|
CONTENTS:
Membership
Donation Form
Photo
Gallery
Air
Stations
Reunions
Special
Articles
Other
Sites
Contact Us
|
BULLHORN #21 22APR08
99 ANAers!!
Please pass to
ALL HANDS –
PBS documentary CARRIER. A 10-hour series
airing on PBS Sunday 27 April, that follows the crew and airwing of
the USS NIMITZ (CVN 68) through a WESTPAC in 2005. This series is a
must see for anyone who really wants to see and experience life
onboard a nuclear powered US aircraft carrier, most powerful weapon
in our arsenal. This show is a reality show following the crew and
their daily lives. No punches are held; it shows the positive and
the negative of life at sea.
Remember, the Naval Aviation Museum Foundation
will conduct Symposium ’08 Wednesday 7 May (golf tournament) thru
Friday, 9 May.
ANA will have its annual membership
meeting at 1300 on Friday in the Museum auditorium.
What a great opportunity to see THE Museum,
enjoy a wonderful symposium program and our membership meeting! We
hope to see you there.
Details of Symposium ’08 can be found at
http://www.navalaviationmuseum.org/getdoc/a5322efa-2eb2-4fe7-ac79-3379c049be2d/Symposium.aspx
PLEASE SEE LOTS
MORE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND NEWS IN THE ATTACHMENT
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

A
product of... Navy Office of
Information
www.chinfo.navy.mil
www.navy.mil 703.697.5342
April 15, 2008
|
Maritime
Strategy: Enabling Commerce |
|
“Our
responsibility to the tax payers of this great nation is to
provide maritime security on the approaches to this country, the
strategic lines of communication on the maritime domain, and in
strategic straits and there are many of those, frankly, in this
region.”
-- Adm.
Robert F. Willard, Commander, Pacific Fleet
The
maritime domain carries the lifeblood of the global system
70% of the
world is water, 80% of the world lives on or near the coastline
and 90% of the world’s trade sails across it. Any disruption to
the global system has a direct impact on the American way of
life.
• Protection of the world's
sea lanes is paramount in an era when foreign political crises,
terrorists, smugglers and pirates may pose a more imminent
threat to the flow of seaborne trade than traditional warfare.
• As examples of the global
challenge, CNE-C6F’s top threats to the maritime economic system
include unregulated or illegal fishing ($1 billion/year in
sub-Saharan Africa [Department For International Development -
UK]), illegal oil bunkering in the Niger Delta ($3 million/day
[Human Rights Watch, BBC, Shell, others]), trafficking in
humans, weapons, drugs and wildlife ($32 billion/year industry
in humans [Int’l Labor Org]) and piracy (120 actual or attempted
attacks in Africa for 2007 [IMB]).
Solving
the global challenge of Maritime Domain Awareness
• Naval Cooperation and
Guidance for Shipping (NCAGS) is a technology and training
initiative to aid commanders by providing near real-time
situational awareness on commercial shipping to help ensure safe
passage for merchant and naval vessels.
• As Navy assets depend on
connectivity for sharing information, NETWARCOM’s tailored
Maritime Operations Center (MOC) enables 24/7/365 communications
around the world, ashore and at sea. An integral part of the MOC
is the Navy Cyber Defense Operations Command, which monitors
Navy networks to thwart intrusions and exploitation, and ensures
free flow of information in the maritime environment.
• Through cooperative
hydrographic surveys, Naval Oceanography’s Fleet Survey Team (FST)
provides safety of navigation information for Navy ships,
commercial shipping and other maritime vessels. FST recently
completed surveys in West Africa as part of Africa Partnership
Station, raising awareness of the need for updated charts and
exposing participating nations to tools and techniques required
to meet today’s standards.
Enabling the free flow of legitimate commerce through Maritime
Security Operations (MSO)
Forward
deployed maritime forces provide security to enhance the U.S.
and global economies.
• USS Hawaii, the nation’s
newest Virginia-class submarine, is underway in the SOUTHCOM
area of responsibility conducting counter-illicit trafficking
operations.
• For sixty years, 5th
Fleet operations have reassured regional partners
of the Coalition’s commitment to security. Combined Maritime
Forces comprises three task forces and about 20 nations working
together to deny the use of the sea for terror from the Strait
of Hormuz, to the Suez Canal; from Pakistan to Kenya.
|
|
Key
Messages |
Facts &
Figures |
|
•
World prosperity and security
depend on free use of the seas. Markets crave security, and our
vital interests are best served by a peaceful global system.
• Our forces build trust and
confidence through collective efforts with international
partners in support of our mutual interests.
• The global economy requires
free flow of commerce.
|
•
The Los Angeles Customs
district (including area ports and airport) is the nation’s
largest based on two-way trade, totaling $293.9 billion in 2005.
• 51% of the world’s fish
comes from developing countries.
• The global drug trade is
$300 billion/year [UN].
• Get
recent leadership messages on maritime security by podcast
and Daily News Updates here and here.
|
MEMBERSHIP FEEDBACK
Membership Services On-Line - ? We have
received some feedback indicating some members would like to be able
to renew their memberships on-line, doing both the “paperwork” and
payment using an interactive web-based program that accepts credit
cards. So far, the numbers expressing interest in this capability
are not enough to justify the expense of developing it. If more
members would like us to invest in this capability, please let me
know by email to me at svwindmills@erols.com.
Self-addressed return envelopes
for renewals - We have received a number of requests for us to
enclose a self-addressed return envelope in membership renewal
notices. This is an action item being addressed at our next
executive meeting; expect a decision soon.
LOST AND FOUND
We have lost contact with the following members. Every member is
important!! If anyone has information regarding their situation or
whereabouts, please contact me at svwindmills@erols.com
|
Name |
Full Name |
Last Known
Address |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Atwood |
Mr. Wallace
Atwood |
Wittmann, AZ |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Baxter |
LT William M.
Baxter, USN |
Honolulu, HI |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Brooks |
Mrs. Charles L.
Brooks |
New Orleans, LA |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Burns |
CAPT Richard H.
Burns, USN (Ret) |
San Diego, CA |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Burns |
CAPT David M.
Burns, USN (Ret) |
Camden, ME |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Burns |
Capt John A.
Burns, USN (Ret) |
Warren, ME |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Convery |
LT James J.
Convery, III USN |
VF-151 |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Conway |
CDR Michael Ray
Conway, USN |
San Diego |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Dundas |
CDR Geoffrey W.
Dundas, USN |
Kaneohe, HI |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Heron |
CDR
Paul J. Heron, USN (Ret) |
Camarillo, CA |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Hyland |
LCDR
Joel Hyland, USN (Ret) |
Port Orange, FL |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Kellett |
CDR John Kellett,
USN (Ret) |
Kaneohe Bay, HI |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Lanham |
Dr John Lanham |
Muskego, WI |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Lasker |
CDR
Lawrence J. Lasker, USN(Ret) |
Hawaii |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Lutche |
CDR Michael W.
Lutche, USN |
Kailua, HI |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Lynham |
CDR
Donald M. Lynham, USN (Ret) |
Indiana |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
McDaniel |
CDR Ronald A.
McDaniel, USN |
HC-4, FPO
|
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Miller |
Mr. Marvin Miller |
Tampa, FL |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Moreschi |
LTJG John R.
Moreschi, Jr, USN |
Jacksonville, FL |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Niedermair |
LCDR Joseph
Niedermair, USN |
New Orleans, LA |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Peterson |
Mr. Bruce
Peterson |
Zephyrhills, FL |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Phelps |
Mr. Christopher
Phelps |
Kapolei, HI |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Porter |
COL Robert B.
Porter, USMC (Ret) |
Fresno, CA |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Remington |
LCDR Paul
Remington, USN (Ret) |
Smyrna, GA |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Shurtleff |
CAPT W. H.
Shurtleff, USN (Ret) |
Ewa Beach, HI |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Sorensen |
Ms Mary Sorensen |
Tucson, AZ |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Tower |
LCDR Maury Tower
, USN (Ret) |
Virginia Beach,
VA |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Weisheit |
MAJ Bowen P.
Weisheit, USMC (Ret) |
Bel Air, MD |
|
4/8/2008 |
|
Wilson |
Mr. Michael P.
Wilson |
Honolulu, HI |
|
4/8/2008 |
Col Jerry J. Mitchell,
USMC (RET) of the USS MIDWAY Museum is looking for the following
officers who served on USS Oriskany in Viet Nam in 1965: CDR John W.
Johnson, Air Boss.
From VAH-4
Det Golf: LTJG Signorelli, I. A., LCDRTanner, J. t., LCDR Damen,
T. A., LCDR Burkel, J. F., LTJG Norfleet, R. N. LTJG Borland, J.
B., LT Bingham, T. F.
Please contact COL
Mitchell via email at jmitch2895@san.rr.com or by phone at 619 429
0174.
Status of the Navy
April 22, 2008
Navy Personnel
Active Duty:
331,924

Officers: 51,081

Enlisted: 276,500

Midshipmen: 4,343
Ready Reserve: 126,060 [As of 08 Mar]

Selected Reserves: 70,249

Individual Ready Reserve: 55,811
Reserves currently mobilized: 5,385 [As of 16 Apr]
Personnel on deployment: 69,490
Navy Department Civilian Employees:
178,688

Ships and Submarines
Deployable Battle Force Ships:
279

Ships Underway (away from homeport):
131 ships (47% of
total)

On deployment:
115 ships (41% of total)

Attack submarines underway (away from homeport):
25 submarines (46%)

On deployment:
20 submarines (37%)
Ships Underway

Carriers:
USS
Kitty Hawk (CV 63) - Pacific Ocean
USS
Nimitz (CVN 68) - Philippine Sea
USS
Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) - 5th Fleet
USS
George Washington (CVN 73) - Atlantic Ocean
USS
Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) - 5th Fleet
USS
Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) - Pacific Ocean

Amphibious Warfare Ships:
USS
Nassau (LHA 4) - Mediterranean Sea

Tarawa
Expeditionary Strike Group:
USS
Tarawa (LHA 1) - 5th Fleet
Aircraft (operational): 3700+
April 22, 2008
Flag Officer
Announcements
Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates announced today that the
President has made the following
nominations:
Navy Vice Adm. Melvin G. Williams Jr. has been nominated for
reappointment to the grade of vice admiral
and assignment as commander, Second Fleet, Norfolk,
Va. Williams is currently serving as deputy commander,
U.S. Fleet Forces Command, Norfolk, Va.
(VADM Williams is a surface warfare
officer – Dutch)
Navy Rear Adm. William E. Gortney has been nominated for appointment to
the grade of vice admiral and
assignment as commander, U.S. Naval Forces, Central
Command and commander, Fifth Fleet, in Bahrain. Gortney
is currently serving as commander, Carrier Strike Group
Ten, Norfolk, Va.
Rear Admiral William E. Gortney
Commander, Carrier Strike Group Ten
Rear
Admiral William E. Gortney graduated from Elon College, North
Carolina in 1977, earning a Bachelor of Arts in History and
Political Science. He entered the Navy as an Aviation Officer
Candidate (AOC), and received his commission as an Ensign in the
United States Naval Reserve in September 1977. Rear Adm. Gortney
received his Wings of Gold in December 1978 while assigned to VT-7
in Meridian, Mississippi.
Rear Adm. Gortney’s command assignments include VFA-15, 1994-1995,
onboard USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71), VFA-106, the East
Coast F/A-18 Fleet Replacement Squadron, 1996-1997, and Carrier Air
Wing Seven, 2002-2003, onboard USS John F. Kennedy (CV-67).
Rear Adm. Gortney’s fleet assignments include tours with VA-82,
1981-1984, onboard USS Nimitz (CVN 68); VFA-87, 1988-1990,
onboard USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71); Executive Officer,
VFA-132, 1991-1992, onboard USS Forrestal (CV 59); Executive
Officer, VFA-15, 1992-1994, onboard USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN
71); and Deputy Commander, Carrier Air Wing Seven, 2000-2002,
onboard USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69), and USS John F.
Kennedy (CV 67).
Rear Adm. Gortney’s shore assignments include tours with VT-26
(T-2C) NAS Beeville Texas, 1978-1980; VFA-125 (F/A-18A/B), NAS
Lemoore, California, 1984-1988; and Aide and Flag Lieutenant to the
Assistant Chief of Naval Operations (Air Warfare), in Washington,
D.C., 1990-1991. Additional training tours include VT-6 (T-28), VT-9
(T-2C), VA-174 (A-7E), VFA-125 and VFA-106 (F/A-18A/B/C/D). He is a
1996 graduate of the Naval War College, earning a Masters of Arts in
International Security Affairs. He served on the Joint Staff, J-33
Joint Operations Department, CENTCOM Division, 1998-1999, followed
by a tour as Deputy for Current Operations, Joint Task Force
Southwest Asia. Rear Adm. Gortney served as Chief, Naval and
Amphibious Liaison Element to the Combined Forces Air Component
Commander, U.S. Central Command, for Operation Iraqi Freedom.
He served as the Chief of Staff for Commander, U.S. Naval Forces
Central Command / U.S. Fifth Fleet from 2003-2004. He served as the
Deputy Chief of Staff for Global Force Management and Joint
Operations, Fleet Forces Command, in Norfolk, VA 2004-2006. Rear
Adm. Gortney reported to his current position as Commander, Carrier
Strike Group Ten in July 2006.
Rear Adm. Gortney has flown over 5300 flight hours and made over
1,200 carrier arrested landings. He is authorized to wear the
Defense Superior Service Medal, Legion of Merit (two awards), Bronze
Star, Defense Meritorious Service Medal (two awards), Meritorious
Service Medal (three awards), Air Medal (three awards: Gold Numeral
One, two Strike/Flight), Defense Commendation Medal (three awards),
Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal, and Navy and Marine Corps
Achievement Medal.
Updated: 12 July 2006
Aircraft Carrier Completes Maintenance; Returns to Bremerton
Story Number: NNS080328-27
Release Date: 3/28/2008 5:00:00 PM
From USS John C. Stennis Public Affairs
ABOARD USS JOHN C. STENNIS, At Sea (NNS) -- USS John C.
Stennis (CVN 74) returned to Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton March
28, after completing a five day at sea period that marked the
end of a successful, but extensive, maintenance period.
On March 27, the crew of the 90,000-ton nuclear powered aircraft
carrier completed its final assessment of the ship's material
readiness, officially ending a six month major maintenance
period.
Stennis departed Bremerton March 24, commencing the five day at
sea period called Sea Trials. The crew immediately began
assessing the ship's installations and repairs, and inspected
and validated the work conducted during the maintenance period,
officially called docking planned incremental availability (DPIA).
"The crew of John C. Stennis, teamed up with the super
professionals of Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, just completed the
most intensive maintenance project I have ever seen," said
Stennis Commanding Officer, Capt. Brad Johanson. "Over the past
six months, this ship has completed $240 million in upgrades and
maintenance work. We have new combat systems upgrades, new
electronic throttle controls, new arresting gear safety control
systems and an extensive suite of new aviation electronic
support systems designed to provide maintenance for the new
MH-60 helicopters."
This underway period is the first time the carrier has been
operational since entering Puget Sound Naval Shipyard drydock on
Sept. 28, after the Stennis and crew returned from a
seven-and-half-month deployment to the Middle East on August 31.
Stennis and its air wing provided support to troops on the
ground in Afghanistan and flew missions in support of ground
forces in Iraq.
Also returning to the ship was Carrier Strike Group 3 (CSG-3).
This is the first time the strike group commander, Rear Adm. M.
Stewart O'Bryan, has embarked Stennis since he took command in
September. Stennis is the flagship for O'Bryan and CSG-3.
"I was pleased with the success of not only the Sea Trials but
the tremendous accomplishment of the entire DPIA," said O'Bryan.
After finishing the intense Sea Trials, the crew will now focus
on preparing for the ship's training cycle and operational
proficiency in preparation for a deployment in 2009.
"It's great to have the ship back and operational!" said
Johanson. "We will now focus our energy and efforts on
increasing our combat proficiency and overall operational
capability."
During Sea Trails, the crew conducted a series of tests and
evaluations on the work that was done during DPIA. While the
ship was in drydock, shipyard workers, contractors and about 600
Stennis Sailors renovated drinking water tanks, main engineering
spaces, aircraft support equipment, combat and self-defense
systems, and berthing spaces.
As Stennis returns to Bremerton, over 411,000 man-hours of work
has been completed. The ship's forces painted 650 spaces and
re-tiled 215 decks. They also cleaned out 295 vents, removed and
refurbished about 200 watertight doors and completed 400 lagging
(wrapping insulation around pipes) jobs.
From CHINFO -
A Day in the Navy
15 April 2008
• On April 15th,
331,889 Active Duty, 70,249 Reserve Component Sailors, with 5,519
Reserves mobilized, and 178,739 civilians are serving in the
Department of the Navy.
• 280 active ships
are in service. 132 (47%) including 5 carriers and 4 amphibious
large deck ships are underway.
• Approximately
11,528 Sailors are deployed on the ground around the world in
support of the Global War or Terror, including 4,975 individual
augmentees in Iraq and 1,497 in Afghanistan, among various other
countries around the world.
• Adm. Gary
Roughead visits the crew of the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS
Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) to address Sailors deployed to the U.S. 5th
Fleet area of operations (AOO). Roughead is visiting the U.S. Naval
Forces Central Command (NAVCENT) AOO to strengthen international
maritime partnerships as part of the Navy’s Cooperative Strategy for
21st Century Seapower and meet with regional leaders in an effort to
increase dialogue and cooperation.
• An HVBSS (Helo
Visit Board Search and Seizure) team is deployed with USS Abraham
Lincoln -- marking the first operational deployment for this
Maritime Expeditionary Security Force capability.
• USS George
Washington (CVN-73), currently operating off the coast of South
America in support of Partnership of Americas 08, is underway to
Yokosuka, Japan, where it will replace USS Kitty Hawk as the United
States’ forward deployed carrier.
• HURREX 08
commences, focusing on training afloat and shore-based commands with
hurricane threat scenarios for use in exercising sortie, evacuation,
emergency preparedness, and recovery and consequence management
procedures.
• USS Hawaii, the
nation’s newest Virginia-class submarine, is underway in the
SOUTHCOM area of responsibility conducting counter illicit
trafficking operations in support of U.S. and participating nation
drug control programs.
• USS Florida is
underway in the Atlantic making final preparations for their first
deployment as a converted SSGN.
• USS Ronald
Reagan (CVN 76), along with embarked Carrier Air Wing 14 (CVW-14)
and Destroyer Squadron Seven (DESRON 7), is underway conducting
Joint Task Force Exercise (JTFEX) 08-5 off the coast of Southern
California in preparation for a regularly scheduled deployment.
• Commander, U.S.
Pacific Fleet’s weekly podcast is being posted on www.cpf.navy.mil.
This week’s podcast discusses the strategic importance of Navy’s
submarines and salutes San Diego, host to the Great White Fleet 100
years ago.
• Commander, U.S.
7th Fleet is meeting in Seoul, Republic of Korea with the new Chief
of Naval operations and the new ROK Fleet Commander for a Combined
Tactical Discussion for the Naval Component Command.
• USS Abraham
Lincoln, USS Mobile Bay, and USS Shoup are conducting a passing
exercise with the Republic of Singapore Navy before making a port
visit to Singapore. Exercise events include flight operations, DLQs,
UNREP dry hook up, and VBSS. During the port visit, USS Abraham
Lincoln will host a reception for the Singapore Chief of the Navy,
RADM Chew Len Weong.
• USS Fort McHenry
and HSV Swift are completing their very successful deployments in
support of Africa Partnership Station. Both ships have been
providing valuable training and engagement opportunities to the West
Africa region. USS Fort McHenry has departed the region while HSV
Swift still has remaining events with Benin and Senegal.
• USS Kitty Hawk,
Carrier Air Wing 5, and Destroyer Squadron 15 are underway in the
Pacific to conduct dual carrier operations with the USS Nimitz
Strike Group.
• USS Port Royal
and USS Hopper are in port Palau where the commanding officers will
meet with Vice President Chin and crew members will meet community
members at events at the Yelch Ball Field, the old Airai Elementary
school and the Kaingungsho Building, State Office.
• USS Chafee is
conducting a goodwill port visit to Osaka, Japan where CDR Heedong
Choi will formally assume command of USS Chafee. The crew will visit
one of Japan’s major metropolitan areas and learn more of the rich
historic and cultural heritage of Osaka.
• Approximately
500 Maritime Expeditionary Security Force (MESF) Sailors in CENTCOM
are providing security onboard MSC ships and security to ships
arriving in the Arabian Gulf while approximately 100 MESF Sailors
are in the Philippines providing embarked and boat security in the
Western Pacific.
• In exercise
CITADEL GALE 08, three simulated hurricanes have made landfall in
the continental United States. CNIC is coordinating the response
effort to the affected regions and installations. Participants
include Navy Region Mid-Atlantic, Navy Region Southeast, US Fleet
Forces, CNIC, C2F, and Navy Personnel Command.
• The Navy
Ceremonial Guard is rehearsing on The White House South Lawn for the
Papal Visit to The White House tomorrow.
• Navy
Installations Command is providing funeral honor support to a total
of 103 funerals for our country’s veterans on 15 April.
• Five staff
members from Naval Hospital Okinawa are deploying to Thailand in
support of PACFLT and III Marine Expeditionary Force MEDCAP/DENTCAP
operations during Cobra Gold exercises.
Navy: Unmanned Combat Squadron by 2025
Aviation Week's DTI | Amy Butler and Robert
Wall | March 2008
This
article first appeared in AviationWeek.com.
The U.S. Navy is calling for competitive
prototyping in preparation for fielding its first squadron of Unmanned
Combat Air Systems (UCAS) by 2025.
NUCAS is expected to replace the Navy's F/A-18s
on aircraft carrier decks, and the system will provide greater range
and time on station than the manned fleet. This shift will project
Navy air power far beyond today's reach, adding more protection to
ships at sea.
This strategy puts the Navy at the forefront of
the Pentagon's efforts to field combat drones; the U.S. Air Force
has decided to create a manned design for its next-generation bomber
for fielding in 2018.
The Navy is conducting an analysis of
alternatives to narrow down its choices for the F/A-18 replacement,
dubbed the F/A-XX program.
In lockstep, officials at Naval Air Systems
Command are formulating an acquisition strategy to build off of work
handled by Northrop Grumman, which is building two NUCAS
demonstrators, according to Capt. Martin Deppe, NUCAS program
manager. Northrop Grumman beat Boeing for the $635 contract to
design and test the suitability of a tailless, low-observable design
operating in and around aircraft carriers.
The first demonstrator flight is set for
November 2009, and carrier trials will be complete in late 2012.
Deppe says the acquisition strategy for a
follow-on to the demonstrator project will likely be ready in 2011.
Though Deppe says he wants to have competing prototypes, the
strategy does not call for new air vehicle designs.
The would-be competitors would simply need to demonstrate the
technologies in an operationally relevant environment. The
contractors could demonstrate their architectures using aircraft
already cleared for carrier ops.
I have a few
photos of Scan Eagle – they were not included in this article
because the file would be too large. If anyone would like to see
the article with the photos (an 865KB file), please email me and I
be happy to send it to you. - Dutch
Subject: China
Lake flies first Navy-owned Scan Eagle test asset
Date: 13-Mar-08
News Release Number: ECL200803131
News Release Copy: By Renee Hatcher NAWCWD Public Affairs The Naval
Unmanned Systems Integration Activity (NUSIA) teamed with NAWCWD’s
Unmanned Systems Technical Project Office and conducted a successful
initial flight of the first unmanned Scan Eagle test vehicle owned
by the Navy on Feb. 29 at China Lake.
“This is a big change of mindset for us,” said Brian Whiteside,
of NUSIA. “Up until this point, all of our unmanned operations had
been done with contractor-owned test vehicles. Now, we have our own
Navy-owned and operated test asset that we can use for our unmanned
operations.”
The Scan Eagle unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) flew locally for
about 30 minutes. The Scan Eagle team was led by Whiteside as the
mission commander. T.J. Zackman was the pilot in command for the
launch and recovery, and Tony Fabiszak was the ground crew. They ran
the mission from a command and control van parked about 50 yards
from the UAV on China Lake’s North Range.
“The system performed as expected,” Whiteside said. “It was a
great success.”
The INSITU Scan Eagle will be used at China Lake as well as other
designated facilities as a test bed for concept of operations
development and UAS integration efforts.
“The demand for UAV operations, support and testing has grown
exponentially,” said Whiteside, a former Navy F/A-18 Hornet pilot.
“It’s really the next step in naval aviation.”
Since 2004, Scan Eagle has logged more than 50,000 hours in
theater providing real-time imagery to tactical commanders and
acting as forward observers to monitor enemy vehicle and personnel
movement, and buildings and terrain in Iraq.
Weighing about 40 pounds, Scan Eagle is four feet long and has a
wingspan just over 10 feet. It can safely fly up to 16,000 feet at a
cruising speed of 60 mph. It is launched via a pneumatic wedge
catapult launcher, flies pre-programmed missions via a GPS-based
navigation system, and is retrieved using a ‘skyhook’ system by
catching a rope hanging from a 50-foot pole.
“We’ll use this system to further the capabilities of UAVs in
general,” Whiteside said.
This Scan Eagle is part of an inventory of Dakota and 14 Pioneer
UASs at China Lake. The team expects to get four more Scan Eagles as
well as SHADOW, and Raven systems.
Currently, Whiteside and his team are working at China Lake on a
video targeting demonstration with Scan Eagle. They are also
performing payload modifications, and rapid deployment testing in
support of the global war on terrorism.
With increasing UAS operations at China Lake, the team has put a
lot of effort into figuring out how best to integrate unmanned
systems into the local operating airspace.
“We have worked very closely with the folks at Range Safety to
come up with procedures for airspace integration,” Whiteside said.
Future efforts include integration work with the Naval Strike Air
Warfare Center, Special Operations Command, Naval Post Graduate
School, and the Joint UAS Center of Excellence. Whiteside said he is
looking forward to great advancements in unmanned systems.
“UAVs are the next logical step in aviation,” Whiteside said.
“There will always be a need for pilots but I believe we will see a
big shift during the next 30 years toward unmanned systems.”
Welcome to
U.S. Air Force AIM Points
F-35 JSF engines in critical tests as
Congress deliberates
BY: Graham Warwick, Flight International
03/28/2008
Altitude
testing of a pre-development General Electric/Rolls-Royce F136
alternative engine has been completed as Pratt & Whitney prepares
for critical tests of its F135 primary engine for the Lockheed
Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.
The tests come
as U.S. Congress deliberates whether to overturn the Department of
Defense's decision to cancel the F136 to save money. Testifying in
late March, the U.S. Air Force leadership said they would prefer to
keep both engines, but that there was an issue of affordability.
The first
system development and demonstration F136 is scheduled to run early
in 2009, but the GE/R-R Fighter Engine Team has been using "pre-SDD"
engines fitted with production-representative fan, augmentor and
controls to conduct early conventional take-off and landing and
short take-off and vertical landing testing.
GE/R-R
completed high-altitude afterburner testing of a pre-SDD F136 in
late March at the USAF's Arnold Engineering Development Center in
Tennessee. The tests included the common exhaust hardware for the
F-35. A second pre-SDD engine is undergoing CTOL and STOVL testing
at GE's outdoor site in Peebles, Ohio.
In April, P&W
will test an instrumented F135 to confirm the root cause and verify
the corrective action for the low-pressure turbine blade failure
that affected two STOVL engines. The company believes the high-cycle
fatigue failure results from vibration caused by interaction of the
third-stage blades and vanes.
"We intend to
demonstrate we can turn the phenomenon on, and prove we can turn it
off," says Bill Gostic, F135 programme manager. The test will be
repeated in September using an engine with redesigned third-stage
blades and vanes, "to show the redesign turns it off", he says. The
redesign uses two different vane spacings to disrupt the vibration.
P&W also hopes the April test
will validate a "viable limited flight envelope" for the
unmodified engine. This would allow Lockheed to begin STOVL
testing with the first F-35B in September. Otherwise, STOVL
testing will be delayed until December, after the redesigned
engine has been installed, says Gostic. The F-35B is expected to
begin CTOL-mode flight tests in June.
NNS080328-22. Oak Harbor Holds Public Hearing for
P-8A MMA
By Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class
Tucker M. Yates, Fleet Public Affairs Center, Det. Northwest
OAK HARBOR, Wash. (NNS) -- A public hearing
for the introduction of the P-8A "Poseidon" Multi-Mission Maritime
Aircraft (MMA) and environmental impact statement presentation were
held at the Oak Harbor School District office, March 26.
The hearing was held as the Navy prepares to
transition from the P-3C Orion to the P-8A from 2012 to 2019. The
transition affects the community due to four existing P-3C Patrol
Squadrons (VPs) presently in service on nearby Naval Air Station
(NAS) Whidbey Island.
This transitional period will lead to
between three and seven P-8A squadrons being stationed on the base
depending on which of the six alternatives presented by the Navy is
selected. The preferred alternative would maintain four squadrons at
NAS Whidbey Island.
"Under the requirements for environmental
study, we have to look at different options and different
alternatives, so for this action we have six different alternatives,
all involving the same bases, but differences in the number of
squadrons going to each base," said Rick Keys, a project officer for
the P-8A Fleet Introduction with U.S. Fleet Forces Command, based in
Norfolk.
"[The preferred alternative] meets
operational requirements and also, from a cost standpoint, has
advantages. [The Office of] the Secretary of the Navy looks at cost,
operational requirements and the environmental impact and balances
all of those factors."
There are three other Navy and Marine Corps
installations around the fleet and eight additional squadrons also
involved in the transition, NAS Jacksonville, Fla., NAS North
Island, Calif., and Marine Corps Base Hawaii (MCBH) Kaneohe Bay. The
same type of hearing will be held at these installations April 1,
for MCBH Kaneohe Bay, April 3, for NAS North Island, and April 9,
for NAS Jacksonville, as an opportunity for the public to voice
their concerns over the environmental and economic impacts this
transition will have on their communities.
"We're hoping to tell them what the Navy
proposes to do and that is to replace the old P-3 with a newer
airplane and explain to them what that airplane is and how it will
affect their lives," said Keys. "The Navy looks at all the comments
that we get through this process and the public may point out an
area we didn't study or where we may have a mistake in our
assumptions. That's why this is a draft environmental impact
statement and we'll take those inputs we get into making a final
environmental impact statement, correcting any errors and looking
into anything the public feels we may need to look into."
The transition will reduce the number of
aircraft and personnel required to accomplish the VP mission from
120 aircraft to 84 and 4,760 personnel to 3,309, leading to a more
cost-effective and efficient force for the squadrons.
The event was split into two sessions. The
first was a two-hour information session with display stations
featuring the processes and impacts of the transition with subject
matter experts to answer any more in-depth questions an attendee
might have. This was followed by the two-hour public hearing
presided over by Capt. Keith Allred, Navy and Marine Corps Trial
Judiciary, Western Judicial Circuit, where members of the local
community were afforded the opportunity to voice their comments and
concerns with a three-minute time constraint per individual.
John Phillips, NAS Whidbey Island natural
resources manager, is acting as environmental liaison between the
installation and Fleet Forces.
"With the preferred alternative it's pretty
much status quo and business as usual, there'll be new hangars and
new infrastructures, but no impact as far as wetlands or anything
like that," said Phillips. "If one of the larger alternatives is
selected then there is a need to expand the flight line and tarmac
in the area where the P-3s currently are, which is surrounded by
wetlands almost entirely on three sides."
Members of the local military community were
glad the citizens were provided a venue to be educated and speak
their mind on the future of the Navy.
"We're happy that we gave the public the
opportunity to comment on the future of P-8 at NAS Whidbey Island,"
said Capt. Gerral David, commanding officer of NAS Whidbey Island.
People who may have missed the public hearing still have an
opportunity to comment on the future of P-8A one of three ways.
Concerned citizens may visit
www.MMAEIS.com, or mail their concerns to Commander, Naval
Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic, Attn: MMA PM, 6506
Hampton Blvd. Norfolk, VA 23508-1278.
Boeing, Textron
Get $10.4 Billion V-22 Aircraft Award By Tony Capaccio
March 28 (Bloomberg) --
Boeing Co. and
Textron Inc. received a $10.4 billion contract for the V-22
Osprey that ensures production of 167 more of the aircraft through
2012, the Pentagon said today.
The multiyear contract will save as much as
$427 million over annual contracts to manufacture the tilt-rotor
plane, the Pentagon estimated. The contract calls for building 141
of the planes for the Marine Corps and 26 for the Air Force, a
Pentagon news release said. The Defense Department had 132 aircraft
on order before today's contract announcement.
``This is good for a variety of reasons,
stability of the production line for an aircraft we know we need and
stability for jobs,'' said Representative
Joe Sestak, a Pennsylvania Democrat. It also has a cost savings
and ``heaven knows, we need that,'' said Sestak, who represents a
district where Boeing builds its part of the aircraft.
The V-22 has rotors that tilt so it can take
off and land like a helicopter. The military sees it as useful for
long-range Marine Corps and commando missions.
The program has weathered investigations,
design reviews and a suspension of flight testing for 17 months in
late 2000 after two crashes that year that killed 23 Marines. The
crashes were attributed to an aerodynamic condition that testing
failed to evaluate and software and hydraulics flaws that have since
been fixed.
Flying in Combat
A Marine V-22 squadron has been flying from Al
Asad Air Base in Iraq since October 2007 in the first combat
deployment of the aircraft.
The Pentagon awards multiyear contracts only
when acquisition officials are confident a program is stable and the
contractors can execute the terms. A multiyear contract allows
manufacturers to operate more efficiently and is almost impossible
to terminate, said
Richard Aboulafia, an aerospace analyst with the Fairfax,
Virginia-based Teal Group.
``This should bring costs down'' for the V-22,
Aboulafia said. ``More importantly,'' the new contract ``removes any
remaining doubt about this being a full production program.''
The total program for 458 aircraft is estimated
to cost $54 billion in inflation-adjusted dollars, including
research, development and production, the Pentagon said in its
latest tally of major weapons program costs. The program in 2002 was
estimated to cost $46.2 billion, according to Pentagon figures.
Attach Wings, Tail
Textron's Fort Worth, Texas-based Bell Helicopter unit co-
produces the Osprey with Boeing's Ridley Township, Pennsylvania,
facility.
Boeing makes the fuselage. Bell mates the wings and the tail to
the fuselage and conducts flight tests.
Textron
rose as high as $55.80 in after-hours trading. The stock closed
at $54.62 in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. Boeing
hovered around its
closing price of $73.47.
``The multiyear procurement sets a strong positive course for
the V-22 Osprey program,'' Gene Cunningham, vice president of
the Bell Boeing Program Office in Amarillo, Texas, said in an
e-mailed statement. ``The contract allows the industry team to
stabilize production plans, creates savings, and increases the
number of aircraft being produced,'' he said.
Commander Naval Air Forces Visits NAS Whidbey Island
Story Number: NNS080331-17
Release Date: 3/31/2008 3:04:00 PM
By
Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Tucker M. Yates, Fleet
Public Affairs Center, Det. Northwest
OAK HARBOR,
Wash. (NNS) -- Commander, Naval Air Forces visited Naval Air
Station (NAS) Whidbey Island for a familiarization tour, March
24-25.
Vice Adm. Tom Kilcline and Force Master Chief (AW/SW) James
Abeyta, met with officers and senior enlisted from Commander
Patrol and Reconnaissance Wing (CPRW) 10, Commander Electronic
Attack Wing Pacific (CVWP) and NAS Whidbey Island to discuss
their concerns and share some experiences. Kilcline also wanted
to praise the Sailors of these commands for the capabilities
they provide as part of naval aviation.
"Naval aviation is out there and gets it done; it's the pointy
end of the spear," said Kilcline. "We are the best air force in
the world with unique capabilities that complement our surface,
subsurface and Marine Force. You should be proud that you're key
to the success of our Navy-Marine team."
During his visit, Kilcline also discussed the importance of
safety, the value of diversity and equality in our force, and
standards of conduct.
"He was spot on and very honest [in his presentation]. He's
exceptionally motivated, really loves his job and wants us to
know that he's there for us and concerned about our well-being,"
said CVWP Command Master Chief (SW/AW) Richard Rose. "He's a
very passionate and confident man, a good man to have as our
boss."
Those in attendance were afforded the opportunity to get
Kilcline's input on "Big Navy" concerns that affect them
directly, including upcoming transitions to the P-8A Poseidon
and EA-18G Growler, and associated advances in their
capabilities.
"I absolutely enjoyed the conversation that he had with the VAQ
(Electronic Attack Squadron) community," said Cmdr. John
Thompson, VAQ-130 commanding officer. "He addressed a lot of key
issues, mainly our support in the coming years of the
[expeditionary force]; I'm glad to hear that this is part of his
concern. Also, I was very interested in his commitment to the
next generation jammer [for the EA-18G]."
Kilcline's interest in the commands' present and future assets
was valued by those involved, and his understanding of their
contributions let them know their work is important to the war
effort.
"From the admiral's perspective, he clearly understands the
capabilities we bring forward to support Department of Defense,
our fleet commanders, and our combatant commanders," said Capt.
Kenneth Seliga, commodore of CPRW-10. "We bring this diverse
piece of having VQ [Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron] assets up
here and he wanted to get a look at those capabilities and what
they provide. [The VQ community members] appreciate the level of
engagement when you have a three-star take time out of his
schedule to come up and get a better understanding and show his
appreciation for what they are doing in dynamic places around
the world."
Defense spending
beacons
The Washington Times -
April 1, 2008
By John R. Guardiano - Is America spending too much or too
little on defense? That"s a fair and crucial question,
especially at a time of war, when U.S. soldiers, sailors, airmen
and Marines are dying overseas. But because advocates on both
sides of the issue are asking the wrong questions, recent media
analysis of the issue has been ill-informed and misplaced.
Critics of increased defense spending argue correctly that, in
absolute dollar terms, the United States spends more on defense
than at any time in its history. In addition, they note, the
U.S. spends more on defense than the next 10 countries combined.
Therefore, they argue, defense spending is more than adequate.
Proponents of increased defense spending counter that a dollar
today is worth a lot less than in it was in previous eras.
Moreover, they add, as a share of the gross domestic product
(GDP), defense spending is at a historic low during a time of
war.
The United States spends less than 4 percent of its GDP on
defense. By contrast, Defense spending averaged some 14 percent
of GDP in the Korean War, nearly 10 percent during the Vietnam
War, and more than 33 percent during World War II.
Clearly, both sides in this debate have legitimate contextual
points; however, both sides miss the mark.
Defense spending relative to that of other nations is an
unhelpful comparison because the United States isn't like other
nations. America is the world's sole remaining superpower, with
far-reaching obligations to protect U.S. national security
interests worldwide.
Moreover, American considers its soldiers, sailors, airmen and
Marines to be its greatest military asset. Thus, we are
unwilling to sacrifice their lives when technology can prevent
the loss of life. That's one important reason America has
invested literally hundreds of billions of dollars in advanced
weapons systems: We know dollars spent today can save lives
tomorrow.
In fact, when you consider the relative loss of American life
since 1945 (when the Cold War began), it is clear that U.S.
defense spending has been money well-spent. Indeed, by any
historical comparison, American casualties have been remarkably
low, thanks in large part to our nation's investment in weapon
systems that have minimized our troops' vulnerability to danger.
There was a well-known "procurement holiday" in the 1990s;
however, since Sept. 11, 2001, money for new procurement has
risen rather substantially. But as critics of increased defense
spending point out, this new money is not necessarily being
well-appropriated. Spending, after all, must be tied to a
procurement plan, which, in turn, must correspond with an
overarching military strategy.
As it turns out, there is a National Defense Strategy that
governs defense procurement planning. The March 2005 document
wisely calls for a military that can project power from the
"global commons" — i.e., space, cyberspace, international waters
and airspace — to distant and austere environments that have
little or no existing infrastructure.
The Cold War, after all, is over. The fight today is not in
established Europe, but in places like Kandahar, Fallujah,
Mindanao and Mogadishu — undeveloped urban frontiers for which a
Cold War military is ill-suited.
That's why the U.S. military has embarked upon its greatest
transformation since the World War II, some 65 years ago. The
"information revolution" of the last quarter-century has
transformed the commercial world, but much less so the
bureaucratically insular U.S. military. Consequently,
19-year-old civilians today typically have more technology at
their disposal than 19-year-old soldiers.
This must change. There's no reason, save for bureaucratic
inertia, policy myopia, and budgetary stinginess, that our
troops in harm's way can't be the beneficiaries of the best
technologies available.
Indeed, soldiers and Marines shouldn't have to walk into
insurgent-infested buildings dumb, deaf and blind, without the
benefit of advanced reconnaissance, surveillance and
communication capabilities, which tell them what lurks behind
hidden doors. Yet, to an extent I believe would shock the
public, that's often the case today.
But of course, new communication systems, technologies and
weapon systems don't come cheap; they cost a lot of money — and
they take time to develop.
Moreover, because the U.S. military is pushing the technological
envelope, it doesn't always know what these new capabilities
will cost. Any technology development program, after all,
necessarily involves an element of (calculated) development
risk; otherwise, there can be no military-technological
progress.
Can America defend itself without making this investment in
high-tech weapon systems? Yes, of course; but the tradeoff will
be many more dead and wounded, many more civilian deaths, and
far greater collateral damage in any future conflict.
That's why, if anything, America needs to spend more on
defense today, both in absolute and relative terms, than it has
throughout its history: because our tolerance for casualties is
far weaker than it has been historically.
For example, America suffered more dead in solitary World War II
training exercises than we have suffered in the entire Iraq war.
Yet, policymakers fret over Iraq war casualties as if they are a
harbinger of strategic disaster.
They are not. American casualties are, however, a reflection of
our nation's understandable and admirable aversion to the loss
of human life. For that reason, and for that reason alone,
America needs to spend much more on defense. We pay either in
dollars today or in lives lost tomorrow.
John R. Guardiano is a Marine Corps veteran of the Iraq war
and a Navy Reserve officer. The views expressed here are his own
and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Navy or Marine
Corps.
GAO Blasts Weapons Budget
Cost Overruns Hit $295 Billion
By Dana Hedgpeth
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, April 1, 2008; A01
Government auditors issued a scathing review
yesterday of dozens of
the Pentagon's biggest weapons systems, saying ships, aircraft
and satellites are billions of dollars over budget and years behind
schedule.
The
Government Accountability Office found that 95 major systems
have exceeded their original budgets by a total of $295 billion,
bringing their total cost to $1.6 trillion, and are delivered almost
two years late on average. In addition, none of the systems that the
GAO looked at had met all of the standards for best management
practices during their development stages.
Auditors said the
Defense Department showed few signs of improvement since the GAO
began issuing its annual assessments of selected weapons systems six
years ago. "It's not getting any better by any means," said Michael
Sullivan, director of the GAO's acquisition and sourcing team. "It's
taking longer and costing more."
Chris Isleib, a Pentagon spokesman, said in a
written statement, "We'd like to look at what GAO has said, and then
at the appropriate time make an informed comment."
The Pentagon has doubled the amount it has
committed to new systems, from $790 billion in 2000 to $1.6 trillion
last year, according to the 205-page GAO report. Total acquisition
costs in 2007 for major defense programs increased 26 percent from
first estimates. In 2000, 75 programs had cost increases totaling 6
percent. Development costs in 2007 for the systems rose 40 percent
from initial projections, compared with 27 percent in 2000. Current
programs are delivered 21 months late on average, five months later
than in 2000.
"In most cases, programs also failed to deliver
capabilities when promised -- often forcing war fighters to spend
additional funds on maintaining" existing weapons systems, the
report says.
The GAO chose 72 of the 95 systems to examine,
based on high-dollar value and congressional interest. The various
systems were at different stages of the acquisition process over the
last year.
The report details such projects as the Navy's
$5.2 billion Littoral Combat Ship, which has had such extensive
troubles that the service expects the cost of its first two ships to
exceed their combined budget of $472 million by more than 100
percent. The Navy canceled construction of the planned third and
fourth ships by
Lockheed Martin and
General Dynamics, the prime contractors on the project.
The government is facing higher development
costs on eight major programs, including Lockheed Martin's Joint
Strike Fighter and
Boeing's Future Combat Systems, a technology to connect unmanned
aircraft and vehicles. The prices for those two programs have risen
36 percent and 40 percent, respectively, from the initial contracts,
the GAO said, partly because the government wants "new and unproven
technologies" and did not undertake early analysis to make sure its
requirements could be met.
In a statement, Lockheed said that the Joint
Strike Fighter "is performing solidly, making outstanding technical
progress in the context of the most complex aircraft ever built" and
that "the bedrock and the cornerstone" of the F-35 program have been
"affordability and cost containment."
In another case, the initial contract target
price of Boeing's program to modernize avionics in the
C-130 cargo plane is expected to skyrocket 323 percent, to $2
billion. Another Boeing program, for a radio system, is up 310
percent, to $966 million.
"Boeing's commitment is to deliver on our
promises to our military customers and meeting their requirements in
the most cost-effective way possible," the company said in a
statement.
The GAO's Sullivan said the reasons for the
cost overruns and delays are threefold: There are too many programs
chasing too few dollars; technologies are often not mature enough to
go into production; and it takes too long to design, develop and
produce a system.
"They're asking for something that they're not
sure can be built, given existing technologies, and that's risky,"
Sullivan said in an interview.
Costs of some systems were driven up as much as
72 percent when changes were made to the program requirements after
development of the system had begun, the report says. Half of the
programs studied had 25 percent increases in the expected lines of
code in their software.
Steven L. Schooner, co-director of the
government procurement law program at
George Washington University, said the GAO's report reveals the
recurring problems the Pentagon faces with its costly procurements.
"The nature of major weapon systems development
is that you have to expect that the initial estimates, and typically
the initial contracts, are overly optimistic and unrealistic," he
said. "Unfortunately the purchaser -- the government -- typically
lacks the discipline to freeze the configuration such that the
contractor has any reasonable chance of developing what it promised
on time and for the price promised."
Defense Department officials have tried to
improve the procurement process, the GAO said, by doing more
planning and review in the early stages of a contract. But "these
significant policy changes have not yet translated into best
practices on individual programs," Gene L. Dodaro, acting
comptroller general of the GAO, wrote in the report.
"Flagship acquisitions, as well as many other
top priorities in each of the services, continue to cost
significantly more, take longer to produce, and deliver less than
was promised," Dodaro said. "This is likely to continue until the
overall environment for weapon system acquisitions changes."
==================
Jamming Threats Proliferating, Kehler Says:
In addition to the pursuit of
militarized anti-satellite capabilities by certain countries, Gen.
Robert Kehler, head of Air Force Space Command, told defense
reporters in Washington Tuesday that a number of simpler
technologies from the Cold War are proliferating, including GPS
jamming technology. He called the expansion of such technology
"fairly wide," with countries and even non-state actors able to buy
rudimentary laser jammers capable of "dazzling" certain space
sensors. There are a number of countries, Russia being one of the
more prominent, he said, that produce jammers on the open market.
Kehler added that the technology has progressed to the point where
someone could conceivably construct the capability without a lot of
technical competence. The Air Force is working hard to counter these
capabilities, and the upcoming GPS III satellite will have more of a
capability to combat these tools, he said.
Turning a Corner in
Space: Since the
Air Force handles nearly 90 percent of the Defense
Department's space-related programs, Air Force Space Command
boss Gen. Robert Kehler told defense reporters in Washington
Tuesday, "We believe the space mission is primarily an Air
Force responsibility." In the early vestiges of a
Congressionally directed roles and missions review, Kehler
said, "I personally don't see a major change to that." He
doesn't think now is the time to talk about a separate space
force, and neither does he think it's necessary to change
current law giving USAF the space mission outright but he
didn't rule it out, saying, it's "something we have to go
look at." In Kehler's view, the premier space service has
fulfilled many of the concerns of the 2001 Rumsfeld space
commission, saying it has made significant improvements in
the development of its space cadre and has "turned the
corner" on acquisition processes. And, he said, AFSPC has
effectively implemented most of the commission's concerns on
management and organization. However, he said that there
still are outstanding questions about the relationship
between the Intelligence Community black space and DOD white
space activities. Although Kehler indicated cooperation
between the two communities is far better today than in the
past, he said, "I think there is still more to be done in
regards to how we plan together, how we leverage resources
together." – from AFA magazine on-line
From: Air Force Magazine Online [mailto:DailyReport@afa.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 11:22 PM
Subject: Daily Report
Saving Time and Money:
Northrop Grumman reports that it has shaved center fuselage
assembly time on the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter,
cutting it about 28 percent since the system development and
demonstration phase. In an
April 1 release, the company notes that it has begun
assembling the first production JSF, a "weight-optimized" F-35A
conventional takeoff and landing variant designated AF-6 and
destined for USAF. "Jig loading the AF-6 center fuselage is
significant because it shows the F-35 program is successfully
transitioning" from SDD into production, said Janis Pamiljans,
VP and F-35 program manager for Northrop's Integrated Systems.
She noted that the company had followed a "disciplined approach
to managing costs and engineering changes" to be able to reduce
assembly time. According to the release, Northrop began assembly
the AF-6 center fuselage "about one week sooner than the date
indicated by the F-35 program's master schedule."
USAF joins Navy in warning of 'fighter gap'
BY: John T. Bennett, Defense News
04/10/2008
U.S. Air Force
and Navy officials gave Congress a bleak assessment of the
Pentagon's future fighter fleet, warning lawmakers the military
might be 900 fighter jets short of what it will need around 2020.
Senior naval
officials in the last few months have talked publicly about a
"fighter gap" between 2015 and 2025, during which time they say the
Navy will be short of the planes they expect would be needed for the
Navy to carry out possible missions. During an April 9 Senate Armed
Services airland subcommittee hearing, Rear Adm. Allen Myers,
director of the service's air warfare division, indicated the sea
service's gap could be about 70 planes deep.
As panel
members were still digesting that figure, senior Air Force officials
dropped their own acquisition bomb. Air Force Lt. Gen. Daniel
Darnell indicated his service could face an even larger deficit of
needed fighters, possibly as large as "over 800 fighters" between
2017 and 2024. Darnell is the Air Force's deputy chief of staff for
air, space and information operations, plans and requirements.
Service
spokeswoman Lt. Col. Jennifer Cassidy confirmed the 800 fighter
figure about an hour after the hearing was gaveled closed by the
panel’s chairman, Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn.
Part of that
so-called "gap" reflects senior Air Force leaders' staunch belief in
the need to field about 380 Lockheed Martin-built F-22 Raptors. The
Office of the Secretary of Defense, including powerful Deputy
Defense Secretary Gordon England, has repeatedly shot down the
service's intentions, holding firm to the planned buy of 183.
But even if the
service eventually wins out in the ongoing F-22 debate and gets
around 400 Raptors, "that won't completely make up the gap," Lt.
Gen. Donald Hoffman, military deputy to the service's acquisition
chief, told reporters following the hearing.
The gap "is all
about the JSF production rate," he said, referring to how quickly -
and how many - of Lockheed's tri-service, international F-35 Joint
Strike Fighters the Air Force can buy between now and then.
Lockheed is
building the multibillion-dollar fighter for the U.S. Air Force,
Navy and Marine Corps, as well as about a dozen international
partners. But while attempting to get a grasp on how it can manage
its "fighter gap," Navy officials have floated the idea of delaying
its version of the F-35 in favor of buying new - and upgrading older
- Boeing-made F/A-18 Hornets.
However, if
naval officials opt for such a plan, it would send ripple waves
across the trans-Atlantic fighter program, Hoffman warned.
"We have very
tight room for hiccups with the JSF schedule," he told reporters.
"If one [participant] changes its schedule, that'll have adverse
effects for all of us."
Officials from
both services told the subcommittee they have launched a slate of
reviews aimed at determining how to manage their perceived tactical
aircraft gaps.
The Navy
expects by the end of the summer to have sufficient data on its gap
to start making decisions on how best to manage it, according to
Myers and William Balderson, deputy assistant Navy secretary for air
programs.
"It is our
challenge" during the remainder of the 2009 budget cycle, and while
building the 2010 Navy budget request, to begin figuring out how to
fill the sea service's gap, Myers told a reporter.
The Air Force,
meantime, already has launched its own review to determine how many
legacy F-15s and F-16s it might have to try and keep operationally
fit to help manage its perceived fighter deficit, Hoffman said.
The handful of
panel members who attended the session were sympathetic to each
service's tales of woe. Near the conclusion of the session,
Lieberman said the subcommittee will do "everything within our power
to stretch" federal resources so the officials could buy what they
feel is needed to conduct future missions.
Hoffman also
told the subcommittee a decision is needed on whether the Air Force
will be granted a budget plus-up for more F-22As by November.
Hoffman said a decision must come by November so the service can
lock in another significant purchase - it has been buying 20 Raptors
a year.
Such a move would allow the
service to avoid cost growth, which he says is inevitable if no
decision is made by late this year because that's when some F-22
component suppliers will cease work on their portions of the
advanced fighters. Restarting such work would cost more than
keeping those production facilities humming at current speeds,
Hoffman said. - From U.S. Air Force AIM Points
Flag Officer Assignments
Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary
Roughead announced the following flag officer assignments:
Rear Adm. (lower half) Townsend G. Alexander
is being assigned as commander, Navy Region Southeast, Jacksonville,
Fla. Alexander is currently serving as commander, Navy Region
Hawaii/commander, Naval Surface Group, MIDPAC, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.
Rear Admiral Townsend G. "Tim" Alexander
Commander, Navy Region Hawaii
Commander, Naval Surface Group Middle Pacific
Rear
Admiral Tim Alexander graduated from the University of Colorado in 1978,
and upon completion of Aviation Officer Candidate School in March, 1981
was commissioned an Ensign. In November of that year he was designated a
naval aviator.
Operational tours include assignments with the Sea Snakes of Helicopter
Antisubmarine Squadron (Light) (HSL) 33, the HSL-46 Grandmasters (three
tours), and USS Nassau (LHA 4). Rear Adm. Alexander served in a
variety of billets including detachment maintenance officer and officer
in charge, squadron NATOPS Officer, Quality Assurance Officer,
Operations Officer, Maintenance Officer, Executive Officer and
Commanding Officer. He served as Air Boss onboard Nassau during
Operations Noble Anvil and Allied Force in 1999.
Tours ashore have included the Air Wolves of HSL-40, The Naval War
College, Chief of Naval Operations staff, the Joint Staff, and Naval
Base Coronado. During these tours he served as Quality Assurance Officer
and instructor pilot, flag aide, aviation programs analyst, Division
Chief and Commanding Officer.
Rear Adm. Alexander was awarded a Master of Arts from the Naval War
College in 1992 and attended the Armed Forces Staff College in 1998. He
was recognized by the Naval Helicopter Association as a member of the
1993 Aircrew of the Year (Embarked) and in 1989 he received the Rear
Adm. Allan G. Paulson award for inspirational leadership from Commander,
Helicopter Sea Control Wing 3.
Rear Adm. Alexander assumed his current duties as Commander, Navy Region
Hawaii and Commander, Naval Surface Group Middle Pacific in August,
2006. His personal awards include the Defense Superior Service Medal,
Legion of Merit, Meritorious Service Medal (three awards), the Navy and
Marine Corps Commendation Medal (four awards), the Joint Service
Achievement Medal and the Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal.
Updated: 13 September 2007
Rear Adm. (lower half) Raymond E. Berube is
being assigned as commander,Naval Inventory Control Point
Philadelphia/Mechanicsburg, Philadelphia,Pa. Berube is currently serving as commander,
Fleet and Industrial Supply Centers, San Diego, Calif.
Rear Adm. (lower half) William A. Brown is
being assigned as commander, fleet and Industrial Supply Centers, San Diego,
Calif. Brown is currently serving as director, Logistics/Fleet
Supply Office, N41, U.S.Fleet Forces Command, Norfolk, Va.
Rear Adm. (lower half) Wendi B. Carpenter is
being assigned as commander, Navy Warfare Development Command,
Norfolk, Va. Carpenter is currently serving as area commander/deputy
commander, Second Fleet,Norfolk, Va.
Rear Admiral Wendi B. Carpenter
Deputy Commander, Second Fleet
Rear
Admiral Wendi Carpenter is the daughter of a career non-commissioned Air
Force Officer (NCOIC) and was raised throughout the United States. She
holds a Bachelor of Science from the University of Georgia with a major
in Psychology and has pursued graduate studies in Marketing.
Rear Adm. Carpenter began her naval career in October 1977, when she
reported to Aviation Officer Candidate School, Naval Air Staiton
(NAS) Pensacola, Fla., with Class 19-77. She was designated a Naval
Aviator in July 1979 and was assigned as the Navy’s first Selectively
Retained Graduate Instructor Pilot (SERGRAD) in the T-44 aircraft at
Training Squadron (VT) 31, NAS Corpus Christi, Texas.
Following her tour as an instructor pilot, Rear Adm. Carpenter was
ordered to sea duty at Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron (VQ) 3
(TACAMO), NAS Barbers Point, Hawaii, where she served as a Mission
Commander and Aircraft Commander in the EC130F/G/Q aircraft. She
deployed throughout the Pacific and the western U.S. and Alaska in
support of the nation’s strategic nuclear triad.
After completing a shore assignment at the Naval Military Personnel
Command as an Aviation Junior Officer Assignments Officer, Rear Adm.
Carpenter left active duty and accepted a reserve commission in February
1985.
Rear Adm. Carpenter’s Reserve Unit Executive Officer assignments include
Commander, Carrier Group 4 0466, Naval Air Facility Commander in Chief,
U.S. Naval Forces Europe (CINCUSNAVEUR) Joint Task Force Contingency
Headquarters Unit DET 513, and Naval Reserve Commander, 6th Fleet DET
802.
Rear Adm. Carpenter’s Reserve Unit Commanding Officer assignments
include Officer in Charge of VR 506 and CINCUSNAVEUR DET 108. Under her
leadership as Commanding Officer of Reserve Deputy Chief of Naval
Operations, Fleet Readiness and Logistics (DCNO N4 106), the 75 member
CNO staff unit shared the FY01 DON CIO Award for “E Business” in
government. She also had a follow-on Commanding Officer tour with Naval
Reserve Joint Force Air Component Commander 0186, assigned to
Commander, 2nd Fleet.
Rear Adm. Carpenter's Flag assignments include: Deputy Commander of Navy
Region Southeast, Jacksonville, Fla. from October 2004- September 2005,
acting Director, OPNAV N31 (Information, Plans, Security Division) from
April 2005-May 2005, and Vice Director, Standing Joint Forces HQ
(SJFHQ), U.S. Joint Forces Command from December 2004-September 2006.
Rear Adm. Carpenter currently serves as Deputy Commander, 2nd Fleet.
Rear Adm. Carpenter’s awards include the Defense Superior Service Medal,
Legion of Merit (2 awards), Meritorious Service Medal, Navy Commendation
Medal (5 awards), Navy Achievement Medal, and various units awards. She
has accumulated over 3500 military flight hours. Rear Adm. Carpenter is
a distinguished graduate of the Naval War College Command and Staff
College and completed Capstone with class 06-02. Additionally, she has
completed executive programs and Reserve Component courses at the
National Defense University, UNC Chapel Hill, and Defense Acquisition
University.
Updated: 13 September 2007
Rear Adm. (lower half) John N. Christenson is
being assigned as commander, Carrier Strike Group Twelve, Norfolk,
Va. Christenson is currently serving as vice commander, Naval Mine
and Anti-Submarine Warfare Command, Corpus Christi, Texas.
Rear Adm. Kenneth W. Deutsch is being assigned
as deputy chief of staff for capabilities and resource integrations, N8,
U.S. Fleet Forces Command, Norfolk, Va. Deutsch is currently
serving as director, warfare integrations, N6F/N83, Office of the Chief of
Naval Operations,Washington, D.C.
Rear Admiral Kenneth William Deutsch
Director, Warfare Integration (N6F)
Rear
Admiral Kenneth William Deutsch is a native of Burlington, Ill. He
attended Illinois State University, and received his commission in
August 1978 through the Aviation Reserve Officer Candidate (AVROC)
Program. In July 1979 he was designated a Naval Flight Officer.
In February 1980, Rear Adm. Deutsch joined Patrol Squadron 16 and
completed deployments to Sigonella, Sicily; Bermuda/Cubi Point, Republic
of the Philippines; and Rota, Spain/Lajes, Azores. In July 1983 he
reported to Patrol Squadron 30, the Fleet Replacement Squadron, where he
served as Communications Officer, Tactical Training Team (TTT)
Instructor, and NFO Training Officer.
In July 1986, Rear Adm. Deutsch reported to Commander, Battle Force 7th
Fleet/Commander, Carrier Group 5, homeported in Cubi Pt, Republic of the
Philippines, where he served as Flag Secretary and Flag Lieutenant.
While on board the staff, he qualified as Flag Tactical Action Officer
and served on several flagships, including USS Midway (CV 41) and
USS Ranger (CV 61). In September 1987 the Carrier Group 5 staff
became the first Joint Task Force Middle East staff, and he served as
Flag Lieutenant for the Commander, completing a six-month deployment to
the Persian Gulf and the Indian Ocean on board USS Long Beach
(CGN 9) and USS Iowa (BB 61) during the Iran/Iraq War and
Operation Earnest Will.
He reported in August 1988 to the Bureau of Naval Personnel in
Washington where he served as the VP Shore and then Sea Detailer in the
Aviation Assignment Branch.
In November 1990, Rear Adm. Deutsch joined Patrol Squadron 5 as
Assistant Maintenance Officer and Maintenance Officer, completing a
Rota/Lajes deployment. Upon completion of this tour in February 1992, he
reported to Patrol Wing 11 where he served as Operations Officer.
In April 1994, Rear Adm. Deutsch reported to Patrol Squadron 24 as the
Executive Officer, completing a deployment to Keflavik, Iceland, prior
to the squadron’s decommissioning in May 1995. He then reported to
Patrol Squadron 45 where he served as Executive Officer and Commanding
Officer, deploying to Roosevelt Roads, Puerto Rico and Sigonella,
Sicily.
In June 1997 he reported to the Commander of Joint Task Force 67,
homeported in Naples, Italy, where he served as the Assistant Chief of
Staff for Operations.
Rear Adm. Deutsch assumed command of Patrol and Reconnaissance Wing 5,
homeported in Brunswick Maine, in May 1999.
He reported to The Joint Chiefs of Staff in October 2000 where he served
as the Chief, Communications and Computer Networks Division, J6T, in the
C4 Systems Directorate, J6.
Following his selection for Rear Adm., he reported to the OPNAV staff in
October 2002 where he served on the N6N7 staff as the Deputy for
Resources and Requirements in the Space, Information Warfare, Command
and Control Division, N61R.
In October 2003 Rear Adm. Deutsch assumed the duties of Commander,
Patrol and Reconnaissance Force 7th Fleet, Commander Patrol and
Reconnaissance Force 5th Fleet, and Commander, Fleet Air Western
Pacific, homeported in Misawa, Japan. In this capacity he commanded all
Navy Patrol and Reconnaissance aircraft operations in the Western
Pacific, Indian Ocean and the Persian Gulf, including support of
Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Rear Adm. Deutsch returned to the OPNAV staff in October 2005, serving
as the Director, Warfare Integration (N6F) on the N6 staff.
Updated: 18 September 2007
Rear Adm. (lower half) Kevin M. Donegan is being
assigned as commander, Carrier Strike Group Five, Yokosuka, Japan.
Donegan is currently serving as director, Strategy and Policy
Division, N51, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, Washington, D.C.
Rear Admiral Kevin M. Donegan
Director, Policy and Strategy Division (N5SP)
Rear
Admiral Kevin Donegan is a 1980 Cum Laude graduate of the University of
Virginia where he earned a Bachelor of Science in Aerospace Engineering.
Designated a Naval Aviator in April 1982, he initially served as a Jet
Flight Instructor. His first fleet assignment was as a “Plank Owner” to
the “Wildcats” of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 131 where he made the
first East Coast deployment of the F/A-18 culminating in the successful
Libyan air strikes in April 1986. During this tour, Rear Adm. Donegan
graduated from the Navy Fighter Weapons School and was named “Wildcat
Pilot of the Year.”
In 1988, he graduated from the U.S. Navy Test Pilot School as the
“Outstanding Student” in his class and was subsequently assigned to the
Aircraft Carrier Suitability Branch of the Strike Aircraft Test
Directorate. Flying over 436 flight hours on a variety of test projects,
he received the “1989 Test Pilot of the Year Award”.
Rear Adm. Donegan returned to Cecil Field serving as a Department Head
in VFA-37 where he earned the Strike Fighter Wing’s “Mike Longardt
Leadership Award.”
He was then assigned to the Pentagon as the Aide/Administrative
Assistant to the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Plans, Policy, and
Operations. Moving to Naples, Italy in March 1994, he completed joint
duty as Flag Lieutenant to the Commander, Allied Forces Southern Europe.
During this tour Rear Adm. Donegan deployed to Sarajevo as the Northern
Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Liaison Officer to the Commander,
United Nations Protection Forces serving as the principal air advisor
during NATO’s close air support for United Nations troops and the
Deliberate Force air strikes.
Rear Adm. Donegan returned to VFA-131, in July 1996 as Executive Officer
and assumed Command in December 1997. After work-ups and a successful
deployment to the Persian Gulf in USS John C. Stennis, he led his
squadron to Virginia Beach, Va., as the first Hornet Squadron to
complete a change of homeport to Oceana, Va.
After Nuclear Power training he reported to USS
George Washington
as Executive Officer where he completed a deployment and work-up cycle
that garnered the ship the Battle “E”, The Admiral Flatley Safety Award,
and the Battenberg Cup as the best ship in the Atlantic Fleet.
In August 2002, he assumed command of USS
Coronado where he
completed accelerated work-ups and prepared the ship for its first
deployment in 15 years. The ship also earned three Command Excellence
Awards, The Secretary of the Navy Energy Conservation Award and The Navy
SW Region Community Service Award.
Rear Adm. Donegan assumed command of USS
Carl Vinson in May 2004.
The ship earned the Battle “E”, while executing an accelerated work up
cycle and simultaneously completing the planning for both a change of
homeport to Virginia and a refueling complex overhaul. In January 2005
he led Carl Vinson on a seven-month, around the world combat
deployment in support of the global war on terrorism that included 4
months of operations in the Persian Gulf. He also led Carl Vinson
through the first 12 months of their refueling overhaul and spearheaded
the Naval Aviation Enterprise’s Carrier Readiness Team in improving the
cost-wise readiness of 12 aircraft carriers. Rear Adm. Donegan was
honored as the Tailhook Association’s “Tailhooker of the Year” for 2006.
His personal awards include three Legion of Merits, the Defense
Meritorious Service Medal, four Meritorious Service Medals, the Air
Medal, two Navy Commendation Medals, two Navy Achievement Medals, and
several unit, service and campaign awards. Rear Adm. Donegan’s flying
experience includes over 3,700 hours in 31 different types of aircraft
and over 800 arrested landings on 15 different aircraft carriers.
Updated: 18 September 2007
Rear Adm. (lower half) Steven R. Eastburg is
being assigned as vice commander, Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent
River, Md. Eastburg is currently serving as commander, Naval Air
Warfare Center Aircraft Division/assistant commander for research and
engineering, Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, Md.
Rear Admiral Steven R. Eastburg
Commander, Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division
Assistant Commander for Research and Engineering, Naval Air Systems
Command
A
native of Cherry Hill, New Jersey, Rear Admiral Steven R. Eastburg
graduated from the United States Naval Academy in 1981 with a Bachelor
of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering. Upon completion of flight
training and designation as a Naval Flight Officer, he reported to Air
Anti-submarine Squadron 41 in San Diego, Calif, for fleet replacement
training in the S-3A Viking. He then reported to Air Anti-submarine
Squadron 38, where he made deployments to the Pacific, Western Pacific,
and Indian Oceans aboard the USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63) and USS
Ranger (CV-61).
Rear Adm. Eastburg reported to Operational Test and Evaluation Force,
Calif. He earned a Masters of Science degree in Systems Management from
the University of Southern California during this tour and was
redesignated as an Aerospace Engineering Duty Officer. He subsequently
completed the Naval Postgraduate School – Naval Test Pilot School
Cooperative Program, graduating with a Masters of Science Degree in
Aeronautical Engineering, the Aeronautical Engineer’s Degree, and Test
Pilot School diploma. His next assignment was as an S-3A/B Project
Officer at Force Aircraft Test Squadron, Patuxent River, Md.
Upon completion of the Advanced Program Manager’s Course, he assumed
duties as Deputy Program Manager in the Tomahawk All-Up-Round Program
Office (PMA-280). He was then assigned as the Executive Assistant to the
Deputy Commander for Acquisition and Operations, Naval Air Systems
Command, in Patuxent River, Md.
Following assignment as Chief Test Pilot, Air Test and Evaluation
Squadron 20, Patuxent River, Md, he served as Commanding Officer from
November 2000 to June 2002. During this period, the command was awarded
the Meritorious Unit Commendation and the Chief of Naval Operations
Safety Award. He served as the Avionics Department Head, Naval Air
Systems Command, prior to being assigned as Program Manager, Maritime
Surveillance Aircraft (PMA-290) from November 2002 through October 2005.
In this capacity, he was responsible for acquisition and life-cycle
support of Navy P-3, EP-3, S-3, P-8A, Aerial Common Sensor and foreign
military sales programs totaling 16 billion dollars. He was then
assigned as the duties as Deputy Program Executive Officer for ASW,
Assault and Special Mission Programs in October 2005.
In July 2006, he assumed his current position as Commander, Naval Air
Warfare Center Aircraft Division and Assistant Commander for Research
and Engineering, Naval Air Systems Command.
Rear Adm. Eastburg’s personal decorations include the Legion of Merit
(three awards), Meritorious Service Medal (two awards), and the Navy and
Marine Corps Commendation Medal (three awards).
Updated: 19 April 2007
Rear Adm. (lower half) Earl L. Gay is being
assigned as deputy chairman, Armed Forces Inaugural Committee, Washington,
D.C. Gay is currently serving as commandant, Naval District
Washington, Washington, D.C.
Rear Admiral Earl L. Gay
Commandant, Naval District Washington
Deputy Commander, Joint Forces Headquarters
National Capitol Region (JFHQ-NCR)
A
native of Atlanta, Ga., Rear Admiral Earl L. Gay is a 1980 graduate of
the United States Naval Academy. He completed flight training at Naval
Air Station Pensacola in 1981. Earning his master’s degree in Financial
Management from Troy State University, he is also a 1995 graduate of the
U.S. Air War College. Additionally, he attended the Joint Forces Staff
College in 2005.
Rear Adm. Gay’s initial sea assignments include deployments aboard the
USS Fletcher (DD 992), USS Cook (FF 1083), USS David R.
Ray (DD 971) and USS Crommelin (FFG 43). He commanded the
Helicopter Anti-Submarine Squadron Light (HSL) 43 BattleCats, deploying
the Navy’s first Armed Helo/Hellfire missile detachments. He also served
as Air Boss, USS Boxer (LHD 4), deploying with the 13th Marine
Expeditionary Unit (MEU) in 1999.
Assignments ashore include Search and Rescue pilot in the High Sierra
mountains at NAS Fallon, Nev., Instructor Pilot in the SH-60B aircraft
at HSL-41, Joint Plans Officer at U.S. Forces Command and U.S. Atlantic
Command, and Commanding Officer of HSL-41, training squadron for all
west coast SH-60B pilots and aircrewmen.
Rear Adm. Gay served as Commanding Officer of USS
Belleau Wood (LHA 3) from March 2003 until November 2004. Following this tour, Rear
Adm. Gay was assigned as the Navy’s Director of Congressional Liaison,
U.S. House of Representatives.
Rear Adm. Gay became the 86th Commandant of Naval District Washington,
the oldest continuously operated Navy installation in the nation, and
the National Capitol Region Joint Force Headquarters Deputy Commander,
in August 2007.
Rear Adm. Gay is honored to have served with numerous operational units
that have been awarded the Battle Efficiency “E” Award.
Updated: 13 August 2007
Rear Adm. (lower half) Janice M. Hamby is being
assigned as director for Command Control Systems, J6, Headquarters North
American Aerospace Defense Command/director, architectures and
integration, J6, U.S. Northern Command, Peterson Air Force Base,
Colo. Hamby is currently serving as director of global operations, N3,
Naval Network Warfare Command, Washington, D.C.
Rear Adm. (lower half) Daniel P. Holloway is
being assigned as director, Military Personnel Plans and Policy Division,
N13, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, Washington, D.C. Holloway
is currently serving as commander, Carrier Strike Group Twelve, Norfolk,
Va.
Rear Adm. Michael A. Lefever is being assigned
as director, Fleet Readiness Division, N43, Office of the Chief of
Naval Operations, Washington, D.C. Lefever is currently serving
as director, Military Personnel Plans and Policy Division, N13, Office
of the Chief of Naval Operations, Washington, D.C.
Rear Adm. (lower half) Arnold O. Lotring Jr.
is being assigned as chief operating officer, Naval Education and Training
Command, Norfolk, Va. Lotring is currently serving as commander, Naval
Service Training Command, Great Lakes, Ill.
Rear Adm. (lower half) Scott R. Van Buskirk is
being assigned as assistant deputy Chief of Naval Operations for
information, Plans, and Strategy, N3/N5B, Office of the Chief of Naval
Operations, Washington,D.C. Van Buskirk is currently serving as
commander, Carrier Strike Group Nine, Everett, Wash.
Northrop
Grumman gets job to repair Enterprise
by
Gregory Richards
The Virginian-Pilot
April 12, 2008
Northrop
Grumman Corp. was awarded a $453.3 million contract Friday for work on
the aircraft carrier Enterprise at its Newport News shipyard, the
Defense Department said.
The
maintenance and repair work, which is expected to take 16 months to
complete, will involve drydocking the ship, said Northrop Grumman
spokeswoman Jennifer Dellapenta.
The
Enterprise arrived at the shipyard Friday for the work, she said. It
joins two other aircraft carriers already at the yard, the George H.W.
Bush and the Carl Vinson.
The 1,123-foot long
Enterprise is the world's first nuclear powered aircraft carrier and
the only ship of its class. The Newport News shipyard built the
vessel, which entered naval service in 1961.
Young signs joint
strike fighter LRIP II memo
BY: Emelie
Rutherford, Defense Daily
04/15/2008
Pentagon acquisition
executive John Young last week signed a memo approving the purchased of
six conventional-takeoff-and-landing F-35 Joint Strike Fighters for the
Air Force, a source familiar with the matter said.
The acquisition
decision memo (ADM) from Young also conditionally OK's buying six
short-takeoff-and-vertical-landing (STOL) variants, but says that
purchase cannot be finalized until the STOVL jet has a successful first
flight, the source said.
The STOVL variant,
intended for use for the Marine Corps, is expected to undergo its first
flight--in conventional mode--in the May/June timeframe.
Young's ADM comes
after a March 26 Defense Acquisition Board meeting on allowing the
developmental JSF program to enter Low Rate Initial Production II.
Lockheed Martin is building the airframes.
Young, in the ADM, releases
approximately $243 million, in already appropriated fiscal year 2008
dollars, for long-lead items for LRIP III, the source said. The memo
also directs the Cost Analysis Improvement Group to conduct a JSF
review and provide a cost estimate of the program between 2010 and
2015, the source said. From U.S. Air Force AIM Points
HSL-46
Gets the Golden Wrench
Story Number: NNS080416-06
Release Date: 4/16/2008 12:23:00 PM
By Mass
Communication Specialist 2nd Daniel Gay, Fleet Public Affairs Center
Detachment Southeast
MAYPORT, Fla (NNS) -- Helicopter Anti-Submarine Squadron
Light (HSL) 46 was presented with the coveted Sikorsky Aircraft
"Golden Wrench Award" for maintenance excellence, April 10. This was
the same day they celebrated their anniversary, 20 years from when
they were commissioned, aboard Naval Station Mayport.
"It means a tremendous amount to me to receive the [Golden Wrench]
award because this squadron was founded on strong ideals and it
makes me very honored to hold up those ideas that were put in place
20 years ago," said Cmdr. Chris Dennis, commanding officer of HSL
46.
The ceremony was also attended by Commander Helicopter Maritime
Strike Wing Atlantic, Capt. Glen Doyle.
"It's great to come back here, whether I liked or didn't like my
job, I don't think I could ever leave it because I still get the
opportunity to attend these events with these great people," said
Doyle.
After the award was presented to Dennis, the first official "Golden
Wrench" uniform patch was handed to HSL 46's Maintenance Master
Chief, Avionics Master Chief (AW/SW) Charles Lovely.
"It sets the standard for this seawall, and it defines how good the
people we have are, how good our maintenance department is from the
lowest level to the highest rank," said Lovely.
The "Grandmasters" of HSL 46 were commissioned on April 7, 1988.
First EMALS generator assembled,
completes first round of testing
The first full size test motor
generator for the Navy’s Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS)
has been assembled and finished factory acceptance testing April 11.
The testing, which lasted approximately 30 days, was done at the
manufacturer, Kato Engineering in Mankato, Minn.
"The successful completion of the First Article Testing on the EMALS
motor generator is a significant step in getting EMALS to the
Fleet,” said Capt. Randy Mahr, program manager of PMA-251, Aircraft
Launch and Recovery Equipment Programs. “The General Atomics and
Navy teams have worked closely together in reaching this milestone."
The motor generator is a huge piece of equipment: 13 ½ feet long,
almost 11 feet wide and almost seven feet tall. Weighing in at more
than 80,000 pounds, the motor generator is capable of delivering up
to 60 megajoules of electricity and 60 megawatts at its peak. That
much electricity could power more than 12,000 homes for three
seconds -- the time it takes to launch an aircraft off a carrier.
This motor generator is one part of the electromagnetic aircraft
launch system for the Navy’s new class of aircraft carriers, the
Gerald R. Ford-class. The Navy is building the next generation of
electromagnetic launch technology to replace the existing steam
catapults used on current generation Nimitz-class aircraft carriers.
The motor generator is part of a suite of equipment called the
Energy Storage Subsystem. Included in this equipment suite is the
motor generator, the generator control tower and the stored energy
exciter power supply. Twelve of each are required for the new Gerald
R. Ford-class aircraft carrier. Five of each are currently being
manufactured under the Systems Development & Demonstration contract
with General Atomics, one for component level testing and four will
be installed and used for system level testing at the Lakehurst,
N.J., EMALS catapult site. – From NAVAIR Press Releases 17APR08
========================
Ronald
Reagan Strike Group Underway for JTFEX 08-5
Story Number: NNS080412-04
Release Date: 4/12/2008 5:43:00 PM
From
USS Ronald Reagan Public Affairs
USS RONALD REAGAN, At sea (NNS) -- Sailors assigned to
USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76), the staff of Commander, Carrier Strike
Group (CCSG) 7 and embarked Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 14 departed San
Diego April 11 to participate in Joint Task Force Exercise (JTFEX)
08-5.
JTFEX 08-5 is scheduled to take place April 11-18 off the coast of
Southern California, and is designed to be a realistic exercise in
real-world operations and the operational challenges faced by U.S.
forces in cooperation with coalition militaries.
The exercise is the final step in preparing the Ronald Reagan Strike
Group for its upcoming deployment and will test the group's ability
to plan and execute the Navy's Maritime Strategy alongside other
U.S. and coalition forces in complex, hostile warfighting
environments.
"JTFEX is a graduate-level exercise to ensure Ronald Reagan and
Carrier Air Wing 14 will be ready to take the fight to our enemies
when called upon," said Capt. Terry Kraft, Ronald Reagan's
commanding officer.
"JTFEX will help to get us into the joint operations mode and
simulate the type of real-world scenarios we may face while
conducting military operations with our allies," added Kraft.
Rear Adm. James P. "Phil" Wisecup, commander, Carrier Strike Group
7, said that JTFEX 08-5 demonstrates the capabilities of the carrier
strike group under the Maritime Strategy and how the Ronald Reagan
Strike Group can play an important role in protecting the interests
of the United States.
"JTFEX is the last check in the box before we deploy, and a great
opportunity for us to prepare ourselves to go over the horizon,"
said Wisecup. "Our job is to protect the freedom of the seas, deter
our adversaries, and, if deterrence fails, take action in support of
American interests," said Wisecup.
The Ronald Reagan Strike Group is comprised of CCSG 7, CVW-14,
Destroyer Squadron (DESRON) 7, the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier
Ronald Reagan (CVN 76), the guided-missile cruiser USS
Chancellorsville (CG 62), the guided-missile destroyers USS Decatur
(DDG 73), USS Gridley (DDG 101), USS Howard (DDG 83) and the guided
missile frigate USS Thach (FFG 43).
The squadrons of CVW-14 include the "Redcocks" of VFA-22, "Fist of
the Fleet" of VFA-25, "Stingers" of VFA-113, "Eagles" of VFA-115,
"Black Eagles" of Airborne Early Warning Squadron (VAW) 113,
"Cougars" of Tactical Electronic Warfare Squadron (VAQ) 139,
"Providers" of Carrier Logistics Support (VRC) 30 and the "Black
Knights" of Helicopter Anti-Submarine Squadron (HS) 4.
Ronald Reagan was commissioned in July 2003, making it the ninth and
newest Nimitz-class nuclear-powered aircraft carrier. The ship is
named after the 40th U.S. President, and carries the motto of "Peace
through Strength," a recurrent theme during the Reagan presidency.
CNO
Visits USS Harry S. Truman
Story Number: NNS080416-04
Release Date: 4/16/2008 12:13:00 PM

By Mass
Communication Specialist 2nd Class (SW) Heather Weaver, USS Harry S.
Truman Public Affairs
USS HARRY S. TRUMAN, At Sea (NNS) -- Chief of Naval
Operations (CNO) Adm. Gary Roughead visited the crew of the
nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) April
15 to address Sailors deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of
operations (AOO).
Roughead is visiting the U.S. Naval Forces Central Command (NAVCENT)
AOO to strengthen international maritime partnerships as part of the
Navy's Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower and meet with
regional leaders in an effort to increase dialogue and cooperation.
During his visit to Harry S. Truman, Roughead took time to award
three commendation medals as well as reenlist 38 Sailors. He also
held an all-hands call for the crew. During his address, the CNO
said it was an honor to visit the ship because the crew has done a
phenomenal job of representing the dedication and commitment of the
U.S. Navy.
"The work of this particular strike group has been extraordinary,"
he said. "You all are setting the bar, and you should be very proud
of that."
Roughead said Sailors should also realize they are making a
contribution to the big picture by flawlessly performing daily
operations.
"You should be very proud of the operations you are conducting," he
said. "The work that you're doing, whether its flying strikes into
Iraq, supporting coalition efforts in the Arabian Gulf or the work
you're doing with other coalition partners … all makes a huge
difference. It's consistent with the strategy that we outline in our
program as to where we're taking our Navy."
The Arabian Gulf is a body of water more commonly known as the
Persian Gulf.
During his address to the crew, Roughead discussed a ground-breaking
change-of-command for Combined Task Force (CTF) 152 between Rear
Adm. Bill Gortney, Commander, Carrier Strike Group (CCSG)10, and the
Royal Bahraini Navy.
"This is the first time that an Arab nation has stepped up to the
leadership role," Roughead said. "I believe when we look back at
this, it will resound as a significant event in history and you all
have been part of that."
CTF 152 is responsible for Maritime Security Operations in the
Central and Southern Persian Gulf. Roughead also discussed his top
three priorities while aboard Truman.
"Number one, we have to maintain the readiness we have today to
ensure you are able to go out and do the job and be ready to do the
things that the nation asks of us," he said. "Another aspect is
building tomorrow's Navy. And the other part that, to me is the most
important, is about people. If we stand on the ship today and look
at the airplanes or fly around in helicopters, all of that has no
value … until you make [it all] come alive. What you give to our
Navy is absolutely irreplaceable."
Truman is underway in the Persian Gulf on a regularly scheduled
deployment to the U.S. 5th Fleet. Operations in the U.S. 5th Fleet
AOO are focused on reassuring regional partners of the coalition's
commitment to help set conditions for security and stability. U.S.
forces maintain a naval and air presence in the region that deters
destabilizing activities while safeguarding the region's vital links
to the global economy.
U.S. Marines, Navy To Buy Scan Eagle UAVs
By kris
osborn
Published: 17 Apr 20:05 EDT (16:05 GMT)
The U.S.
Marine Corps and the Navy intend to buy a yet-to-be determined number of
Scan Eagles, which are 40-pound vertical-takeoff UAVs with
electro-optical infrared sensors that can beam images from 5,000 feet,
service officials said.

The U.S. Marine
Corps recently conducted test flights of the Scan Eagle UAV at
Quantico, Va. (Kris Osborn / Staff)
The
services may seek to arm the UAV, said Lt. Col. Chris Patton, Marine
Corps UAS capabilities officer.
The
services currently lease Scan Eagles from their manufacturer, Bingen,
Wash.-based Insitu. The Navy, Marines and U.S. Air Force have flown Scan
Eagles more than 80,000 hours since the beginning of the wars in Iraq
and Afghanistan.
The Scan
Eagle takes off from a launcher and is retrieved by a rope suspended
from the launcher.
"A
compressed-air launcher catapults the vehicle with a constant
acceleration," said Paul McDuffee, Insitu's vice president of flight
operations and training.
"It takes
up a minimum amount of desk space. It does not require a net. It just
uses a rope," he said. "With no net and no runway, you can operate from
a field. You do not need a large expanse. This makes it ideal for
shipborne operations." .
The
Marine Corps has four Scan Eagle units in Iraq and Afghanistan, Patton
said.
"It
has been great for IED detection, running up and down the roads and
seeing things before the Marines get to them," Patton said.
|
|