|
CONTENTS:
Membership
Donation Form
Photo
Gallery
Air
Stations
Reunions
Special
Articles
Other
Sites
Contact Us
|
BULLHORN #14
4 September 2007
ANAers!!
Summer vacations
are drawing to a close – the children are headed back to school – and
all are buckling down to work again. We hope everyone has had the
opportunity to relax, be with family, and enjoy some of this wonderful
country in which we are blessed to live.
Work at ANA
continues, as does some wonderful work in our squadrons, as our
President, VADM Dunn, will soon cover in his next HOWGOZIT.
We are still
working the issue of members who are “snow birds” – if you are one who
spends some of summer and winter in different places, please let me know
the time periods and what addresses at which you can receive snail mail
so I can put that information in our membership database.
I have attached a
number of news articles.
Every member get a
member!!!!
Best regards,
Dutch Rauch
Secretary/Treasurer
Association of Naval Aviation
1446 Waggaman Circle
McLean, VA 22101
703-893-3955
**********
Executive Director and Editor, WINGS OF GOLD = Zip at goldwings@verizon.net
**********
www.anahq.org
General Membership:
2550 Huntington Ave, Suite 202
Alexandria, VA 22303
703-960-6806
Ann at
anahqtr@aol.com
**********
“…to
educate and encourage an interest among the general public as to the
importance of Naval Aviation in the defense of the United States and its
allies….”
Stennis, CVW-9 Return to San Diego
Story Number: NNS070827-25
Release Date: 8/27/2007 5:59:00 PM
By Mass Communication Specialist 2nd
Class (SW) Christopher Gethings, USS John C. Stennis Public Affairs
SAN DIEGO (NNS) -- The John C.
Stennis Carrier Strike Group (JCSSG) returned to San Diego Aug. 27,
marking the successful end of deployment for Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 9
and the guided-missile cruiser USS Antietam (CG 54).
While deployed, JCSSG supported Operations Enduring Freedom (OEF) and
Iraqi Freedom (OIF), maritime security operations, coalition operations
in the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations (AOO), Expeditionary Strike
Force training and most recently, Exercise Valiant Shield 2007.
JCSSG departed San Diego Jan. 20 and entered the 5th Fleet’s AOO one
month later, where the strike group spent five months supporting OEF and
OIF.
“The performance of the John C. Stennis Strike Group has been
magnificent,” said Commander, Carrier Strike Group 3 Rear Adm. Kevin M.
Quinn. “I couldn’t be more proud of them. Contributing to security and
stability in the Middle East, as well as the Pacific is one of the most
important missions of the United States Navy.”
Stennis, CVW-9 and the strike group supported combat operations over
Afghanistan from the North Arabian Sea, and over Iraq from the Persian
Gulf while in 5th Fleet. During OIF and OEF, CVW-9 flew approximately
8,000 sorties providing more than 22,000 flight hours, dropped more than
160 bombs and expended more than 11,000 rounds of ammunition during 82
strafing runs.
“The operations we did for our troops in Afghanistan and Iraq, we did
those in support of troops on the ground, troops in contact with enemy
forces, and our aircraft came in and provided the support they needed,
which in some cases was the difference between life and death for our
troops,” added Quinn. “Through [CVW-9’s] precision bombing and their
precision strafing in support of troops on the ground, they helped
achieve our national objectives in that area and more importantly, they
helped save the lives of our troops who were in direct contact with the
enemy in Afghanistan.”
While supporting combat operations, CVW-9 conducted a variety of
missions, including close-air support for troops in combat on the
ground, command and control operations as well as surface search and
surveillance, ensuring the safe operation of the strike group at sea.
“The missions we sent into Afghanistan and Iraq and the strong presence
we established in the Persian Gulf made a very significant difference in
providing security and stability to the entire region,” said Stennis’
Commanding Officer, Capt. Brad Johanson.
As a Combined Forces Air Component Command asset, CVW-9 integrated
closely with multinational coalition forces to prevent and counter
attacks. The carrier-based aircraft provided close air-power support and
delivered ordnance on enemy positions designated by ground forces.
“CVW-9 provided a variety of efforts both kinetic and non-kinetic,” said
Capt. Sterling Gilliam, commander, CVW-9. “We were tasked with close-air
support, reconnaissance and other tactical missions while operating in
support of OEF and OIF.”
Along with five months of combat operations in 5th Fleet, JCSSG also
participated in a number of exercises during its deployment, such as a
unique humanitarian relief exercise in the Persian Gulf, dual-carrier
exercises with USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) and Expeditionary
Strike Force training with USS Nimitz (CVN 68) and USS Bonhomme Richard
(LHD 6) while simultaneously providing close-air support to coalition
ground forces in support of OEF and OIF.
“The support for the troops on the ground and in combat is by far the
most significant thing we did,” Gilliam said. “But what I really am
proud of, is that from the moment we pushed away from the pier, we took
an aggressive operational mindset to make sure that we were combat ready
and kept it until our mission was complete.”
Antietam served as the air defense commander for Stennis during JCSSG’s
deployment.
“Antietam performed outstandingly across the board,” said Quinn. “She
was right there with us in the North Arabian Sea when we were conducting
strike operations into Afghanistan, literally saving the lives of our
troops on the ground. She was with us when we transited the Straits of
Hormuz and went up to the North Persian Gulf to conduct operations in
support of our troops on the ground in Iraq. She also participated in
several multinational exercises to develop the capabilities of those
regional navies.”
After successfully completing operations in the 5th Fleet AOO July 11,
JCSSG sailed to the U.S. 7th Fleet area of responsibility where Sailors
and Marines enjoyed port visits in Singapore and Hong Kong and
participated in more than 20 community relations projects.
Following the visit to Hong Kong, JCSSG participated in exercise Valiant
Shield 2007 off the coast of Guam from Aug. 7 to Aug. 14. The joint
military exercise brought together more than 30 ships including the
Kitty Hawk and Nimitz Carrier Strike Groups, 280 aircraft and more than
20,000 service members from the Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps and Coast
Guard. Valiant Shield tested the military’s ability to rapidly bring
together joint forces in response to any regional contingency,
demonstrating the United States’ commitment to ensuring peace and
stability throughout the Asian-Pacific region.
Next on Stennis’ plate is a docked, planned, incremental availability
period where it will go through about six months of maintenance and
upgrades.
CVW-9 will also go through some changes before embarking Stennis again:
Sea Control Squadron (VS) 31 will disestablish, Strike Fighter Squadron
(VFA) 147 will transition from the F/A-18C Hornet to the F/A-18E Super
Hornet, Helicopter Anti-Submarine Squadron (HS) 8 will become Helicopter
Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 8, transitioning from the SH-60 Seahawk to the
H-60S Knight Hawk, and CVW-9 will welcome Helicopter Maritime Strike
Squadron 71, who fly the MH-60R helicopters.
Gilliam said the rest of the squadrons will take their lessons learned
from this deployment and begin preparing for when CVW-9 embarks Stennis
again next year during work-ups.
JCSSG includes the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis (CVN
74), embarked CVW-9, Destroyer Squadron 21, the guided-missile cruiser
Antietam, the guided-missile destroyers USS O’Kane (DDG 77), USS Preble
(DDG 88) and USS Paul Hamilton (DDG 60) and the fast combat support ship
USNS Bridge (T-AOE 10). More than 6,500 Sailors and Marines are assigned
to JCSSG.
The squadrons of CVW-9 include: the “Black Knights” of VFA-154, “Blue
Diamonds” of VFA-146, “Argonauts” of VFA-147, “Death Rattlers” of Marine
Strike Fighter Squadron 323, “Yellow Jackets” of Electronic Attack
Squadron 138, “Golden Hawks” of Carrier Airborne Early Warning Squadron
112, “Top Cats” of VS-31, “Eightballers” of HS-8 and “Providers” of
Fleet Logistics Support Squadron 30.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
USS George
Washington Gets Underway for Sea Trials
Story Number: NNS070827-24
Release Date: 8/27/2007 5:46:00 PM
By Mass Communication Specialist
Seaman Tanner Lange, USS George Washington Public Affairs
PORTSMOUTH, Va. (NNS) -- USS George
Washington (GW) (CVN 73) left Norfolk Naval Shipyard on Aug. 27 and
headed for sea trials.
Sea trials, which are expected to be completed later this week, are
traditionally the final hurdle for a shipyard maintenance availability
and are designed to assess GW’s material readiness and ability to rejoin
the fleet as a fully operational unit.
Once complete, GW will return to the U.S. 2nd Fleet to commence final
operational preparations to relieve USS Kitty Hawk (CV 63) as the Navy’s
forward-deployed aircraft carrier in Japan in 2008. The $300 million,
11-month Planned Incremental Availability plus Docking is expected to be
completed on time and within budget.
”Sea trials are really the culmination of a lot of hard work. Norfolk
Naval Shipyard and GW Sailors really came together as a team to produce
an outstanding availability,” said GW Commanding Officer, Capt. Dave
Dykhoff.
The availability was specifically designed to prepare the ship to become
the Navy’s forward deployed aircraft carrier with numerous system
upgrades. One specific accomplishment included the removal and
replacement of the entire main mast and all associated radar and combat
systems.
“The capstone mast upgrade improves the ship’s defensive capabilities
and the reliability of associated systems,” said Combat Systems Officer,
Cmdr. Mark Loose.
While the scheduled trials are expected to tax every Sailor and system
on the ship to ensure full capability, the transition from shipyard to
sea is a welcome one.
“Everyone involved is extremely proud to clear this hurdle and get these
tests underway,” said Dykhoff. “Our transition to Japan is very
important to our nation’s security, and we have worked very hard to keep
that transition on track.”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From the
Early Bird:
Shreveport (LA) Times
August 26, 2007
Barksdale Bombers Expand B-52's Capabilities
Recreation of historic 1938 mission points to future
By John Andrew Prime
Three
Barksdale Air Force Base B-52s used a modern twist to a historic
mission almost 70 years old to add a dramatic new capability to the
bomber's long list of tricks. Flying almost 10 hours and putting about
3,500 miles under their wings Friday, the trio of veteran bombers
pinpointed a specific ship several hundred miles east of Bermuda then
spent two hours gathering images and information about it. In May
1938, three B-17 bombers from what was then the 2nd Bomb Group
intercepted the Italian cruise liner Rex several hundred miles east of
New York City. Friday's mission, called Rex Redux, quickly found the
target, said the Military Sealift Command's USNS 2nd Lt. John P. Bobo.
The B-52s then electronically shipped intelligence gathered by a
targeting pod, called LITENING, to planners on land, who in a war or
emergency could have directed the bombers to take further action. The
three B-52s represented the range of cooperation involved in
transforming LITENING into a cyber-age weapon married to the veteran,
versatile and long-range B-52. The mission leader was Lt. Col. Robert
Nordberg, of the Air Force Reserve's 93rd Bomb Squadron, which pioneered
the use of LITENING on the B-52. With him was fellow reservist Lt. Col.
Bill "Sleepy" Floyd, one of the foremost developers of the system.
A second
airplane was commanded by Lt. Col. Ricardo Beruvides, of the 49th Test
Squadron. The third was under the command of Lt. Col. James Noetzel, of
the 2nd Bomb Wing's 96th Bomb Squadron. The flight marked the
active-duty Air Force's first such use of LITENING. "It was a first-rate
mission," an exultant Col. Robert Wheeler, new head of the 2nd Bomb
Wing, said during a briefing that followed the bombers' return just
after 6 p.m. "But this is just a first step." Hints of future uses for
the capabilities proved in Friday's mission could come from "targets of
opportunity" tasks the bombers were given on their leg home. They were
sent to give reports on selected targets, from a dam on a lake to an
airport parking ramp, exactly the targets terrorists might wish to
destroy or that could be damaged in natural disasters.
The impetus
for the mission came from the highest echelons of the Air Force. Gen.
T. Michael Moseley, the service's chief of staff, suggested the Rex
mission of 1938 as a model for a demonstration of the new capabilities
of the LITENING/B-52 team. The May 1938 mission caused some furor with
other branches of the military, which saw the air strike capability as
an assault on entrenched and historic means of defending the nation.
"The airmen
generated a great deal of heat over the mission," Moseley wrote of his
troops at Barksdale. "But the image was forever burned in the minds of
folks."
Follow-up email
traffic regarding the article above
The USAF acquired 84 AGM-84-series Harpoon missiles in August 1984 that
had been originally sold to Iran. Since then, there have been several
exercises in which B-52s have launched Harpoons at surface ship targets
(I watched a video of one, where the immobile hulk of a former Navy
174-ft. fuel lighter was well and truly squashed), at least one of them
fairly recently. I've never seen anything about them getting additional
Harpoons, however, and the existing ones must be due for overhaul or
retirement (like most of the USN's, alas).
Iran, however,
is still doing nicely off USN spares, thanks to DoD surplus sales;
Jane's Defence Weekly this week has an interesting article about the
return to service of a large number of Iranian Air Force F-14As, thanks
to the ingenuity of Iranian technicians and the ready availability of
spare parts on the world market. We have met the enemy and he is us.
On Aug 28,
2007
The original
"mission" was typical Air Corps grandstanding.
They knew the
ship's course, and since she was broadcasting more or less continuously
even Army pilots could find her. Normally they couldn't find anything
at sea out of sight of land, even when given Lat/Long (I trust they
don't plan to recreate the anti-ship track record of the B-17 when
called upon to do the real thing, not a stunt. I would have
thought a
more timely recreation, in tune with the joint and air-ground era we
live in, would be the use of USN tacair to provide close air support to
the Army in its Louisiana Maneuvers a couple of years lately.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Nimitz Strike
Group Wraps up Hong Kong Visit
Story Number: NNS070828-26
Release Date: 8/28/2007 4:39:00 PM
By Mass Communication Specialist
Seaman Matthew J. Lanese, USS Nimitz Public Affairs
USS NIMITZ, At Sea (NNS) -- USS
Nimitz (CVN 68) departed Hong Kong Aug. 24 after a four-day port visit.
The stop was the ship’s third port visit since departing its homeport of
San Diego for a regularly scheduled deployment April 2.
Nimitz, along with embarked Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 11, was joined by the
five other ships in the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG) - the
guided-missile destroyers USS John Paul Jones (DDG 53), USS Chafee (DDG
90), USS Pinckney (DDG 91) and USS Higgins (DDG 76); and the
guided-missile cruiser USS Princeton (CG 59).
The crew of more than 5,000 Sailors and Marines served as American
ambassadors during their visit, participating in community relations
projects, meeting local citizens, experiencing local customs and
traditions and enjoying the many recreational activities offered in Hong
Kong.
“The [community relations] projects were a great success for the
volunteers and the organizations we assisted,” said Lt. Cmdr. David
Bynum, a chaplain aboard Nimitz. “We had opportunities to do hundreds of
hours of volunteer work that would have taken these sites days or weeks
to accomplish.”
Commanded by Capt. Mike Manazir, Nimitz arrived in the U.S. 5th Fleet
(C5F) area of operations in May. While operating in C5F, CVW-11 flew
more than 2,600 sorties and 7,332 hours in support of ground forces
participating in Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom before
leaving the Persian Gulf in late July.
Nimitz and embarked CVW-11 are now operating as a part of the U.S. 7th
Fleet (C7F). Operating in the Western Pacific and Indian Ocean, C7F is
the largest of the forward-deployed U.S. fleets covering 52 million
square miles, with approximately 50 ships, 120 aircraft and more than
22,000 Sailors and Marines assigned at any given time.
CVW-11’s squadrons include “Tophatters” of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA)
14, “Black Aces” of VFA-41, “Sunliners” of VFA-81, “Wallbangers” of
Airborne Early Warning Squadron 117, “Red Devils” of Marine Corps Strike
Fighter Squadron 232, “Black Ravens” of Electronic Warfare Squadron 135,
“Providers” of Carrier Logistics Support Squadron 30 and the “Indians”
of Helicopter Anti-Submarine Squadron 6.
Commanded by Rear Adm. Terry Blake, the Nimitz CSG also includes
embarked Destroyer Squadron 23; Helicopter Anti-submarine Squadron Light
(HSL) 49 “Scorpions,” HSL-37 “Easy Riders,” and Explosive Ordnance
Disposal Unit 11, Det. 3.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Status of the Navy 27AUG07
Navy
Personnel
Active Duty:
339,579
Officers: 52,152
Enlisted: 282,992
Midshipmen: 4,435
Ready Reserve:
113,828 [As of 18 June]
Selected Reserves: 56,850
Individual Ready Reserve: 56,978
Reserves currently
mobilized: 5,238 [As of 27 Aug]
Personnel on
deployment: 66,076
Navy Department
Civilian Employees: 176,659
Ships and Submarines
Deployable Battle
Force Ships: 277
Ships Underway (away from homeport):
148
ships (53% of total)
On
deployment:
120
ships (43% of total)
Attack submarines underway (away from homeport):
30
submarines (55%)
On
deployment:
23
submarines (42%)
Ships Underway
Carriers:
USS Kitty Hawk (CV 63) - South China Sea
USS Enterprise (CVN 65) - Persian Gulf
USS Nimitz (CVN 68) - South China Sea
USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74) - Pacific Ocean
Amphibious Warfare Ships:
USS Nassau (LHA 4) _ Atlantic Ocean
USS Peleliu (LHA 5) - Pacific Ocean
USS Wasp (LHD 1) - Atlantic Ocean
USS Kearsarge (LHD 3) - Mediterranean Sea
USS Boxer (LHD 4) - Pacific Ocean
USS Bohomme Richard (LHD 6) - Persian Gulf
Aircraft (operational): 4000+
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Aug. 27 airpower summary: Stratotankers
help fuel the fleet
8/28/2007 - SOUTHWEST ASIA (AFPN) -- Coalition
airpower supported coalition ground forces in Iraq and International
Security Assistance Force troops in Afghanistan during operations August
27, according to Combined Air and Space Operations Center officials
here.
In
Afghanistan, Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt IIs targeted enemies near
Kandahar with cannon rounds. The on-scene joint terminal attack
controller reported the rounds hit their intended targets.
Other A-10s conducted multiple shows of force with flares to stop enemy
troops from reattacking coalition forces in Asmar. Coalition forces
weren't engaged while the A-10s were overhead.
Also
in Asmar, an Air Force F-15E Strike Eagle showed force over a convoy
that had been attacked. The aircrew watched over the convoy during the
medical evacuation that followed.
F-15Es dropped guided bomb unit 38s and 31s on enemy firing positions
around Orgun-E. The aircraft engaged after a convoy was attacked from
those positions. The weapon drops were considered successful by the JTAC.
Also
in Orgun-E, a French Mirage 2000 and a Mirage F-1C dropped GBU-12s on
enemy personnel.
Another Mirage 2000 provided a show of force with flares for a friendly
convoy moving through Qal-E-Naw.
A-10s provided overwatch and cover for a medical evacuation in Jalalabad.
A ground convoy came under small-arms fire and an improvised explosive
device blast, which prompted the evacuation.
F-15Es dropped GBU-12s on enemies in a tree line in Kajaki Dam. Later,
the aircrew attacked enemies in a building with a GBU-38. The desired
effect was achieved from the engagements. One of the F-15Es provided a
show of force to ensure ground forces could exit the area safely.
A-10s provided successful shows of force with flares to keep enemies
from attacking ground forces in Kabul and Gereshk.
An
F-15E also conducted a successful show of force with flares in Garmsir.
Air
Force B-1B Lancers provided successful shows of force with flares to
ward off enemy attacks in Garmsir and Farah.
In
total, 50 close-air-support missions were flown in support of ISAF and
Afghan security forces, reconstruction activities and route patrols.
Eight Air Force intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft
flew missions in support of operations in Afghanistan. Additionally, two
Royal Air Force aircraft performed tactical reconnaissance.
In
Iraq, Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcons used GBU-38s to destroy a building
being used as a vehicle-born IED factory and trigger hideout in Fallujah.
An
Air Force MQ-1 Predator fired a Hellfire missile at insurgents in
Baqubah. The weapon impacted its targets. RAF GR-4 Tornados watched over
the Hellfire missile impact area afterward.
Also
in Baqubah, Navy F/A-18 Hornets fired cannon rounds at enemies in a
building. The enemies were using the building as cover while firing on
ground forces.
Another F/A-18 conducted a successful show of force with flares in Al
Kut.
Other F/A-18s conducted a show of force and armed overwatch over areas
in Samarra. The pilots also spotted IED emplacers and passed their
location along to the JTAC. The emplacers were apprehended by a quick
response force.
F-16s and A-10s provided multiple shows of force over areas in Al
Mahmudiyah. The pilots also watched over friendly forces in the area.
In
total, coalition aircraft flew 65 close-air-support missions for
Operation Iraqi Freedom. These missions supported coalition ground
forces, protected key infrastructure, provided over watch for
reconstruction activities and helped to deter and disrupt terrorist
activities.
Twenty one Air Force, Navy and RAF ISR aircraft flew missions in support
of operations in Iraq. Additionally, six Navy and RAF aircraft performed
tactical reconnaissance.
Air
Force C-130 Hercules aircraft and C-17 Globemaster IIIs provided
intra-theater heavy airlift support, helping to sustain operations
throughout Afghanistan, Iraq and the Horn of Africa.
Approximately 160 airlift sorties were flown, 510 tons of cargo were
delivered and 3,455 passengers were transported. Airlift included
approximately 43,480 pounds of troop re-supply air-dropped in
Afghanistan.
Coalition C-130 crews from Australia, Canada, Iraq and Japan flew in
support of operations in Afghanistan or Iraq.
On
August 26, Air Force and RAF tankers flew 53 sorties and off-loaded
approximately 3.3 million pounds of fuel to 259 receiving aircraft.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Aug. 28 airpower summary: F-16s stay
close overhead
8/29/2007 - SOUTHWEST ASIA (AFPN) -- Coalition
airpower supported coalition ground forces in Iraq and International
Security Assistance Force troops in Afghanistan during operations Aug.
28, according to Combined Air and Space Operations Center officials
here.
In Afghanistan, Air Force F-15E
Strike Eagles dropped guided bomb unit-38s on Afghanistan National Army
vehicles that were being looted by insurgents in Tarin Kowt. The
aircrews also hit an enemy compound with GBU-38s. The aircrews then
targeted the insurgents with a GBU-31 and GBU-12s. Later, one of the
F-15Es dropped a GBU-12 on an enemy camp. The engagements were reported
as successful.
Also in Tarin Kowt, other F-15Es
dropped GBU-38s on an enemy vehicle and a machine gun position. The
aircrews also attacked with GBU-31s and GBU-12s a sniper position and
enemies fleeing previous attacks. Theses engagements were reported as
successful as well.
Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt IIs
dropped general-purpose 500-pound bombs and GBU-12s on an enemy firing
position in Orgun-E. The pilots also strafed the position with cannon
rounds.
An Air Force B-1B Lancer provided
successful shows of force and presence to ward off enemy attacks in
areas near Ganjabad.
A-10s strafed enemies in Asadabad
with cannon rounds. The on-scene joint terminal attack controller
reported the rounds hit their intended targets.
F-15Es dropped GBU-38s and a GBU-31
on enemy firing positions around Gardez and Asadabad. The weapon drops
were considered successful by the JTAC.
Other F-15Es also hit targets with
GBU-38s and GBU-12s in Asadabad and Asmar.
F-15Es and an A-10 provided
successful shows of force with flares over enemy positions in Gereshk,
Garmsir and Kajaki Dam.
In total, 47 close-air-support
missions were flown in support of ISAF and Afghan security forces,
reconstruction activities and route patrols.
Nine Air Force and Royal Air Force
intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft flew missions in
support of operations in Afghanistan. Additionally, two RAF aircraft
performed tactical reconnaissance.
In Iraq, Air Force F-16 Fighting
Falcons used GBU-38s to destroy a weapons cache in Salman Pak. The
pilots also watched over a coalition raid.
Also in Salman Pak, an F-16
destroyed a weapons crate using a Maverick missile. The pilots observed
insurgents digging up the weapons crate and loading it onto a truck.
Once the crate was unloaded, one of the pilots destroyed it with the
missile. Then, the F-16s strafed the truck that had moved the crate with
cannon rounds until it stopped. One of the F-16s also provided a show of
force for convoy freedom of movement. The convoy moved through smoothly
after the show of force.
Continuing the engagement in Salman
Pak, another group of F-16s fired cannon rounds at the truck that had
moved the weapons crate. The F-16s also hit a weapons storage area with
GBU-38s as well.
An Air Force MQ-1Predator fired a
Hellfire missile at a mortar team in Balad. The Predator followed the
group that was carrying a tube. Eventually the team launched a
projectile, confirming the tube was a weapon. Then the Predator engaged
the team.
F-16s provided shows of force over
locations around Karbala.
Other F-16s patrolled other areas of
Samarra and Tikrit looking for suspicious activities and improvised
explosive devices.
In total, coalition aircraft flew 50
close-air-support missions for Operation Iraqi Freedom. These missions
supported coalition ground forces, protected key infrastructure,
provided over watch for reconstruction activities and helped to deter
and disrupt terrorist activities.
Seventeen Air Force, Navy and RAF
ISR aircraft flew missions in support of operations in Iraq.
Air Force C-130 Hercules aircraft
and C-17 Globemaster IIIs provided intra-theater heavy airlift support,
helping to sustain operations throughout Afghanistan, Iraq and the Horn
of Africa.
Approximately 160 airlift sorties
were flown, 400 tons of cargo were delivered and approximately 3,400
passengers were transported. Airlift included approximately 44,000
pounds of troop re-supply air-dropped in Afghanistan.
Coalition C-130 crews from
Australia, Iraq and Japan flew in support of operations in Afghanistan
or Iraq.
On Aug. 27, Air Force and RAF
tankers flew 55 sorties and off-loaded approximately 3.1 million pounds
of fuel to 285 receiving aircraft.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Aug. 30 airpower summary: C-130's move
people, supplies
8/31/2007 - SOUTHWEST ASIA (AFPN) -- Coalition
airpower supported coalition ground forces in Iraq and the International
Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan during operations August 30,
according to Combined Air and Space Operations Center officials here.
In
Afghanistan, Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt IIs strafed enemy personnel with
cannon rounds. The attack was reported as successful.
Other A-10s conducted successful shows of force with flares to deter
enemy fire on ground units in Kabul.
A
Royal Air Force Harrier GR-7 destroyed an enemy compound with Enhanced
Paveway II munitions in Sangin. Afterward, the aircraft escorted the
convoy out of the area.
Also
in Sangin, Air Force F-15E Strike Eagles observed suspicious personnel
moving around a compound.
Another F-15E conducted a successful show of force with flares over an
enemy position in Tarin Kowt. Ground forces were taking small arms fire
from the location before the flyover. No attacks were reported after the
show of force.
In
total, 44 close-air-support missions were flown in support of the ISAF
and Afghan security forces, reconstruction activities and route patrols.
Eleven Air Force and RAF intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance
aircraft flew missions in support of operations in Afghanistan.
Additionally, two RAF aircraft performed tactical reconnaissance.
In
Iraq, Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcons dropped guided bomb unit-38s on
enemy buildings in Al Muqdadiyah. There were secondary explosions on
both buildings after the weapons impacted. The pilots also monitored a
funeral procession in the area.
U.S.
Navy F/A-18C Hornets dropped a GBU-51 and a GBU-38 on enemies in a bongo
truck in Baghdad. The truck was being used by improvised explosive
device emplacers. The joint terminal attack controller reported the
weapons had good effects.
Other F/A-18s provided successful shows of force over areas in Taji. The
JTAC reported the shows of force as successful.
An
F-16 showed force with flares over a suspicious vehicle in Tall Afar.
Other F-16s watched over raids and suspicious activities throughout the
area.
RAF
Tornado GR-4s and F-16s monitored activity in areas around Al
Iskandariyah.
An
F-16 provided a show of force over a coalition checkpoint in Balad after
it was attacked by insurgents. The show of force was reported as
successful. Also, the pilots monitored activity around an IED detonation
site.
In
Baqubah, another F-16 destroyed a house wired with explosives using a
GBU-38.
In
total, coalition aircraft flew 71 close-air-support missions for
Operation Iraqi Freedom. These missions supported coalition ground
forces, protected key infrastructure, provided over watch for
reconstruction activities and helped to deter and disrupt terrorist
activities.
Seventeen Air Force, Navy, RAF and Royal Australian Air Force ISR
aircraft flew missions in support of operations in Iraq. Additionally,
six Navy and RAF aircraft performed tactical reconnaissance.
Air
Force C-130 Hercules and C-17 Globemaster III's provided intratheater
heavy airlift support, helping to sustain operations throughout
Afghanistan, Iraq and the Horn of Africa.
Approximately 125 airlift sorties were flown; 475 tons of cargo was
delivered, and approximately 3,300 passengers were transported.
Coalition C-130 crews from Australia, Canada, Iraq and Japan flew in
support of operations in Afghanistan or Iraq.
On
August 29, Air Force and RAF aerial refueling crews flew 54 sorties and
off-loaded approximately 2.9 million pounds of fuel to 242 receiving
aircraft.
++++++++++++++++++++++++
Aug. 31
airpower summary: Tankers bring fuel to fight
9/1/2007 - SOUTHWEST ASIA (AFPN) -- Coalition
airpower supported coalition ground forces in Iraq and International
Security Assistance Force troops in Afghanistan during operations Aug.
31, according to Combined Air and Space Operations Center officials
here.
In Afghanistan, an Air Force B-1B
Lancer dropped multiple guided bomb unit-38s and 31s on enemies along a
ridgeline in Tarin Kowt.
Air Force F-15E Strike Eagles hit an
enemy exit route with GBU-38s near Orgun-E. The on-scene joint terminal
attack controller confirmed the bombs hit their targets. One of the
F-15Es provided a show of force with flares to deter any enemy activity
while helicopters were medically evacuating the wounded.
Other F-15Es dropped GBU-38s on an
improvised explosive device factory in Asmar. The JTAC confirmed the
hits were good.
In total, 38 close-air-support
missions were flown in support of ISAF and Afghan security forces,
reconstruction activities and route patrols.
Nine Air Force intelligence,
surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft flew missions in support of
operations in Afghanistan.
In Iraq, an Air Force F-16 Fighting
Falcon used a GBU-12 to destroy a weapons cache of artillery rounds in
Al Muqdadiyah. The fighter also searched for fake check points and
performed counter IED activities in the area.
In Baquba, Navy F/A-18 Super Hornets
conducted shows of force over an area suspected of enemy activity. The
jets also performed non-traditional intelligence, surveillance and
reconnaissance in the area. The Super Hornet recovered aboard the U.S.S.
Enterprise.
F-16s performed armed overwatch for
coalition forces in Baghdad.
In total, coalition aircraft flew 58
close-air-support missions for Operation Iraqi Freedom. These missions
supported coalition ground forces, protected key infrastructure,
provided overwatch for reconstruction activities and helped to deter and
disrupt terrorist activities.
Eighteen Air Force, Navy and Royal
Air Force ISR aircraft flew missions in support of operations in Iraq.
Additionally, five Navy and Air Force aircraft performed tactical
reconnaissance.
Air Force C-130 Hercules
aircraft and C-17 Globemaster IIIs provided intra-theater heavy airlift
support, helping to sustain operations throughout Afghanistan, Iraq and
the Horn of Africa.
Approximately 145 airlift sorties
were flown; 605 tons of cargo were delivered, and nearly 2,574
passengers were transported. This included approximately 46,890 pounds
of troop re-supply air-dropped in Afghanistan.
Coalition C-130 crews from
Australia, Iraq and Japan flew in support of operations in Afghanistan
or Iraq.
On Aug. 30, Air Force, RAF and
French tankers flew 55 sorties and off-loaded approximately 3.1 million
pounds of fuel to 270 receiving aircraft.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Sept. 1 airpower summary: Tankers keep
missions flying
9/2/2007 - SOUTHWEST ASIA (AFPN) -- Coalition
airpower supported coalition ground forces in Iraq and International
Security Assistance Force troops in Afghanistan during operations Sept.
1, according to Combined Air and Space Operations Center officials here.
In Afghanistan, Air Force A-10
Thunderbolt IIs destroyed insurgent locations with guided bomb unit-12s
and a general-purpose 500-pound bomb in Kandahar.
Also in Kandahar, an Air Force F-15E
Strike Eagle attacked insurgents in a building with a GBU-38. The
on-scene joint terminal attack controller confirmed the bomb hit the
target. F-15Es also watched caves for suspicious activity.
A Royal Air Force GR-7 Harrier
attacked an enemy mortar position using Enhanced Paveway II munitions in
Kandahar. The mortar fire ceased after the munitions hit their target. A
GR-9 performed a show of force over the location as well. The Harriers
also watched over friendly forces exiting an area in Sangin.
Also in Sangin, other F-15Es
attacked enemy firing positions with GBU-38s and cannon fire. The JTAC
confirmed the hits were good.
An A-10 dropped a GBU-12 on an enemy
mortar position in Asadabad. The JTAC confirmed a good hit. Another A-10
conducted a show of force with flares to keep enemies from attacking
coalition members in the area.
An F-15E provided a successful show
of force with flares to ward off enemy attacks near Kabul.
In total, 43 close-air-support
missions were flown in support of ISAF and Afghan security forces,
reconstruction activities and route patrols.
Eight Air Force intelligence,
surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft flew missions in support of
operations in Afghanistan. Additionally, two RAF aircraft performed
tactical reconnaissance.
In Iraq, Air Force F-16 Fighting
Falcons and A-10s conducted shows of force over a building housing
insurgents in Al Muqdadiyah.
Other F-16s provided overwatch for
ground forces and a convoy in areas around Salman Pak.
Another F-16 showed force over
Baqubah to keep enemies from returning to the scene of an earlier fire
fight.
In total, coalition aircraft flew 59
close-air-support missions for Operation Iraqi Freedom. These missions
supported coalition ground forces, protected key infrastructure,
provided overwatch for reconstruction activities and helped to deter and
disrupt terrorist activities.
Eighteen Air Force, Navy, RAF and
Royal Australian Air Force ISR aircraft flew missions in support of
operations in Iraq. Additionally, five Navy and Air Force aircraft
performed tactical reconnaissance.
Air Force C-130 Hercules
aircraft and C-17 Globemaster IIIs provided intra-theater heavy airlift
support, helping to sustain operations throughout Afghanistan, Iraq and
the Horn of Africa.
Approximately 155 airlift sorties
were flown; 415 tons of cargo were delivered, and nearly 3,950
passengers were transported. This included approximately 15,400 pounds
of troop re-supply air-dropped in Afghanistan.
Coalition C-130 crews from
Australia, Iraq and Korea flew in support of operations in Afghanistan
or Iraq.
On Aug. 31, Air Force, RAF and
French tankers flew 55 sorties and off-loaded approximately 2.9 million
pounds of fuel to 230 receiving aircraft.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Sept. 2 airpower summary: A-10s provide
show of force
9/3/2007 - SOUTHWEST ASIA (AFPN) -- Coalition
airpower supported coalition ground forces in Iraq and International
Security Assistance Force troops in Afghanistan during operations Sept.
2, according to Combined Air and Space Operations Center officials here.
In Afghanistan, Air Force A-10
Thunderbolt IIs attacked insurgent caves with guided bomb unit-12s in
Asadabad. The on-scene joint terminal attack controller confirmed the
bomb hit the target.
Also in Asadabad, an Air Force F-15E
Strike Eagle attacked insurgents in buildings with GBU-38s and GBU-12s.
The buildings were situated with a large compound. The F-15Es also hit
caves along a ravine with GBU-31s as well. The engagements were
considered successful.
An A-10 strafed enemies in Kandahar
with cannon rounds. The enemies were firing mortars at friendly forces
before the strafing pass. The JTAC confirmed good hits from the weapons.
Also in Kandahar, an Air Force B-1B
Lancer performed a show of force over a firefight between Taliban
soldiers and Afghan district police.
An A-10 provided a successful show
of force with flares to ward off enemy attacks in Tarin Kowt.
A Royal Air Force GR-9A Harrier
conducted a successful show of force over an area near Ghazni.
In total, 41 close-air-support
missions were flown in support of ISAF and Afghan security forces,
reconstruction activities and route patrols.
Ten Air Force and RAF intelligence,
surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft flew missions in support of
operations in Afghanistan. Additionally, two RAF aircraft performed
tactical reconnaissance.
In Iraq, Air Force F-16 Fighting
Falcons destroyed weapons caches using GBU-38s near Bayji. There were
secondary explosions when the weapon impacted the cache
Another F-16 showed force over Al
Kut to stop enemies from firing at a convoy that had stopped to fix a
flat tire. The small arms fire stopped after the show of force.
Another F-16 and an A-10 provided
shows of force with flares to disperse a large crowd in Baghdad. Both
flyovers were called successful by the JTAC.
An RAF GR-4 Tornado conducted a
successful show of force at Basrah Palace.
In total, coalition aircraft flew 69
close-air-support missions for Operation Iraqi Freedom. These missions
supported coalition ground forces, protected key infrastructure,
provided overwatch for reconstruction activities and helped to deter and
disrupt terrorist activities.
Sixteen Air Force, Navy, and Royal
Australian Air Force ISR aircraft flew missions in support of operations
in Iraq. Additionally, four Navy aircraft performed tactical
reconnaissance.
Air Force C-130 Hercules
aircraft and C-17 Globemaster IIIs provided intra-theater heavy airlift
support, helping to sustain operations throughout Afghanistan, Iraq and
the Horn of Africa.
Approximately 150 airlift sorties
were flown; 380 tons of cargo were delivered, and nearly 2,835
passengers were transported.
Coalition C-130 crews from Australia
and Canada flew in support of operations in Afghanistan or Iraq.
On Sept. 1, Air Force, RAF and
French tankers flew 50 sorties and off-loaded approximately 2.7 million
pounds of fuel to 240 receiving aircraft.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Flag Officer
Assignments
Chief of Naval
Operations Adm. Mike Mullen announced the following flag officer
assignments:
Rear Adm (lower
half) William E. Shannon III is being assigned as vice commander, Naval
Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, Md. Shannon is currently assigned
as assistant commander for logistics and industrial operations, Naval
Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, Md.
Rear Adm (lower
half) Michael D. Hardee, commander, Navy Fleet Readiness Centers, Naval
Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, Md., will assume the additional
duties of assistant commander for logistics and industrial operations,
Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, Md.
Rear
Admiral William E.
Shannon, III
United States Navy
Assistant Commander for Logistics and Industrial Operations
A
native of Massapequa, N.Y., Rear Admiral William E. Shannon graduated
from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1975 with a Bachelor of Science in
Business Administration and received a Master of Science in Systems
Management from the University of Southern California. He is a graduate
of the Armed Forces Staff College, the United States Marine Corps
Weapons and Tactics Instructor Course and the Defense Acquisition
University Advanced Program Manager Course. He was designated a Naval
Aviator in 1976.
At
sea, Rear Adm. Shannon flew the RH-53D Sea Stallion with HM-12 and HM-14
and he flew the MH-55E as a Department Head with HM-15. In addition, as
a Navy/Marine Corps Exchange Pilot, Rear Adm. Shannon flew the CH-53D
while serving as the S-3 and Weapons and Tactics Instructor with the
“Ugly Angels” of HMH-362. From 1993 to 1995 Rear Adm. Shannon served as
Executive Officer, and subsequently, Commanding Officer of the
“Blackhawks” of HM-15. During this tour, HM-15 deployed twice to Korea
in response to JCS tasking. While in command, HM-15 was awarded the
Chief of Naval Operations Safety Award and a Meritorious Unit
Commendation.
Ashore, Rear Adm. Shannon served as a flight instructor in HM-12, on
the Chief of Naval Operations Staff as Head of the Mine Warfare Branch,
and on the Commander, Mine Warfare Command Staff as Assistant Chief of
Staff for Readiness, Requirements and Tactics (N3/N8). His acquisition
tours include Deputy Program Executive Officer for Operations and
Airborne Mine Countermeasures (AMCM) in the Program Executive Office for
Air ASW, Assault and Special Mission Programs (PEO(A)), and Program
Manager of the Multi-Mission Helicopter Program Office (PMA 299), while
serving as Program Manager, PMA 299, he successfully introduced the
MH-60S Seahawk to the fleet. Rear Adm. Shannon was assigned as the
Deputy Program Executive Officer in PEO(A), prior to serving as the
Director, Naval Aviation Enterprise Total Force Readiness. He is
currently serving as the NAVAIR Assistant Commander for Logistics and
Industrial Operations.
His
personal decorations include the Legion of Merit (2), the Meritorious
Service Medal (3), the Navy Commendation Medal, and the Navy Achievement
Medal.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Rear
Admiral Michael D. Hardee
Commander, Fleet Readiness Centers, CNAF
Rear
Admiral Hardee assumed his duties as CNAF’s Commander of Fleet Readiness
Centers in October 2006. Prior to that, he served as NAVAIR’s Commander
of Aviation Depots in 2005.
Graduating from Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Va. with a Bachelor of
Science Degree in Biological Sciences, he received his commission from
Aviation Officer Candidate School in 1977 and after attending flight
training, was designated a Naval Flight Officer and received his wings
in 1978.
Rear Adm. Hardee acquired extensive operational and acquisition
experience through a wide variety of afloat and shore-based assignments.
He has completed ship’s company sea duty assignments onboard USS
Shreveport (LPD-12), earning his Surface Warfare Designation in
1982, USS Ranger (CV-61), USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63) and fleet
assignments at Naval Air Facility Atsugi, Naval Air Station North
Island, Naval Air Station Miramar, and Commander, Naval Air Forces
Pacific Staff.
Following graduation with a Masters Degree in the Material Logistics
curriculum from the Naval Postgraduate School in 1988, he was assigned
to Carrier Air Wing 2, where he served as Air Wing Aircraft Maintenance
Officer, completing two Western Pacific deployments aboard Ranger,
including a combat cruise during Operation Desert Storm.
Upon completion of the Program Management Course at Defense Systems
Management College, Fort Belvoir, Va., Rear Adm. Hardee was assigned to
Naval Air Systems Command. He assumed his duties in Aviation Support
Equipment, PMA-260 in 1992, where he served as the Assistant Program
Manager for Systems Engineering for Consolidated Automated Support
Systems Automated Test Equipment (USM-636 CASS). During this tour, he
successfully completed PMA-260’s (Aviation Support Equipment)
Operational Evaluation (OPEVAL) in preparation for initial production of
CASS.
In 1995, he was assigned to Commander, Naval Air Forces, Pacific Fleet
staff as the Aircraft Maintenance Plans and Policy Officer, implementing
over 100 changes to the OPNAVINST. 4790, the Naval Aviation Maintenance
Program and continued research in Human Factors in aircraft maintenance
with the Naval Postgraduate School.
Assigned again to PMA 260 in 1999 as principal deputy program manager
for Aviation Support Equipment program office, he became a certified
Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM II) practitioner, responsible for
the physical asset management of the Navy’s common use Aviation Support
Equipment. Rear Adm. Hardee and his RCM team won the Department of
Defense Value Engineering Award in 2001 for their accomplishments in RCM.
Assuming command of DCMA Sikorsky Aircraft in November 2001, he was
responsible for the contract management of and delivery of rotorcraft
and rotorcraft products from five major programs to U.S. military
departments and allied nations. During his tenure, DCMA’s flight
activity won the agency’s Major Flight Operations Safety Award for 2002.
Assigned duties as the NAVAIR’s Enterprise AIRSpeed Project Officer and
Chief of NAVRIIP Staff in 2003, he was responsible for the planning,
introduction and implementation of Lean, Six Sigma and Theory of
Constraints in Fleet aviation intermediate maintenance activities.
Rear Adm. Hardee’s personal decorations include the Defense Superior
Service Medal, Legion of Merit, four Meritorious Service Medals, four
Navy Commendation Medals and an Army Commendation Medal.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From NAVAIR PAO -
Subject: NAWCWD to
hold change of command
Date: 29-Aug-07
News Release Number: ECL200708291
News Release Copy: Rear Adm. David Dunaway will replace Rear Adm. Mark
Skinner as commander of the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division
during a change of command ceremony on Sept. 18.
The ceremony will be held at 9 a.m.
on the front lawn of the Administration Building at the Naval Air
Weapons Station China Lake. NAVAIR Commander and former NAWCWD Commander
Vice Adm. David Venlet will be the keynote speaker. A reception will
follow at the Paradise Cafe (formerly the Wreck Center). All military
personnel, Department of Defense civilian employees and contractors are
invited to attend.
Skinner will return to Patuxent
River to head the Program Executive Office for Tactical Aircraft
Programs. Dunaway comes to China Lake from his most recent assignment as
deputy program executive officer for Air ASW, Assault and Special
Mission Programs at Patuxent River.
Dunaway, born in El Paso, Texas,
received his wings in April 1984 and subsequently served as a
Selectively Retained Graduate flight instructor in Meridian, Miss. After
completing F/A-18 initial training, he served in VFA-151 aboard the USS
Midway in Yokosuka, Japan from 1986-1989, when he was selected for the
U.S. Naval Test Pilot School at Patuxent River. Dunaway’s test
assignments include A-12 operational test director for VX-5, F/A-18
branch head and operational test director for the Airborne Self
Protection Jammer, and deputy for Test and Evaluation for the F/A-18
Weapon System Support Activity. He also served as the F/A-18E/F
operational test director at VX-9. In this position, Dunaway flew more
than 200 developmental test missions and was selected as the Test Pilot
of the Year.
His program management assignments
include PMA-265 as the F/A-18 Radar IPT lead for the APG-79 Active
Electronically Scanned Array radar, and PMA-201 as the program manager
for the Precision Strike Weapons program office.
Dunaway holds a bachelor’s degree in
Mechanical Engineering from the U.S. Naval Academy, a master’s in
Aviation Systems Management from the University of Tennessee and a
master’s in Aerospace Engineering from the Naval Postgraduate School.
His personal decorations include the Legion of Merit, Meritorious
Service Medal, Navy Commendation Medal and the Navy Achievement Medal.
He has accrued more than 2,900 flight hours and 290 arrested carrier
landings.
Rear
Admiral W. Mark Skinner
Commander
Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division
China Lake and Point Mugu, Calif.
Rear
Admiral Mark Skinner is a native of Houston, Texas, and graduated from
the United States Naval Academy in June 1977. He completed flight
training and was designated a Naval Aviator in 1979. He reported first
to Patrol Squadron 23. He then served as an FRS Instructor Pilot aboard
Patrol Squadron Thirty-one until 1984.
After graduating from Test Pilot School in 1985, he reported to Force
Warfare Aircraft Test Directorate where he was recognized as Directorate
Test Pilot of the Year in 1986. He served as the Communications Officer
in USS Ranger and then went to Patrol Squadron Six as the Safety/NATOPS
Officer, then Maintenance Officer. In 1991, Rear Adm Skinner joined the
staff of Patrol Wing Two, serving as Current Operations Officer. He
served as Executive Officer for Patrol Squadron Forty-seven and
subsequently took command in 1994. He then reported to Combined Task
Force 72/57 as Operations Officer, directing VP forces participating in
Operations Vigilant Sentinel and Southern Watch, and PRC-Taiwan
Contingency Operations.
After graduating from Naval Postgraduate School as a Conrad Scholar, he
was awarded the Department of the Navy award for excellence in financial
management, and the Rear Admiral Thomas R. McClellan award for
excellence in administrative sciences. After completing the Defense
Systems Management College Program Manager Course, he joined Naval Force
Aircraft Test Squadron as Chief Test Pilot in 1996.
As Commanding Officer of Naval Force Aircraft Test Squadron, Patuxent
River, Md, in 1998, he was later selected as Program Manager for a Chief
of Naval Operations Special Project. He served as the Acting Deputy
Program Executive Officer for Air ASW, Assault and Special Mission
Programs until February 2002.
Rear Adm. Skinner assumed command of NAVAIR Weapons Division in August
2004 with responsibility for Navy weapons and systems RDT&E and fleet
support capabilities at China Lake and Point Mugu, Calif. His awards
include the Legion of Merit, Meritorious Service Medal (4 awards), Navy
Commendation Medal (2 awards), Navy Achievement Medal, and other unit
deployment citations and ribbons.
Rear
Admiral (Select) David A. Dunaway
Deputy Program Executive Officer
Air ASW, Assault and Special Mission Programs
Rear
Admiral (Select) David Dunaway was born in El Paso, Texas. He received
his wings in April, 1984 and subsequently served as a Selectively
Retained Graduate flight instructor in Meridian, Miss. After completing
FA-18 initial training, he served in VFA-151, aboard the USS Midway
in Yokosuka, Japan from 1986-1989, when he was selected for the U.S.
Naval Test Pilot School Class 96, Patuxent River, Md.
Rear Adm. (Sel) Dunaway’s test assignments include: VX-5 as the A-12
operational test director; F/A-18 branch head and operational test
director for the Airborne Self Protection Jammer (ASPJ) (during this
tour, he was selected as an Aerospace Engineering Duty Officer); F/A-18
Weapon System Support Activity as the deputy for Test and Evaluation
working on F/A-18 OFP’s 09C, 11C, 13C, 10A and 12A, as well as a quick
reaction installation of ASPJ in Marine aircraft deployed in Bosnia;
and, VX-9 as the F/A-18E/F operational test director where he conducted
OT-IIA, OT-IIB and OPEVAL for the Super Hornet. In this position, Rear
Adm. (Sel) Dunaway flew more than 200 developmental test missions and
was selected as the Test Pilot of the Year.
His program management assignments include: PMA-265 as the F/A-18 Radar
IPT lead for the APG-79 Active Electronically Scanned Array radar, for
which he and his team received the 2003 Aviation Week and Space
Technology Laureate Award in developing this state-of-the art radar; and
PMA-201 as the program manager for the Precision Strike Weapons program
office. During his tour, the program office fielded many critical
warfighting weapons to include JSOW C, GBU-38, Dual Mode LGB’s and
SLAM-ER anti-ship capability. Of special note, the JSOW program received
the David Packard Award for innovative business practices.
Rear Adm. (Sel) Dunaway is currently the Deputy Program Executive
Officer, Air Anti-Submarine Warfare, Assault and Special Mission
Programs.
Rear Adm. (Sel) Dunaway holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering from the
U.S. Naval Academy, an MS in Aviation Systems Management from the
University of Tennessee and an MS in Aerospace Engineering from the
Naval Postgraduate School. His personal decorations include the Legion
of Merit, Meritorious Service Medal, Navy Commendation Medal and the
Navy Achievement Medal. He has accrued more than 2,900 flight hours and
290 arrested carrier landings.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Press Release
Number: EHD200708231
23-Aug-07
Airwake Analysis
Keeps Navy Ships Safe for Aviation
By Vicky Falcón
NAVAIR Public Affairs Office
Aircraft pilots have the third most dangerous job in the world (behind
fishermen and loggers), according to a Bureau of Labor statistics report
for 2005. Naval pilots who must land their aircraft aboard a moving ship
have additional risks associated with their work.
Susan Polsky and the Airwake Analysis team at Naval Air Station Patuxent
River, Md., are working to reduce those risks, making at-sea landings of
H-60s, F/A-18s – and other Navy aircraft – safer. Polsky is an aerospace
engineer with the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) and leads the team
as they work with the Naval Sea Systems Command to ensure future Navy
ships are safe for aviation operations.
The Airwake Analysis team uses a combination of simulators, wind tunnels
and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD – their computer analysis tool) to
determine air flow behind and around a ship. That airflow, called a
“burble” by fixed-wing pilots, varies in speed and turbulence levels.
“Airwake, or burble, is unavoidable,” explained Polsky. “We are
participating in future ship design programs to potentially lessen that
burble since increased turbulence would mean more of a workload, and an
increased risk, for the pilot.”
Sid Hatcher is a retired Navy H-60 pilot with 700 small-deck landings
and lots of experience with airwakes. He presently works as a test pilot
for the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division’s HX21, the rotary
wing test squadron at NAS Patuxent River.
Recently he has been testing simulations using CFD airwake data in
support of the H-60 Program Office (PMA-299) and the Naval Aviation
Training Systems Program Office (PMA-205).
“Airwake is an important factor in getting an aircraft aboard (a ship)
safely,” said Hatcher. “There are controllability challenges in
maintaining a precise position, as well as performance issues for an
aircraft transitioning in and out of the relative winds.”
Previously, the operational capability of an aircraft landing on a ship
was not known until the aircraft landed on the ship for the first time.
Now, ship designers are able to assess potential geometries on the
drawing board for adverse ship airwake effects before metal is even cut.
One of the ships the team is presently working on is the next class of
carrier (the 21 Class) – specifically, USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78).
“The new carrier has a different superstructure and it’s in a different
place than on existing carriers,” said Polsky. The superstructure houses
the command and control functions for the carrier and the entire battle
group.
By using computer modeling, the team can determine where and how the
airwake will flow behind the new ship. Since fixed-wing aircraft
approach for landing from behind a carrier, this is vital information
for pilots.
The team has developed a ship simulation which allows a pilot to “fly”
through new airwake data, obtaining aircraft control surface activity
and other data that help determine how much the airwake will affect the
pilot and the aircraft.
“That data is key to determining any deviations from the old to the new
configurations,” explained Polsky.
With that information, the team can develop a training simulator for
pilot orientations in preparation for landing on board CVN-78 and other
ships, or to test new aircraft such as the V-22 Osprey.
LtCol Bill Witzig is a US Marine Corps pilot with the V-22 program who
has also flown a simulator using the CFD airwake analysis.
“The value of this effort has enormous potential to improve the quality
of pilot training,” said Witzig. “The control inputs needed close to the
flight deck were very representative of those needed on actual flight
decks.”
According to Witzig, the Marine Corps’ V-22 training and readiness
manual directs 51% of the total pilot training requirement be conducted
in simulators. “It goes without saying that flight simulation devices,
in this type of a training program, need to be as realistic as
possible.”
Hatcher agrees. “Especially when coupled with a full motion simulator,
the aircraft response and flight control activity is as close to the
real thing as I’ve seen,” he said. “Of course there is nothing better
than using real ships, real aircraft and the real environment. But
sometimes all three are not available. This is especially true when
looking to evaluate shipboard landings in high winds and sea states. We
are discovering CFD airwake modeling is an excellent and recommended
tool for training pilots in shipboard landing as well as for buildup
prior to Dyanamic Interface (shipboard) testing.”
The Airwake Analysis team also worked with USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72)
immediately following the Indian Ocean earthquake/tsunami in December
2005. The carrier was using helicopters for humanitarian airlifts, but
still needed to continue F/A-18 flight operations.
Polsky and her team analyzed the level of jet wash (air expelled from a
jet engine) during a catapult launch and determined that the helicopters
could safely land and take off using a platform on the other side of the
super structure. Their work will impact most of the other Navy carriers
as ship deck markings are changed and as the temporary Interim Flight
Clearance becomes permanent, expanding operational envelopes beyond
their previous capacity.
The team has also performed a general airflow evaluation on the latest
destroyer design – the DDG 1000. They used the H-60 helicopter as their
model for the evaluation of the Zumwalt Class Destroyer. The results of
the team’s analysis and testing are being utilized by the program office
in the design efforts for DDG 1000. The team's efforts have provided
confidence to the DDG 1000 team that the unique deckhouse design does
not adversely effect helicopter operations on the flight deck as the
analyzed air flow is shown to be within acceptable operation limits for
the H-60.
“Our job was to look at the operational envelope for the H-60 on the new
ship and determine if it’s acceptable or unacceptable relative to
current destroyers,” explained Polsky. “We used CFD to predict the
airflow around the ship and the results were provided to the program
office to help identify any risk to aviation associated with the
unconventional topside design.”
“By getting it right the first time, the need for expensive
modifications to the ship geometry are averted,” said Polsky, “and the
Fleet is provided with the ship-aircraft system that gets the job done
in as wide a range of environmental conditions as possible.”
Although influencing ship design in the earliest stages allows Polsky
and her team to help enlarge the operational envelope of Navy ships,
they are especially pleased to be increasing the safety of the pilots
who land their aircraft aboard those ships.
“I’m thrilled that we’ve been able to positively impact the Fleet by
reducing the risk of operating aircraft – both fixed and rotary wing,”
said Polsky.
Caption 1: This animated view of a fixed wing aircraft making an at-sea
landing on board a carrier illustrates the airwake around both aircraft
and ship. The data, produced through the Airwake Analysis team at
Patuxent River, Md., is being used in the design of new Navy ships and
to develop more realistic training simulators for pilots.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Inside The Pentagon
August 30, 2007
Pg. 1
Mullen Aims To
Re-Energize U.S.-Russian Ties With Rare Meeting
Adm. Michael Mullen hopes his
meeting last week with Russia’s naval chief will help re-energize
U.S.-Russian military ties, Mullen’s spokesman tells Inside the
Pentagon.
It was the first formal meeting in
over a decade between a U.S. chief of naval operations and the head of
Russia’s navy. Mullen, who will become chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff in October, met with Adm. Vladimir Masorin on Friday (Aug. 24) at
the Pentagon.
Mullen and Masorin had met
informally before, most recently in October 2006 at the Regional
Seapower Symposium in Venice, Italy.
However, Friday’s meeting was the
first formal counterpart exchange between the two navies since the late
Adm. Jeremy Boorda visited Russia in April 1996, and the first
counterpart visit of a Russian navy chief to the United States since
1995, said Mullen’s spokesman, Capt. John Kirby.
“We hope the success of this visit
will re-energize a regular cycle of counterpart exchanges between us,”
Kirby said.
The meeting had been in the works
since last October, he said.
Kirby said Mullen was “delighted” to
host Masorin during his visit to Washington and was “grateful for the
chance to discuss issues of mutual concern” with Masorin and members of
his delegation, including opportunities to strengthen navy-to-navy
relations and to deepen the level of cooperation.
The “cordial and candid” talks
“contributed to a greater sense of understanding between the two leaders
and our two navies,” Kirby said.
He said the talks covered many broad
topics, including the common challenges of modernizing fleets, the U.S.
Navy’s effort to develop a new maritime strategy, the “1,000-ship navy”
and other opportunities for closer coordination.
No major decisions were sought or
made at the meeting, Kirby said.
Masorin recently made headlines by
saying Russia should restore a permanent naval presence in the
Mediterranean Sea. Media reports say Russia might resume basing ships at
the Syrian port of Tartus if Ukraine does not renew Russia’s lease for
the port of Sevastopol, which expires in 2017.
Masorin also has reportedly said his
navy plans to acquire six new aircraft carriers in the coming years.
The Russian admiral’s trip to the
United States last week also included stops at Arlington National
Cemetery and the Office of Naval Intelligence.
In addition, in Norfolk, VA, Masorin
visited the Navy’s Fleet Forces Command and three vessels: the
amphibious warship Bataan (LHD-5), the destroyer Mahan (DDG-72) and the
submarine Norfolk (SSN-714).
In Newport, RI, he visited the Naval
War College and the Senior Enlisted Academy.
Officials from the Naval War College
briefed Masorin and his delegation in Newport on the development of the
U.S. Navy’s maritime strategy, Kirby said.
Vice Adm. John Morgan, who has
overseen the strategy effort, invited the Russians to review the
strategy and invited them to send a representative to participate in the
college’s International Seapower Symposium in October, Kirby said.
Last June, just as U.S. Navy
officials were holding a maritime strategy conference at the college,
Russian officials were holding their own conference in Moscow on
Russia’s new maritime strategy.
According to Russia’s Itar-Tass news
service, the Moscow event focused on enhancing the effectiveness of all
kinds of Russian maritime activities, the development of the Russian
fleet’s infrastructure in regions, securing Russia’s national interests
and the integration of maritime policy in the main guidelines of
Russia’s foreign and internal policies.
-- Christopher J. Castelli
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Stennis
Returns Home From Deployment
Story Number: NNS070831-13
Release Date: 8/31/2007 1:28:00 PM
By Mass Communication Specialist 2nd
Class (SW/AW) Joseph R. Vincent, USS John C. Stennis Public Affairs
BREMERTON, Wash. (NNS) -- USS John
C. Stennis (CVN 74) returned to its homeport of Bremerton, Aug. 31,
after a successful seven and a half month deployment.
While deployed, Stennis supported Operations Enduring Freedom (OEF) and
Iraqi Freedom (OIF), maritime operations, coalition operations in the
U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations (AOO), Expeditionary Strike Force (ESF)
training and recently, Exercise Valiant Shield 2007.
“The very presence of a nuclear aircraft carrier and the strike group
that surrounds it, helped provide stability and security throughout the
Middle East and Pacific regions,” said Commander, Carrier Strike Group
3, Rear Adm. Kevin M. Quinn. “It helped to dissuade and deter potential
adversaries, and at the same time, helped to assure friendly countries
in that region that we have the commitment and capability to maintain
stability and security throughout the maritime environment; Stennis was
the focal point of that.”
Stennis’ Commanding Officer, Capt. Brad Johanson expressed his pride in
the ship’s impact on the mission while serving as the centerpiece of the
John C. Stennis Carrier Strike Group (JCSSG).
“We are proud of what we accomplished,” said Stennis’ Commanding
Officer, Capt. Brad Johanson. “The people I have the privilege to lead
continually amaze me in their abilities and desires. I can honestly say
I’m not too concerned about our future generations when we have great
folks like these.”
While supporting OEF and OIF from the North Arabian Sea, Stennis and
embarked Carrier Air Wing 9 flew approximately 8,000 sorties providing
more than 22,000 flight hours, dropped more than 160 bombs and expended
more than 11,000 rounds of ammunition during 82 strafing attacks.
"Throughout this deployment, Stennis has set a new standard for the
performance of carriers in a combat zone,” said Johanson. “The missions
we sent into Afghanistan and Iraq and the strong presence we established
in the [Persian] Gulf, made a very significant difference in providing
security and stability to the entire region."
Along with five months of combat operations in support of OEF and OIF,
Stennis also participated in a number of exercises during its
deployment, such as a unique humanitarian relief exercise in the Persian
Gulf, dual-carrier exercises with USS Eisenhower (CVN 69) and ESF
training in the 5th Fleet AOO with USS Nimitz (CVN 68) and USS Bonhomme
Richard (LHD 6), while simultaneously providing close-air support to
coalition ground forces.
“We got feedback from troops in combat, and we know that the operations
we conducted on board John C. Stennis saved the lives of the troops on
the ground,” said Quinn. “Across the board, in every area, the
performance of Stennis was magnificent.”
After successfully completing operations in the U.S. 5th Fleet AOO July
11, Stennis sailed to the U.S. 7th Fleet area of responsibility (AOR)
where Sailors and Marines enjoyed port visits in Singapore and Hong Kong
and participated in more than 20 community relations projects.
“The crew performed superbly throughout the port visits,” said Stennis
Command Master Chief (AW/SW) Joseph Curtin. “Everyone did well;
everybody had a good time and enjoyed themselves. They had a chance to
rest and relax and learn about local culture.”
Following the visit to Hong Kong, Stennis participated in Exercise
Valiant Shield 2007 off the coast of Guam from Aug. 7-14. The joint
military exercise brought together more than 30 ships including the
Kitty Hawk and Nimitz Carrier Strike Groups, 280 aircraft and more than
20,000 service members from the Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps and Coast
Guard. Valiant Shield tested the military’s ability to rapidly bring
together joint forces in response to any regional contingency,
demonstrating the United States’ commitment to ensuring peace and
stability throughout the Asian-Pacific region.
With the conclusion of Valiant Shield, Stennis wrapped up the
operational requirement of her 2007 deployment and sailed toward home.
“When I look back on this great adventure of ours, the thing I’m most
proud of is the performance of our young Sailors and Marines,” said
Quinn. “They’ve left the comforts of their homes; they’ve left their
families; they’ve gone forward into the combat zone to fight for our
country, and their performance in that combat zone has been
outstanding.”
Stennis will soon commence its post-overseas movement standdown to give
the crew some well-deserved time off before the ship begins its docked
planned incremental availability later this year where it will undergo
about six months of maintenance and upgrades. |
|