billion over
five years, he said. Incidentally, DOD's
most recent cost
estimates
for the F-35 showed that the program actually dropped in
cost by about $1 billion, to $298.84 billion, down from
$299.82 billion. This estimate covers the final quarter
of 2007. This led Young
to tell lawmakers
in March that the F-35 program is "well managed and well
run."
Good Call:
With the
first flight of the F-35B short takeoff/vertical
landing test aircraft
steadily
approaching,
the decision, in retrospect, to fly the F-35A
conventional flying variant first was a good one,
even though it was criticized at the time, said John
Young, the Pentagon's top weapons buyer. Speaking to
reporters June 6 in the Pentagon, Young said much
was learned about the program by putting the F-35A
variant into testing first to work out any engine
issues before moving to the STOVL aircraft, which
presents more challenging propulsion modes. "We've
now had 44 flights without engine issues," Young
said of the first F-35A test aircraft, which is
dubbed AA-1. "I expect the same results from STOVL
number one." This aircraft is designated
BF-1.
Young said that there are some design changes being
made to the STOVL variant to resolve some of its
engine difficulties,
but he feels good about the fixes and does not want
to stop the program due to the enormous cost it
would engender.
Fighter Pilots Get Reacquainted With USS Stennis
(KITSAP SUN 08 JUN 08)
A beefed-up USS John C. Stennis has
rejoined its aircraft wing off the Southern California
coast in preparation for a 2009 deployment.
The Bremerton-based aircraft
carrier hadn't combined with Air Wing 9 since dropping
off the planes and helicopters in San Diego last August
on its way home from the Middle East. The strike force
had spent 7 ½ months providing ground support in the war
on terror, mostly in Afghanistan.
Since then, the Stennis received
$240 million in upgrades and repairs during a six-month
stay at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard. It passed sea trials
in late March and departed for California. Last week,
pilots met up with the ship and began qualifying to fly
missions from the carrier. Plane pilots who haven't been
to a carrier in six months must make two-day landings,
two day touch-and-goes and four night landings, and then
land once a week to maintain their night proficiency.
Like the ship, the air wing has
gone through several changes and upgrades, and pilots
are using the exercises to practice some of their new
capabilities, such as aerial refueling. They'll also
practice using live ordnance, which they don't have the
opportunity to do very often. The ship is also adjusting
to being the first aircraft carrier to operate with two
helicopter squadrons onboard after adding the "Raptors"
of Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron 71. The Stennis
will be the first carrier to deploy with the new MH-60R
helicopters. The squadron, the first of five planned,
was established in October. The helicopters' missions
include anti-submarine warfare, anti-surface warfare,
surveillance communications relay, search and rescue,
naval gunfire support, logistics support and personnel
transfer.
"It's going to revolutionize
anti-submarine warfare operations by combining the best
capabilities of the SH-60B and SH-60F platforms," said
Capt. Daniel H. Fillion, the squadron's commanding
officer.
The MH-60R will be one of only two
helicopter airframes used on aircraft carriers once the
Navy reduces from its current seven types. It is
designed to also operate from frigates, destroyers and
cruisers.
While the Stennis crew is working on integrating
with its air wing, it is also honing other
responsibilities. One of those addressed recently
was responding to a mass casualty. A graded drill
showed how well the medical staff provided
treatment, security people contained the situation,
and the rest of the ship carried stretchers or
stayed out of the way. Casualties were sorted into
four categories as they were removed from the scene.
The goal was to get those most in need of surgery
down to the operating room within 20 minutes.
Boeing, Navy Readying For First P-8 Flight In FY '09
(DEFENSE DAILY 10 JUN 08) ...
Geoff Fein The
next year will be a busy time for the Navy's P-8
Poseidon program as it prepares for first flight of its
developmental test aircraft in FY '09 and begins static
and fatigue testing about the same time, a Navy official
said.
The first aircraft is in final
assembly waiting for engine mating.
In the March-April '09 time frame,
that aircraft will get the rest of its avionics
installed before Boeing [BA] turns the aircraft over to
the Navy, Capt. Joe Rixey, P-8 and P-3C program manager
told Defense Daily in a recent interview.
Rixey said there have been some
questions about supplier parts, but there haven't been
any issues.
"We've got S-1, it's on the Wichita
line, and all the parts are showing up on the dock on
time. That build is going real well," he said.
S-1 is the first of two static and
fatigue test articles. It is being built at Wichita,
Kan.-based Spirit AeroSystems.
"So there is learning curve in
terms of assemble, there is a learning curve in terms of
supplier management...we got through that.
We are still on our schedule,"
Rixey said.
That schedule plans for initial
operational capability (IOC) in FY '13, followed by full
operational capability around the FY '19, FY '20 time
frame, he added.
In addition to the test aircraft
under construction, the Navy and Boeing have built two
reaction frames at the company's Wichita facility to
conduct the static and fatigue testing.
Static and fatigue testing will
commence in the FY '09 time frame for S-1 and around the
second quarter of FY '10 for S-2, Rixey added.
T-1 will be the first aircraft to
take to the air toward the end of FY '09. T-2 and T-3
will go into testing as they are delivered and will
undergo developmental testing for two and a half years
following T-1's first flight, Rixey said.
There has been some discussion
examining whether the P-8 program could be accelerated
because of the issues with the P-3C Orion's wings, Rixey
noted.
"We've run various drills on
accelerating the P-8, but all of that has to be vetted
through our Milestone Decision Authorities and our
leadership before we can move," he said. "But at this
point we are still executing the program of record. But
we are looking at all the contingencies associated with
the P-3 red stripe."
In December '07, the Navy grounded
39 Lockheed Martin [LMT] P-3C aircraft due to structural
fatigue concerns (Defense Daily, Dec. 18).
Rixey said the Navy has learned
some lessons from the P-3C that the service and Boeing
are using in development of the P-8.
One example he cites deals with
static and fatigue testing.
The last time the Navy put a P-3 on
a reaction frame, for static and fatigue issues, was
five years ago, he said.
The Navy and Boeing are building
the P-8 up front, collecting information from the two
static and fatigue test articles (S-1 and S- 2).
"We are going to have that
data...maintenance plans, understand crack growth,
understand our maintenance procedures, understand our
limitations and develop our maintenance schedules
associated with that instead of reacting to it like we
had to do with the P-3," Rixey said.
"We are going to run that aircraft
to two life cycles, and we are going to take it and
validate its ultimate load. That's what we are doing up
front, and that was a major lesson learned," he added.
The P-8 is a military derivative of
Boeing's 737-800.
Building off a commercial
derivative will result in significant savings in
tooling, Rixey said, as well as in schedule.
This is the first time the Navy is
not taking a "green truck,"
buying it from Boeing, taking and
tearing it apart and then rebuilding it, Rixey said.
"There is significant labor in just doing that."
"So there were significant savings
in terms of cost and schedule...by doing this in-line
build for all these aircraft and not going to a chop
shop," he added. "The other area of savings is
supportability. We are going to be able to leverage the
vast FAA parts pool and support infrastructure for those
common parts.
Obviously for the mission specific
stuff we will have to have our traditional support
methodologies."
But that does cut down quite a bit
on sparing and warehousing, Rixey added.
But even though the 737-800 is
currently in use, the Navy will still have to certify
the aircraft's worthiness, he added.
"Its got to be certified by Navy
because our fatigue spectrum and our flight profile
deviate from an FAA aircraft," Rixey said. "We will
leverage off those flight regimes that are similar, but
for the most part we are going to have to go check those
that deviate."
The P-8 was built to be an open air
vehicle, Rixey said.
The Navy built its next-generation
Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) platform with growth in
mind. One area, Rixey said the Navy is proud that
contained within the contractual language is the
requirement for an open systems architecture for
avionics. "But it is open beyond that."
"We have a lot of cabin volume. We
have a lot of growth in terms of weight. We can actually
go about 21,000-pounds more in terms of mission
systems," he explained. "But what you end up doing
there, if you add on more payload you take off fuel. We
are still required to go 1,200 nautical miles in four
hours to do our ASW mission."
Along with the potential for growth
in cabin volume, there is also room for growth in power,
Rixey said.
"We are not even near 50 percent on
power usage. We have two 180 kVA generators and an APU
(auxiliary power unit)...that's significant power. We
have good cooling and we are able to leverage that power
by the way off the wedge tail design," he added.
The Navy also added four inches to
the bomb bay so that the P-8 could carry joint weapons
and whatever the future brings. "We have openness in our
bomb bay. We just didn't design it for the MK 54."
In addition to that, the P-8 has a
digital stores management system, something lacking on
the P-3, Rixey noted. "This allows you to spiral in
different weapons that can been envisioned in the future
as well."
"When you combine all those things we are bringing
an aircraft that's built on a commercial line,
leveraging commercial practices, using commercial
parts pool sparing, bringing an availability that we
haven't seen in a long long time," Rixey said. "And
its got a potential for growth, because as you know,
we've got spirals coming through our evolutionary
design. You can see its critical we get the airplane
out there because our P-3 problem is not the mission
suite. We've kept pace with the threat with that.
Our P-3 problem is the air vehicle."
Ready, AIM-9, Fire!
Story Number: NNS080610-09
Release Date: 6/10/2008 2:00:00 PM
By Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class (SW) Elliott
J. Fabrizio, USS John C. Stennis Public Affairs
USS JOHN C. STENNIS, At Sea (NNS) -- Carrier Air
Wing (CVW) 9, embarked aboard USS John C. Stennis (CVN
74), performed live missile shoots June 4 and 6. The
squadron fired a total of 12 missiles to give pilots
experience and confidence with launching live
ordnance.
"It's an invaluable training experience, especially
for someone like me who's newer in the squadron, to
get a feel for how that weapon is actually
employed," said Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 147
Pilot Lt. j.g. Micah Porter. "I got to see firsthand
how it comes off the rail, how long it takes to
squeeze the trigger, how that missile operates with
the radar and how that all works together."
The air wing's four F-18 squadrons, the "Argonauts"
of VFA-147, the "Black Knights" of VFA-154, the
"Blue Diamonds" of VFA-146 and the "Death Rattlers"
of Marine Strike Fighter Squadron (VMFA) 323 each
participated in missile shoot exercises.
The missiles used in the missile shoot exercise were
the air-to-air "Sparrow" Air Intercept Missile
(AIM-7) and the "Sidewinder" (AIM-9). The
"Sidewinder" uses infrared seekers to track heat
sources put out by enemy engines, while the
"Sparrow" is a radar-guided missile.
The pilots use flares, deployed during the mission,
as targets during their live-fire exercises.
"We train like we fight, so you never treat a
practice round like a practice round, but when you
know it's real, it gives you added confidence in
your ability to actually fire the missile when you
need it," said Blue Diamonds Pilot Lt. Dan Chiafair.
To maintain battle proficiency, squadrons need to
complete live-fire missions throughout their
turnaround cycles, which are training cycles that
run from deployment to deployment.
"Commander Naval Air Forces has an instruction that
gives them exact guidance," said CVW-9 Ordnance
Officer Lt. James Willett. "But basically, every
turnaround cycle, they have to expend a given amount
of ordnance to maintain all of their squadron and
pilot qualifications."
Aviation Ordnancemen (AO) also improve their skills
handling and loading live missiles.
"Anytime that the AOs are actually loading real
ordnance, it gives them a sense of pride knowing
real ordnance is coming off the jet," said Porter.
"It also gives them the training opportunity to wire
it for real, so that the missile can actually be
fired."
Ensuring pilots can confidently deploy any weapon in
their arsenal is part of America's maritime strategy
to maintain constant warfighting readiness.
VP-1 Returns to Whidbey Island
Story
Number: NNS080611-06
Release Date: 6/11/2008 9:59:00 AM
By
Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Tucker M. Yates,
Fleet Public Affairs Center, Detachment Northwest
OAK HARBOR, Wash. (NNS) -- Patrol Squadron (VP) 1,
the "Screaming Eagles," returned home to Naval Air
Station (NAS) Whidbey Island after a six-month
deployment to the Eastern Pacific, June 9.
The Screaming Eagles departed November, 2007, to
support Commander 7th Fleet and Combined Task Force
72 anti-submarine warfare (ASW) and intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) missions.
"We flew in excess of 2,500 flight hours and that
was with, instead of the normal complement of 10
aircraft, four aircraft at times," said Cmdr. Mark
Rudesill, VP-1 executive officer.
"We had a quite a few accomplishments in support of
Operation Enduring Freedom and the global war on
terror[ism], specifically in the Philippines," he
said.
Rudesill was proud of the effort put forth by his
Sailors.
"We've done a remarkable job," said Rudesill. "The
whole squadron from top to bottom all performed
magnificently on station. I'm very proud of all of
them. We're happy to be home and happy to be home
safe."
VP-1 will be the last NAS Whidbey Island Patrol
Squadron to be integrated into the newly stood up
Consolidated Maintenance Organization (CMO) 10. VP-1
will transfer accountability for their aircraft and
maintainers to the organization in an effort to
produce more capable aircraft and maintenance crews
while maintaining the most efficient and
cost-effective methods.
"I was working with a few of the other squadrons
before we left so I've already integrated a little
into this. Overall, I think it will be a little bit
better as far as working hours and being set up on
deployment rotation schedules," said Aviation
Electrician's Mate 2nd Class Brandon Ruby, of VP-1,
who will be working in CMO-10. "We don't know all
the fine details until we get into it, but so far,
so good."
Lockheed Fighter For
Marines Flies For First Time
(REUTERS 11 JUN 08) ...
Andrea Shalal-Esa
The
Marine Corps variant of Lockheed Martin Corp's F-35
fighter jet completed its first conventional flight on
Wednesday, with a flight in the short takeoff/vertical
landing (STOVL) mode planned for later this year.
The first
flight of the F-35 aircraft designated BF-1 began at
10:17 a.m. CDT (1517 GMT) and lasted 44 minutes,
according to John Smith, a spokesman for Lockheed.
Lockheed
and its partners are developing three variants of the
F-35 or Joint Strike Fighter for the Air Force, Marine
Corps and Navy, and to sell to other countries. All
three variants are based on a common design.
Development is led by the United States, but includes
Britain and seven other international partners. A former
British military pilot was the first to fly the new jet.
The
Pentagon estimates the overall F-35 program, including
research and development, will cost $298.8 billion. The
cost of each plane is forecast at almost $70 million,
based on plans for the U.S. military to buy 2,443 F-35
fighter jets through 2034.
The
aircraft flown on Wednesday was powered by an engine
developed by Pratt & Whitney, a unit of United
Technologies Corp. The company had several engine blades
snap off during earlier ground tests of the STOVL mode.
The
problem never affected the engine during conventional
flight mode, and Pratt & Whitney says it is on track to
begin testing of the engine in STOVL mode later this
year.
"We are
working closely with our customers, Lockheed Martin and
the joint program office; we have identified the root
cause, and we are working toward a STOVL mode flight
later this year," said Stephanie Duvall, a Pratt &
Whitney spokeswoman.
The F-35
program is the world's largest military project,
involving 11 countries -- nine working on the
development effort and two additional security partners.
It employs about 20,000 people worldwide.
The F-35
is a single-seat, single-engine military strike fighter
that can perform close air support, tactical bombing and
air superiority fighter missions.
Northrop
Grumman Corp and Britain's BAE Systems are Lockheed's
main subcontractors on the program. A team comprising
General Electric and Britain's Rolls-Royce is developing
an alternate engine
===================
Lockheed Martin
Conducts Successful First STOVL Flight, Second Planned
Next Week
(DEFENSE DAILY 12 JUN 08) ...
Geoff Fein
Lockheed Martin [LMT] yesterday put
its F-35B short take off vertical landing Joint Strike
Fighter (JSF) into the air for the first time, marking
the beginning of months of deliveries and flight tests
of the next-generation Marine Corps fighter.
BAE Systems test pilot Graham
Tomlinson flew BF-1 for 44 minutes, reaching speeds up
to 230 knots, he told reporters yesterday.
"Any first flight on a new airplane
you are really trying to prove from the moment you take
off that the airplane is safe and suitable for landing,"
he said.
During the 44-minute flight,
Tomlinson took BF-1 to 15,000 feet with the gear down.
That altitude was chosen as a safe height to start
exercising the throttle and check out the engine, he
said. "We exercised the throttle to make sure the engine
responded as we expected it to do, and it did."
After that, Tomlinson spent the
remainder of the first flight flying at slower speeds,
checking flight qualities...the feel of the aircraft to
make sure it flies nicely, he said.
"On the way back, we did a little
bit of formation flying. The reason we did that was when
you are in close formation with another airplane, in
this case an F-18, then you get a bit more active,"
Tomlinson said.
Having a target to fly against is
good for sampling the controls and the engine response,
Tomlinson said. "Making sure it still responds nicely to
a higher gain environment, because when you get to the
final landing and the ground rushes up to meet you, then
you tend to be putting in those slightly higher gain
control inputs in the final phase of a landing."
At no time during Wednesday's
flight did Tomlinson test the STOVL system that enables
the F-35B to take off and land vertically.
"STOVL has always been planned for
later in the program,"
Tomlinson said. "We have to make
sure the airplane is mature in terms of flight controls,
engines, all subsystems, in the conventional mode and
then we will start making the equally small incremental
steps to get into the STOVL envelope and expand that
envelope."
A recent Acquisition Decision
Memorandum signed by Pentagon acquisition chief John
Young, indicated that completion of first flight was the
key milestone in terms of the award of the contract,
Brig Gen.
David Heinz, deputy executive
director JSF program, told reporters.
"This combined with a briefing to
AT&L on the STOVL engine constitutes my ability to award
the approximately $1.3 billion."
These funds will cover six
aircraft, all the spares and everything else associated
with Low Rate Initial Production II STOVL aircraft,
Heinz added.
"I anticipate [contract award] to
be as soon as possible. [My] brief to Mr. Young will be
the key driving factor now," Heinz said.
Lockheed Martin will conduct a
second flight of BF-1 on Monday, Doug Pearson, vice
president F-35 Integrated Test Force, said.
The company will conduct the first
STOVL tests in the January- March 2009 time frame, he
added. Those tests will be conducted at Lockheed
Martin's Ft. Worth, Texas, facility.
"When we've convinced ourselves the
aircraft is ready, [we'll] take it to (Naval Air
Station) Pax River (Maryland) and continue work there,"
Pearson said. "We'll end up doing the first STOVL full
landing from a hover at Pax River."
This fall Lockheed Martin intends
to do the initial "up and away"
conversion work where they will
actually open the STOVL doors in flight, Pearson said.
That work will begin prior to the first full STOVL test
flight early next year.
"This is the beginning of flight
test program for the STOVL airplane," Pearson said.
"It's a continuation of the conventional program we
started with AA-1, our first F-35 flying aircraft. That
aircraft should be starting up engines momentarily and
will be flying, unrelated to this mission...it will fly
a separate test sorties later [Wednesday] today."
Later this month AA-1 will fly out
to Edwards AFB, Calif., to begin two to four weeks of
testing, he added.
Currently in its Ft. Worth factory,
Lockheed Martin has all of the remaining 17 System
Development and Demonstration aircraft as well as the
first two LRIP jets in production, Dan Crowley,
executive vice president and F-35 program general
manager, said.
"This year we've already delivered
the first static test article for STOVL, BG-1. The next
flight aircraft to leave the factory is called BF-2. It
will leave in the July time frame and fly in January of
2009," he said. "We will complete this year the first
ground test article for the optimized CTOL (Conventional
Take Off and Landing) in the December time frame, and
we'll roll out BF-3 and BF-4 for the STOVL variant and
fly in the second quarter time frame of next year."
By the end of 2009, Lockheed Martin will have
delivered and flown all of the 18 aircraft, 12 of
which are fliers and six ground test vehicles,
Crowley noted. "So 2009 is a big year for us."
Subject: The future of automated
test equipment is called eCASS
Date: 12-Jun-08
News Release Copy: NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND, PATUXENT
RIVER, Md. – NAVAIR’s Aviation Support Equipment Program
Office is creating the future of automated test
equipment for the Navy and it is called eCASS.
What will the Electronic Consolidated Automated
Support System benches bring to the fleet? A lot of
capability in a smaller, smarter package. It starts with
a much smaller footprint with more capability, faster
run times, multi-lingual test environments; it preserves
the $2 billion investment in CASS Test Program Sets; it
facilitates factory-to-field migration of Test Programs;
it’s more interoperable with other Services’ Automated
Test Equipment; it’s more scalable to fleet needs; it
reduces acquisition and support costs; and it brings
“Smarter” test concepts with faster and better
diagnostics and reduced no-defect found rates.
Currently, CASS performs functional testing, fault
detection, fault isolation, and alignment or adjustment
of avionics components for almost every
Type/Model/Series aircraft in the Navy and Marine Corp
inventory.
“CASS has been an extremely successful program,” said
Captain Mike Belcher, Aviation Support Equipment Program
Manager (PMA 260). “CASS replaced 30 different legacy
testers with one family of ATE and eliminated all of the
logistics requirements associated with maintaining all
of those different test benches. However, because most
of the CASS components are Commercial-Off-The-Shelf
items, obsolescence is going to become a huge issue for
us to overcome. With the newer test technologies, the
time is right to modernize our ATE family of testers.”
“The plan we are working on now calls for getting the
competitive Request For Proposal on the street for an
award in early 2009,” said Belcher. “The System Design
and Development phase with Engineering Development
Models will last until approximately 2012. Then we’ll
build some Low Rate Initial Production stations and
enter Full Rate Production in 2014. Full up eCASS units
should be arriving in the fleet by 2015.”
“We’ve hit our peak in terms of CASS requirements
aboard the carriers. The typical carrier today has 19
CASS stations aboard,” said Bill Ross, Senior eCASS
Program Manager. “Our studies show that by 2020 we can
reduce that number down to 15 eCASS stations to support
the air wings of the future.”
“We are committed to keeping our current CASS Family
modern and are embarking on a program to deal with
obsolescence and technology issues,” added Ross. “CASS
first went into production in 1990, and these stations
have been well used. Our plan is to base a modernization
program on the emerging Department of Defense Automated
Test Systems Framework and we expect that industry will
insert the test technologies demonstrated in the ongoing
Reconfigurable-Transportable CASS (RTCASS) development
program and recent joint services technology
demonstration projects.”
“eCASS
will be a product of all of its predecessor testers.
The test capability inserted in the previous testers
will flow into eCASS and it is expected that as
additional new weapon system test requirements
emerge in the future, those too will flow into
eCASS,” stated Ross. “The CASS systems have avoided
almost $3.8 billion in total ownership costs for the
Navy by consolidating the functions of 30 different
test systems into a single system, and eCASS will
continue to contribute to this cost avoidance.”
A
product of...
Navy
Office of Information
www.navy.mil 703.697.5342
June
11, 2008
NAVY Enterprise…a ready and resourced Warfighter….today
and tomorrow
“Our Enterprise effort is primarily focused on how we
interact as a large organization…collaborating and
sharing best practices to improve processes that deliver
results. Not to turn the Navy into a business, but to
understand the business of the Navy so that we remain
the most effective and efficient Navy in the world.”
--Adm.
Gary Roughead, Chief of Naval Operations
Improving Return on Investment is key to maintaining
warfighting readiness and building the future force
•
The Navy is facing significant fiscal pressures. Costs,
particularly manpower, ship and aircraft acquisition,
are projected to continue to increase at a rate
significantly greater than that of inflation. At the
same time, demand for Navy capabilities called for by
the new Maritime Strategy is increasing.
•
In order to execute the Maritime Strategy
cost-effectively, we must strive continually to
understand and improve our Return on Investment (ROI)
through “best use” of limited resources…our people, our
dollars, and our time. NAVY Enterprise supports efforts
within and across Navy headquarters and individual
commands to improve ROI.
NAVY
Enterprise seeks to synchronize efforts across the Navy
by:
•
Improving the output/cost ratio of core Navy processes
•
Setting improvement objectives, measuring progress, and
removing barriers
•
Facilitating improved collaboration and decision making
by tightening the cross-organizational linkages
necessary to deliver warfighting capability effectively
and efficiently both today and tomorrow
•
Developing support tools to maximize resources, improve
process efficiency, and optimize resource allocation
effectiveness
•
Promoting culture change through education, open and
honest communications, and aligned incentives
Everyone has a significant role in improving ROI
•
You can contribute to continuous process improvement in
our Navy by working to continuously improve process
efficiencies, identifying areas of opportunity,
documenting and openly communicating successes,
supporting desired behavior and culture change, and
providing feedback to senior leadership
Key Messages
Facts & Figures
•
NAVY Enterprise is a set of organizational
interrelationships designed to improve effectiveness and
help leadership optimize our finite resources to deliver
warfighting effects today and tomorrow.
•
NAVY Enterprise supports the Maritime Strategy and the
Department of Navy’s broader business transformation
efforts.
•
The Navy is not a business, but we must understand our
business processes and constantly seek to improve them
by applying the right tools, techniques, and procedures.
•
The sheer size of the Navy budget would rank it among
the top 10 of Fortune 500 companies.
•
Approximately two-thirds of Navy’s total budget “flows”
through the Systems Commands and the Manpower,
Personnel, Training and Education (MPT&E) domain.
• Application of commercial industry Continuous
Process Improvement (CPI) tools and best practices
are yielding real savings. For example, NAVSEA Team
Submarine’s use of Lean Six Sigma (LSS) has reduced
acquisition costs for Virginia Class submarines by
17%.
France Schedules Rafale And Hawkeye Aircraft For
Training Aboard US Carrier
(JANE’S NAVY INTERNATIONAL 12
JUN 08) ... J.A.C.
Lewis
Paris - The French Navy is to send
six Rafale F2 standard fighters and two E-2C Hawkeye
airborne early warning aircraft to the United States for
extensive exercises aboard USS Theodore Roosevelt off
Norfolk, Virginia, in July, naval officials in Paris
have confirmed.
The aircraft are to operate aboard
Theodore Roosevelt for four days starting 20 July in an
exercise to help France's naval pilots maintain their
skills during the long lay-up of the French carrier FNS
Charles de Gaulle , which began a refit at its home port
of Toulon last June and will not be fully ready for
service again until January 2009.
The Rafale made its debut on US
vessels in the Arabian Sea in 2003 and two Rafale marine
fighters also practised take-offs and landings aboard
the USS Harry Truman on 21 May 2008 when the carrier
stopped in Marseilles following a six-month tour off
Iraq.
"However, this will be the first
actual deployment of Rafale aboard a US carrier, with an
80-member French team including 12 Rafale pilots, four
Hawkeye crews and 20 technicians being stationed aboard
the carrier for days instead of Rafale merely making
practice runs on deck," a French Navy spokesman told
Jane's .
Accustomed to operating from the
40,000-ton Charles de Gaulle, the French pilots will
need to adjust to the behemoth proportions of the
104,000-ton Theodore Roosevelt. The latter's angled deck
measures 240 m opposed to Charles de Gaulle's 168 m and
its catapults are 95 m in length compared with 75 m on
the French vessel.
Charles de Gaulle's regular lay-ups for maintenance
and particularly the current lengthy overhaul of its
nuclear reactors have been cited by the French Navy
as justification for Paris building a second
aircraft carrier.
Navy Pilot Killed In Collision Over Nevada
Identified
(ASSOCIATED PRESS 15 JUN 08)
FALLON - A Navy pilot killed when
two fighter jets collided over Nevada has been
identified.
The Navy says Lt. Jeremy S. Wise of
Virginia Beach, Va., died following the collision during
a routine training mission Friday between his F/A-18C
Hornet and an F-5 Tiger aircraft.
The 28-year-old Wise, a 4-year
veteran of the Navy, was based at Naval Air Station
Oceana in Virginia Beach.
Two pilots in the other jet
parachuted to safety and were rescued about 50 miles
east of Fallon Naval Air Station, where both jets had
taken off.
Those pilots, whose names were not
released, were released Friday after treatment for minor
injuries at a Fallon hospital.
The cause of the crash is under
investigation by a Navy team.
The wreckage was scattered over a wide area near the
community of Middlegate, about 110 miles east of
Reno.
The F-35B
Lightning II STOVL variant will be the 1st of the 3
variants to be introduced into USMC operational use 4
years from now. Details are below.
FORT
WORTH, Texas, June 11th, 2008 --
|
 |
|
The first Lockheed Martin F-35B short
takeoff/vertical landing stealth fighter takes
off from Lockheed Aeronautics in Fort Worth,
Texas, on its inaugural flight Wednesday, June
11.
The jet, which will be used by the U.S. Marine
Corps, the United Kingdom and Italy, is the
first aircraft to combine stealth with
supersonic speed and short takeoff/vertical
landing capability. |
|
High-Resolution
Photo |
With
test pilot Graham Tomlinson at the controls, the short
takeoff/vertical landing (STOVL) Lockheed Martin [NYSE:
LMT] F-35B Lightning II streaked into blue Texas skies
Wednesday, marking the first flight of an aircraft that
will provide a combination of capabilities never before
available: stealth, supersonic speed and STOVL basing
flexibility.
Tomlinson, a former Royal Air Force Harrier pilot now
employed by BAE Systems, performed a conventional
takeoff at 10:17 a.m. CDT from Lockheed Martin’s Fort
Worth facility. As planned, all initial F-35B flights
will be made using conventional takeoffs and landings,
with transitions to short takeoffs, hovers and vertical
landings beginning early next year. Tomlinson guided the
jet to 15,000 feet and performed a series of handling
tests, engine-power variations and subsystems checks
before landing at 11:01 a.m. CDT.
"A
great team effort led to a relaxed first flight, with
the aircraft handling and performing just as we
predicted based on STOVL simulator testing and flying
the F-35A," Tomlinson said. The F-35B, known as BF-1,
becomes the second Lightning II to enter flight test,
preceded by the conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL)
F-35A, which first flew in December 2006 and has
completed 43 flights. The F-35B that flew today is the
second of 19 System Development and Demonstration
aircraft and the first to incorporate new weight-saving
design features that will apply to all future F-35
aircraft.
Though nearly identical in appearance to the F-35A, the
F-35B incorporates a counter-rotating shaft-driven lift
fan positioned directly behind the cockpit. The lift
fan, produced by Rolls-Royce, is turned by a drive shaft
from the F-35’s massively powerful single engine, which
features a swiveling rear exhaust nozzle that vectors
thrust downward during vertical flight. The lift fan,
engine and stabilizing roll ducts beneath the F-35B’s
wings combine to produce 40,000 pounds of lifting force.
Converting the F-35B from STOVL to conventional flight
and vice-versa requires only the push of a button by the
pilot. The system otherwise operates automatically.
"We're absolutely convinced that this aircraft is going
to only further enhance what is a tremendous asymmetric
advantage that we hold in terms of controlling the air,
taking advantage of intelligence, surveillance and
reconnaissance capabilities, multi-sensor capabilities,
and the ability, if need be, to drop a bomb in a
precision strike," said Gen. James Conway, Commandant of
the U.S. Marine Corps.
The
F-35B will be the first of the three Lightning II
variants to achieve Initial Operational Capability,
beginning with the Marines in 2012. The STOVL variant
also will be used by the United Kingdom’s Royal Air
Force and Royal Navy, and Italy’s Air Force and Navy.
With the capability to operate from a variety of ships
or austere runways, the F-35B can deploy closer to shore
or near front lines, shrinking distance and time to the
target, increasing sortie rates and greatly reducing the
need for support assets.
"This is truly an historic day for aviation and the JSF
program," said Maj. Gen. C.R. Davis, F-35 program
executive officer. "It caps a commitment we made in
August 2006 to the Department of Defense and the U.S.
Marine Corps when we said we would fly a
production-representative STOVL F-35 by June of 2008 –
and the team did it. This flight is also a milestone in
a 5,000-sortie flight test program that spans five years
but continuously rolls out incremental F-35 war fighting
capability. It’s a proud day and proud beginning."
"The
STOVL aircraft represents the ideal balance of form and
function. It uniquely meets the warfighter’s demanding
requirements with 5th Generation capabilities
to deliver lethality, survivability, supportability and
affordability," said Dan Crowley, Lockheed Martin
executive vice president and F-35 program general
manager. "The quality of this aircraft reflects the
talent of the worldwide design and manufacturing team
who made today’s flight possible."
The
United States and eight international participants are
involved in the F-35’s funding, development, production
and sustainment. Three versions of the F-35 will be
produced:
-
F-35A CTOL
variant for conventional runways
-
STOVL F-35B for
operating off small ships and near front-line combat
zones
-
And the F‑35C
carrier variant (CV) for catapult launches and
arrested recoveries aboard the U.S. Navy’s large
aircraft carriers.
All
19 F-35 flight-test and ground-test aircraft are in
production flow or on the flightline, and assembly has
begun on the first two production-model F-35s.
The
F-35 Lightning II is a supersonic, multi-role, 5th
generation stealth fighter. The three F-35 variants are
derived from a common design and use the same
sustainment infrastructure worldwide to replace at least
13 types of aircraft for 11 nations initially, making
the Lightning II the most cost-effective fighter program
in history.
Lockheed Martin is developing the F-35 with its
principal industrial partners, Northrop Grumman and BAE
Systems. BAE Systems also is the prime contractor for
the Royal Navy's next two aircraft carriers, from which
the United Kingdom’s 138 F-35Bs will operate.
Two
separate, interchangeable F-35 engines are under
development: the Pratt & Whitney F135, which powered
today’s flight, and the GE Rolls-Royce Fighter Engine
Team F136.
Headquartered in Bethesda, Md., Lockheed Martin
employs about 140,000 people worldwide and is
principally engaged in the research, design,
development, manufacture, integration and
sustainment of advanced technology systems, products
and services. The Corporation reported 2007 sales of
$41.9 billion.
Stennis' Cat 1 Launches 50,000th Aircraft
Story
Number: NNS080612-12
Release Date: 6/12/2008 2:54:00 PM
By
Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class (SW) Elliott J.
Fabrizio, USS John C. Stennis Public Affairs
USS JOHN C. STENNIS, At Sea (NNS) -- The crew of
Stennis launched their 50,000th aircraft off
catapult, June 8.
"Reaching this milestone represents all of the hard
work we put in manning up and maintaining these
catapults," said Aviation Boatswain's Mate Equipment
1st Class Richard Dawson, bow catapult leading petty
officer.
In recognizing their 50,000th launch, the Sailors
from the bow catapult shop celebrated their hard
work.
"There was a celebration right after the 50,000th
shot," said Assistant Catapult Captain, Aviation
Boatswain's Mate 3rd Class Christopher Henry.
"Everyone was yelling, screaming and jumping around.
It just feels good to be a part of this, knowing
that 50,000 aircraft have launched from this
catapult."
The launch and arresting gear division gathered
every Sailor involved in launching aircraft from the
bow catapults for a cake and ice cream party,
formally celebrating their accomplishment.
"I couldn't be more satisfied with their
accomplishment and my ability to be a part of it,"
said Flight Deck Division Officer Lt. Jason Wells,
the "shooter" who launched the 50,000th catapult
shot. "It shows their ability to maintain gear
that's obviously been through a lot. This gear is 14
years old and they still make it work to
perfection."
During each catapult launch, a variety of people
must work together to ensure pilots can safely
takeoff from the flight deck.
Below deck, panel operators verify the catapult's
systems are functioning correctly. Above deck,
topside personnel attach the aircraft to the
catapult's launching shuttle, while safety observers
watch for errors. A shooter then verifies everything
is ready and signals the deck-edge operator to
launch the aircraft.
"Everybody has to do their part perfectly, all day,
to ensure each catapult can launch safely," said
Safety Observer Aviation Boatswain's Mate Equipment
2nd Class Arras Saul. "We can work anywhere from 16
to 20 hours, and then we still have to do
maintenance."
Each catapult requires daily maintenance, and
Sailors from the launch and arresting division work
around the clock to ensure that their catapults are
operational.
"We have 50 required checks each week, and that
doesn't include corrective maintenance," said
Dawson. "We have a least 30 man-hours of work per
person spent running maintenance."
By keeping their equipment running effectively
through continual use, Stennis Sailors are ensuring
their ship maintains operational readiness so it can
fulfill the needs of America's Maritime Strategy.
A Day in
the Navy
13 June
2008
• On June
13th, 331,391 Active Duty, 69,968 Reserve Component
Sailors, with 5,982 Reserves mobilized, and 180,594
civilians are serving in the Department of the Navy.
• 280
active ships are in service. 126 (45%) including 4
carriers and 4 amphibious large deck ships are underway.
•
Approximately 10,000 Individual Augmentees are deployed
on the ground around the world in support of the Global
War on Terror, including 2,650 in Iraq and 1,397 in
Afghanistan.
• Carrier
Air Wing Two, embarked aboard USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN
72) is conducting missions in support of Operation Iraqi
Freedom, having flown more than 800 missions – an
average of 20 a day – in support of our coalition troops
on the ground since arriving in theater only six weeks
ago.
• USNS
Mercy (T-AH 19) departs Cotabato City, Republic of
Philippines, en route to Samar, Republic of Philippines,
to pick up medical and engineering personnel who have
been in the area providing humanitarian assistance in
support of Pacific Partnership 2008. Pacific Partnership
is a four-month humanitarian assistance program that
partners U.S. Navy and U.S. non-governmental
organization personnel with host nation personnel to
conduct assistance projects.
• The U.S.
Cooperation Afloat Readiness and Training (CARAT) task
group is in Sattahip, Thailand, participating in
multiple medical, dental and engineering civil action
projects, community relations events and
military-to-military exchanges. The U.S. CARAT task
group consists of Commander, Destroyer Squadron 1, USS
Tortuga (LSD 46), USS Jarrett (FFG 33), USS Ford (FFG
54), and USCGC Morgenthau (WHEC 722).
• USS
Essex Expeditionary Strike Group is en route Laem
Chabang, Thailand, following participation in Cobra Gold
08, a bilateral exercise with the Thai military. The
group includes USS Essex (LHD 2), USS Juneau (LPD 10),
USS Harpers Ferry (LSD 49), and the embarked 3rd
Marine Expeditionary Brigade from the 31st
Marine Expeditionary Unit.
• USS
Stethem (DDG 63) is in Busan, Republic of Korea,
conducting military-to-military training with the
Republic of Korea Navy. The training is with the crew of
the ROK Navy’s first Aegis KDX III – class destroyer,
Sejong The Great.
• USS
Ronald Reagan Carrier Strike Group is conducting flight
operations with its embarked Carrier Air Wing 14 in the
vicinity of Guam.
The US Navy's trade
studies on whether its Boeing F/A-18 Hornet replacement,
the F/A-XX, should be piloted have concluded that
unmanned air vehicles could operate for 20 times longer
than manned systems in some circumstances.
The studies' details were
revealed at the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems
International North America 2008 symposium in San Diego,
California, and follow January's publication of the
USN's Naval Aviation Vision document, which said: "With
an [initial operating capability] of 2025, [the
navy-unmanned combat air system] is envisioned to be the
strike fighter recapitalisation platform [F/A-XX]".
Studying operational
capabilities, the USN examined an aircraft carrier group
operating at an air tanker "safety line" of 925km
(500nm) from the shore.
Calculating how long
manned and unmanned systems could loiter at 925km from
the fleet, 1,380km and 1,850km, a tailed manned aircraft
could only last for 30min at the middle distance, while
a tail-less UAV could stay for 20.5h. At 1,850km manned
vehicles had zero loiter time.
Speaking at the AUVSI
event, US Naval Air Systems Command programme executive
officer Gary Kessler said: "Manned endurance estimates
[are] conservatively high, while [the] unmanned
endurance estimate is conservatively low."
The USN trades examined
two broad manned and unmanned configurations: one with a
new fuselage, wing and tail and a tail-less Northrop
Grumman X-47B unmanned combat air system
demonstrator-like vehicle.
Assuming both had the
same 460kt (850km/h) cruise speed and unrefuelled
ranges of 3,330km for a vehicle with a tail and
5,550km for the tail-less version, pilot performance
was the manned system's limitation, giving a maximum
mission endurance of 10h, while the UAV, with
refuelling, could achieve 50h.
Navy Awards Boeing, Bell
Team $18.2M Contract
(ASSOCIATED PRESS 19 JUN
08)
WASHINGTON - The Navy
awarded a strategic alliance of Boeing Co. and Textron
Inc.'s Bell Helicopter division an $18.2 million
contract boost to provide engineering and logistics
services to support the MV-22 Osprey, the Defense
Department said late Thursday.
The Osprey, a tiltrotor
vertical/short takeoff and landing aircraft, is jointly
built by Boeing and Bell. Boeing is responsible for the
fuselage and all subsystems, digital avionics and
fly-by-wire flight-control systems, while Bell is
responsible for the wing, transmissions, empennage,
rotor systems and engine installation.
Shares of
Chicago-based Boeing rose $2.30, or 3.1 percent, to
$76.95. Shares of Textron, based in Providence,
R.I., rose 55 cents to $52.74.
CNO Orders Investigation
Of GW Fire
(NAVY TIMES 20 JUN 08)
... Gidget Fuentes
SAN DIEGO — With an
assessment “nearly completed,” of the damage done to the
aircraft carrier George Washington by its May 22 fire,
Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead has ordered
an investigation into what caused the blaze, Navy
officials announced Thursday.
The Judge Advocate
General’s Manual investigation will be headed by the
U.S. Pacific Fleet in Hawaii, fleet officials said in a
statement. The Naval Safety Center in Norfolk, Va., is
convening a safety board and is conducting a separate
safety investigation.
“The Navy is accumulating
lessons learned on this incident to be shared with the
fleet,” said the Pacific Fleet statement.
Meanwhile, the
nuclear-powered aircraft carrier has settled into a
berth at Naval Air Station North Island, Calif., where
it arrived May 27 for what has become a lengthy stay as
repair crews and investigators continue their work. The
George Washington was originally to conduct a turnover
in June in Pearl Harbor with the retiring,
conventionally powered carrier Kitty Hawk, but the
exchange is now scheduled for San Diego in August.
The delay for the George
Washington’s arrival as the new forward-deployed carrier
in Japan doesn’t appear to have further delayed the
Kitty Hawk’s planned decommissioning in Bremerton,
Wash., which officials said would be done “on schedule.”
Navy Secretary Donald
Winter on Thursday toured the George Washington and got
briefs on the damage assessment, repairs and
firefighting efforts by the ship’s crew. Sailors took
four hours to put out the fire, which had spread to
multiple decks and spaces through ventilation and cable
trunks.
“I am impressed with the
manner in which they fought this fire,” Winter said in a
statement. “They worked as a well-trained team to
contain the fire and to ensure the safety of all aboard,
exemplifying the fighting spirit of American sailors.”
Winter also got a closer
look at some of the damaged spaces and has asked for
more details and information on several areas, including
“how the ship’s damage control team fought the fire, and
the extent to which ship modifications may have played a
role with how the fire spread,” he said. “What we learn
here can help us improve our damage control training,
assess our damage control procedures and equipment,
inform future ship alterations and prevent future
accidents of this type.
“Experience has shown
that we must complete the removal of material in the
damaged areas before we can make a full assessment of
the necessary repairs and corrective actions,” he added.
The Navy has not yet
announced what specifically must be repaired or how much
it will cost to do the work, which is being done by
commercial and Navy shipyards.
“I am pleased with the
methodological approach the team has taken in developing
a plan to repair the ship. They are making very good
progress,” Winter said in the statement.
Last August, the George
Washington finished an 11-month, $300 million yard
period at the Northrop Grumman Newport News shipyard in
Virginia. The work included upgrades and modifications
as well as repairs and maintenance to prepare the ship
for its homeport shift from Virginia to Japan.
Damaged Aircraft Carrier
To Stay In Port For Repairs
(SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE
21 JUN 08) ... Steve Liewer
SAN DIEGO - The
fire-damaged aircraft carrier George Washington will
remain in San Diego for repairs until at least August,
Navy officials said.
The ship was traveling
from its former home port of Norfok, Va., to its new
home in Yokosuka, Japan, when it caught fire May 22,
causing minor injuries to two dozen sailors. It arrived
at North Island Naval Air Station in Coronado five days
later for a damage assessment.
Navy officials said they
still don't know what caused the blaze. The fire damaged
80 of the ship's 3,800 rooms, and it burned or melted
huge bundles of electrical cables.
Inspectors have not
determined how much the repairs will cost, said Jon
Yoshishige, a spokesman for the Navy's Pacific Fleet
command.
The George Washington was
scheduled to exchange personnel and equipment with the
aircraft carrier Kitty Hawk – the ship it is replacing
in Japan – at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, in early June. Then
it was going to participate in RIMPAC 2008, an
international naval exercise conducted near Hawaii every
two years, from June 29 to July 31.
Now the Kitty Hawk will
replace the George Washington as the only aircraft
carrier in the exercise. The turnover of crew and
equipment between the two ships has been rescheduled for
August in San Diego, Yoshishige said.
Afterward, the Kitty Hawk
will continue to Bremerton to be mothballed and
decommissioned in January.
===============================
For Navy Aircraft
Carriers, 'Missions Haven't Changed'
(NATIONAL DEFENSE JULY
2008) ... Grace V. Jean
ABOARD THE USS THEODORE
ROOSEVELT — After spending nine months in the shipyard
last year for routine maintenance, this 24-year-old
Nimitz-class aircraft carrier and her crew are preparing
for the ship’s fourth deployment to the Persian Gulf
since 9/11.
“The missions haven’t
changed,” says Capt. Ladd Wheeler, the ship’s commanding
officer.
The primary goal is to
support troops on the ground, he says. The TR’s fighter
pilots will serve as the eyes for Army and Marine Corps
units in Iraq.
“Every flight, you’re
talking to a guy on the ground, and you’re providing
some service to him that seems to benefit him. It might
not be bomb dropping, but it’s still a very critical
mission,” says Capt. Dan Dixon, the carrier air wing
commander.
“If our use is just for
building a better picture for the folks on the ground,
that’s great. If called upon to do a low fly-by and make
noise, that’s great. If called upon to strafe or drop
bombs, we’re ready to do that as well,” he adds.
In an exercise in the
Atlantic Ocean several hundred miles off the East Coast,
warplanes are flying 90 to 100 sorties a day practicing
strike warfare — dropping ordnance on target ranges in
Florida, talking to joint terminal attack controllers
who call in air support and conducting fly-bys, or
shows-of-force.
Pilots also are
practicing night strafing, which is something they
didn’t always do in training, says Dixon.
The TR will deploy with a
typical carrier air wing that is composed of seven
squadrons: four strike fighter squadrons with 44 F/A-18
Hornets and Super Hornets, a squadron of E-2 Hawkeyes, a
squadron of EA-6B Prowlers, a squadron of SH-60
helicopters and two C-2 Greyhound logistics aircraft,
known as CODs.
Pilots are arriving in
“incredible shape,” Dixon says.
Almost half of the
aircrew has never been on deployment. “Part of what
we’re doing now is stressing them in the exercise so
that they’re not overwhelmed when they get over to
Iraq,” says Dixon.
In this conflict, it is
important to have precise information about the location
of targets so that if a weapon is dropped, civilians are
not harmed. “There are strategic implications of a bomb
that goes astray,” says Dixon. “In an urban environment,
it’s important that we only affect the folks that the
ground troops want us to affect, and nobody else. That’s
the challenge.”
On the ship’s 2005
deployment, the wing’s aircraft ranked among the oldest
in the fleet by a decade because they included the last
F-14 Tomcat squadron, says Dixon. But when the air wing
returned home, the Tomcat squadron transitioned to
brand-new F/A-18E and F Super Hornets, which reduced the
average age of aircraft dramatically.
The wing still has the
oldest E-2s, an old version of the EA-6B Prowler, and
the F/A-18A-plus Hornets, which are 20 years old.
The air wing received new
reconnaissance pods, which are aircraft-mounted sensors.
“It’s a big plus for us to learn how to use that,” says
Dixon. The wing also is beginning to operate the
advanced electronically scanned array (AESA) radar,
which is new to the Navy.
In Iraq, the EA-6B
Prowler is in high demand because of its electronic
warfare capabilities. “That’s the number one priority,”
says Dixon. The squadron will receive the new EA-6G
Growlers when they come back from deployment. “They’re
excited about that. They’re going to have a new AESA
radar in the front and it’s going to be a huge step up
in their capabilities,” he says.
The TR deploys later this
fall for a six- to seven-month cruise.
One of the threats they
may encounter in the Persian Gulf are small boats,
commanders say. In January, five fast boats operated by
the Iranian Revolutionary Guard confronted three Navy
warships, and in March, a lone Egyptian motorboat
approached a U.S.-flagged cargo ship and was fired upon.
Intelligence officers here say the Navy does not have
sufficient visibility of the threat, and that tracking
the number of small boats is difficult given the limited
surveillance technology available on the carrier.
Commanders say they need more access to imagery and
streaming video aboard the ship.
“They do operate with
media that require larger processing and larger
pixels to get their job done,” says Wheeler. “I can
see that they might be interested in getting more
bandwidth, but I would be more interested in getting
better formatting and packaging,” to enable large
files to be sent and received.
Report Urges Navy To Push Unmanned Flight Envelope
(STAR-TELEGRAM (TEXAS) 24 JUN
08) ... Bob Cox
On Dec. 6, 1941, the Navy had been
experimenting for years with aircraft carriers and warplanes
but still wasn’t sure what role they would play in future
naval battles.
A day later, Japanese bombers launched
from aircraft carriers laid waste to much of the Pacific
Fleet at Pearl Harbor and the Navy knew that its future sea
battles would largely be fought by planes, not battleships.
Now the Navy is faced with another
possible turning point in combat strategy and tactics:
unmanned combat aircraft. Two respected defense analysts say
that, unlike in the years before World War II, the Navy is
moving too slowly to explore the uses of this potentially
revolutionary technology.
In a 260-page study released last week,
analysts from the Center for Strategic and Budgetary
Assessment in Washington argue that unmanned aircraft have
the potential to greatly expand the striking power of the
Navy’s carrier battle groups.
"From our perspective, this provides
something the aircraft carrier has never had — extremely
long range, persistent strike capability," center analyst
Bob Work said.
Unmanned aircraft can fly much farther
without refueling. And without a human in the cockpit, they
can fly for many hours, even days, on end. That extended
range and persistence could allow Navy carriers to fight and
launch repeated attacks from well outside the range of an
enemy’s air and land-based missile systems.
"This system ensures the long-term
relevance of the aircraft carrier fleet," said Work, who
served in the Marines. Work co-wrote the study with
colleague Tom Ehrhard, a retired Air Force officer.
The Navy last year awarded Northrop
Grumman a $636 million contract to build two unmanned
aircraft known as the X-47B. The X-47B would be used to
demonstrate the capability of an unmanned aircraft to
operate off a carrier deck.
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics is working
with Northrop on the design and manufacturing of the X-47B’s
composite flight control surfaces, Lockheed spokesman Joe
Stout said. Personnel in both Lockheed’s Skunk Works
facility in Palmdale, Calif., and in Fort Worth are
involved.
Lockheed continues to work on its own
unmanned aircraft technology, Stout said, but declined to
give specific examples.
The Navy has set modest goals for the
X-47B program, Work said. Navy officials working on future
requirements and budget planning don’t appear to consider
the development of an unmanned combat aircraft a high
priority.
"The Navy’s conservative approach . . .
suggests that the carrier community is reticent to fully
embrace the new system," Work said. "We’re very anxious to
see [the Navy’s 2010 budget proposal] come out to see if
[the X-47B program] survives."
Senior Navy officials have many
high-priority programs they would like to pay for, such as
new ships and the F-35 joint strike fighter. The temptation
will be to take money intended for the X-47B program — an
estimated $1 billion through 2013 — to help pay other bills.
Key members of Congress and top
Pentagon officials should take a strong interest in unmanned
combat aircraft development and make sure the Navy includes
money in future budgets, Work said.
The experience of U.S. forces in
Afghanistan and Iraq has shown both the potential for
unmanned aircraft operations and the need to get around
limitations on manned flights.
Airstrikes from unmanned Predators
loitering for long periods high above potential targets have
proven a valuable tactic. Manned aircraft are also being
required to loiter for long periods while awaiting orders to
strike targets, but are limited by the endurance of the men
and women flying them.
There is little doubt, Work says, that
an unmanned combat aircraft can be built that will fly
farther, can be refueled in midair repeatedly and stay in
the air for days at a time, and carry equal or greater
weapons loads. Unmanned aircraft can be built that are even
less visible to radar than the stealthy F-35.
For the Navy, this would mean greatly
extending the striking power of a carrier air wing and
enabling it to operate out of the range of enemy missiles.
China’s military strategy in the case
of a confrontation with the U.S. over Taiwan, Work says,
calls for being able to attack the Navy’s carrier battle
groups with missiles well before they can get in current
aircraft striking range.
Neither Work nor Ehrhard is a pilot.
But the discussion isn’t about choosing between manned or
unmanned aircraft, Work says, adding that there’s a place
for both. An aircraft carrier equipped with both unmanned
strike aircraft and the F-35C Lightning II, Work said, would
be a potent weapons system.
The Navy's effort to develop an
aircraft carrier based unmanned combat aircraft system (UCAS)
is absolutely critical to the service, but the Navy must
demonstrate that the system can be safely integrated onto a
ship and it must have the support of congress and the
Pentagon for UCAS to survive, according to the Center for
Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA).
The Navy's Unmanned Combat Air
System-Demonstrator (UCAS-D) and the eventual follow-on,
Navy (N)-UCAS, face a rough road, according to CSBA's Tom
Ehrhard and Robert Work.
Ehrhard and Work published a 240-page
study examining the need for UCAS. The study was released
last week.
"There is a high degree of skepticism,"
Work told reporters last week at a briefing at CSBA in
Washington, D.C.
"Carrier air wings have never ever been
a fan of this," he added.
In August 2007 the Navy awarded
Northrop Grumman [NOC] a $1 billion contract to build two
UCAS demonstrators. The goal of the program is to
demonstrate a carrier landing by 2013, Work noted.
If the demonstration effort is
successful, and backers of UCAS-D are able to convince
skeptics that a carrier-based unmanned system is feasible,
the Navy could initially pursue an intelligence,
surveillance and reconnaissance unmanned aircraft.
There has been some discussion,
however, of adding N-UCAS to the mix of potential follow-ons
to the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet out in the 2025 time frame.
That effort is dubbed F/A-XX, Work noted.
"I don't think Tom and I would say that
in 2025 it's a sure bet that a UCAS would be able to
duplicate everything a manned combat system would be able to
do," Work said. "But there are certain things a UCAS can do
infinitely better than a manned system."
And moving N-UCAS that far to the right
could doom the program, he added.
"Now the Navy is talking about the
earliest they would put an unmanned system on a carrier deck
is 2025," he said. "We believe that this suggest the Navy is
not truly sold on this system."
More to the point, Work said he saw
this discussion as the first bureaucratic move to kill the
program.
It's a good idea for the Navy to stick
to a demonstration program and technical maturation effort,
Work said, to prove the system works, that it can be built
for a reasonable cost, that it performs as expected, and
more importantly to see what "cool things operators dream up
to use this [for] during its test program."
"I don't believe it would be good to
jump to an operational system," he added. "It is absolutely
important to go through this first stage."
Work said it is also important to keep
an eye on the Program Objective Memorandum (POM)10.
"If [the Navy] keeps the UCAS-D program
or if they try to accelerate it, that would be a very good
sign. But if they say 'we don't really need it until
2025...we probably can move the demonstration to 2018...that
billion dollars looks good...' you know this system is going
to suffer defense infanticide," he explained.
The technical maturation program is
also very important, Work added. "Not only do you have to
demonstrate that the system can operate safely, you want to
give it all of the tools to make it even more capable."
"At the end of the day, it has to be
supported independently by the test community," Ehrhard
said. "This demonstration program is very important to the
N-UCAS."
Ehrhard and Work both pointed out the
advantages N-UCAS will bring to the Navy in the ability to
provide greater range, persistence, stealth and networking.
"N-UCAS will transform the aircraft
carrier, which right now has unlimited global mobility but
extremely short tactical reach, into a global long-range and
persistent strike system," Work said. "It has enormous
implications for the carrier fleet."
Current carrier aircraft, such as the
F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, for example, have a range of upward
of 500 nautical miles. N-UCAS would be able to improve upon
that range by two to three times, Ehrhard said.
Additionally, the tailless design of
Northrop Grumman's system allows it to have a "much greater
level of stealth on all azimuths than a design that looks
like F-35," Ehrhard said.
F-35 is Lockheed Martin's [LMT] Joint
Strike Fighter.
"So you are also talking about the
ability to not only range these targets but to be
operationally effective in this environment," he added.
Additionally, N-UCAS could remain on
station for upward of 40 to 50 hours with refueling, Work
noted.
N-UCAS would also contribute to the
concept of crisis stability, Ehrhard said.
"When you have a system, for instance,
that forces the PRC (Peoples Republic of China) to buy a lot
of air defense systems...a very stealthy deep strike
system...this contributes to crisis stability in the
region," he explained. "Those are offensive systems they
cannot buy. Those are systems they can't be 100 percent sure
of, so their willingness to take offensive action will be
diminished because they can never be sure their attack
systems on the mainland would be protected. So the U.S.
should be pursuing systems that contribute to crisis
stability in the region as part of our over-arching
strategic approach to defense strategy in the future. The N-UCAS
system would be a major move forward in terms of east Asia
crisis stability."
But for all the potential advantages N-UCAS
offers, it has received little, if any, support from
aviators, Ehrhard said.
"The skepticism is so thick in the
naval aviation community.